Jump to content

Joel Meyerowitz: phones killed the sexiness of the street


JDMvW

Recommended Posts

I think style and design have had a negative impact on the aesthetics of street photography. The visual cohesiveness and order in Meyerowitz's photos is very difficult to come by nowadays. The street is full of visual clutter and pollution: car design, signage and billboards, fashion and style, are all a mess. I think style and taste are down the drain and it reflects in street photography.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

For me, the beauty of street photography is its “this is what you get” nature. The street, photographically speaking, isn’t necessarily meant to be idealized, ordered, cohesive, or aesthetic in the way we typically think of as aesthetic. The street in photos often gets its aesthetics in the randomness and messiness of different sides or aspects of life. Design, as it were, whether it be of cars, clothing, or buildings, is not so much an aesthetic thing in itself in street work as much as it provides support and context for the energy to be found out there. So, like it or not, the auto and hair and clothing and architectural fashion of the day is there to be woven into the story of today. Yesterday is, for the most part, gone. I can be as nostalgic as the next guy and I appreciate older styles more than newer ones in a lot of cases but, If I as a street photographer don’t find some of those things as aesthetic as “back in the day,” then I need to figure out a way to express that, figure out a way to find an alternative aesthetic in more contemporary design or lack of it, find more nostalgic street settings, which still exist, or start working in another genre. It’s not the job of the street to make itself photographically compelling to people who remember better times. It’s the job of street photographers to rise to the challenge of documenting and expressing something significant about what’s going on out there now.
  • Like 1
We didn't need dialogue. We had faces!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The cellphone comment was one line in a medium-length article. I think Meyerowitz is essentially correct about the changes in the street as a part of "modern" culture. Of course, I suffer from nostalgia like everyone else, but I honestly believe that the texture of life has changed (probably not for better or worse). A few years ago, I scanned some negatives I'd shot back in the early 80s, and the lack of cellphones really struck me. I also noticed less use of phones in Spain and much of the UK outside London. Ditto for semi-rural France, come to think of it. Maybe it's a North American thing?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course, I suffer from nostalgia like everyone else, but I honestly believe that the texture of life has changed (probably not for better or worse).

I get off on nostalgia, too, and I agree with you about the texture of life having changed. The thing I keep in mind about nostalgia is that as good and real as it feels, it’s also familiar and comforting. Newer textures are less known and a little more of a challenge, sometimes downright strange. So while I may luxuriate at times under the silks and satins (and even the tie-dyes) of the past, it’s also important to me to experience and express things about the more metallic, more LED, more binary-coded textures of the contemporary world.

We didn't need dialogue. We had faces!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are not old enough, it will not mean much, but...i really miss (from a photographic viewpoint) Cigarettes and Phone Booths.

I took lots of interesting frames that involved people in or near a phone booth. They often had all types of ads (of the day) associated with them, not to mention they varied from a small "building" to a mere phone under an overhanging piece of metal. They were used for making phone calls that made people look Happy/Sad/Trance Like...a whole myriad of emotions took place while a person was in a phone booth.

Cigarettes.?.....nothing ever took the place of smoke in a 100 different situations and light. Smoking could make a woman look "cheap", it could also make her look sexy as Hell. Cigarettes had their own, unique effect on Men, in a photo, as well.

Mr Meyerowitz might have chosen his words poorly, or he might just be plain wrong, but i get what he is saying.

Other members have said it, but Yeah.......these situations have been happening "to" photographers from the very beginning. It use to be very common to see a horse in a frame.....either just there, or because they were THE major source of transportation and commerce at one time in our history. How often now, circa 2015, do you look at "Street Photography" and see a horse.?

Good/Bad/Indifferent...the cell phone has had an impact on photography. They are "everywhere".

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Speaking of smoke and smells in the city, bus exhaust is still around and, especially at dawn or sunset can be almost as sexy and probably as toxic as the erotic cancer-causing cigarette smoke we miss so much . . .

 

Also, much more benign but sometimes very photogenic is the steam rising from the pavement after a warm rain.

We didn't need dialogue. We had faces!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Nostalgia is grossly underrated.

 

For example. As a geezer a Chuck Berry song comes on the radio and I experience a wonderful flood of memories of meeting Susie at that party that Friday night. But when a Katie Perry song comes on, I simply hear sounds, maybe pretty, maybe lush, maybe interesting, but no impact to my soul. Street photographs are the same. I gaze at that Joel Meyerowitz photo, the one with the '59 caddy, and I think pleasing thoughts of my crazy uncle and his caddy, who died 30 years ago. A picture taken yesterday with a 2015 Buick in the background means nothing to my soul. I can enjoy both photos intellectually, but only emotionally.

 

Everyone's 'old days' represent the period where they learned about life, death, love, sex, violence, hope, fear and joy. Old songs and old photos act like greeting cards from the past. I do not try to live in the past, but I sure enjoy the greeting cards that come unexpectedly.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Old songs and old photos act like greeting cards from the past.

True. But not all photos are meant to act like greeting cards. Thankfully. A GOOD street photo with a 2015 Buick in the background won’t cause a nostalgic emotional response but will cause some other significant response in an open viewer. As a matter of fact, an exercise worth trying is creating the mood of nostalgia in a photo without photographing something old or from childhood. It can be done. There’s a difference between a good street photo and a snapshot taken on the street that happens to have a Buick in it. Some snapshots are very good. Most are tossaways.

 

In any case, the point was not to put down nostalgia. The point was to put down nostalgia when it creates an atmosphere, as expressed by Meyerowitz, where it prevents him from engaging in the present or preoccupies one enough to continually distract them from what’s happening today or induces one to spend a lot of time comparing yesterday to today.

We didn't need dialogue. We had faces!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...