dave_dejoy Posted March 31, 2009 Share Posted March 31, 2009 <p>Here is my question. I have the choice of buying CS4, Elements 7, or Lightroom. I am a pc user and I want to be able to organize and do basic photo editing. I am not interested in extensie manipulation. What would be my best investment. I have used CS2 and Elements 2. Appreciate the help and don't want to start a firestorm.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ellis_vener_photography Posted March 31, 2009 Share Posted March 31, 2009 <p>Adobe Photoshop Lightroom v2.3 is right up the alley of your needs and desires. Also order a copy of MArtin Evening's "The Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Book" while you are it. it is the most readable, comprehensible and comprehensive guide to getting the most out of Lightroom.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elmroc Posted March 31, 2009 Share Posted March 31, 2009 <p>I agree with Ellis. I used CS3, Elements, 6 &7, but i have to say, Lightroom is by far the quickest and easiest to learn out of the 3. This is probably do due the fact that it doesn't include a good portion of the edting tools that the others do, or they are setup in a way, that makes them easier to use.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
huperetes Posted March 31, 2009 Share Posted March 31, 2009 <p>GIMP.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andylynn Posted March 31, 2009 Share Posted March 31, 2009 <p>Lightroom is the only one of those that's for organizing. It's what PC users can get because they can't get Aperture :) Gimp is also not for organizing. Lightroom does have some retouch/manipulation tools (though not as extensive as Photoshop or Elements) so it seems that's what you'll want.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbcooper Posted March 31, 2009 Share Posted March 31, 2009 <blockquote> <p> "...I want to be able to organize and do basic photo editing."</p> </blockquote> <p>This is <em>exactly</em> what Lightroom was created for.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimstrutz Posted March 31, 2009 Share Posted March 31, 2009 <p>I use Lightroom for most basic editing, but there are quite a few things it won't do, so you will probably find yourself needing to add Photoshop Elements. But Elements can be had for well under $100, so that shouldn't break the bank if and when you need need it later.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
howard_m Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 <p>+5 Lightroom</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patricklavoie Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 <p>+1000000000000 Lightroom 2.3 ; )</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomas_kroljic1 Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 <p><<I am a pc user and I want to be able to organize and do basic photo editing.>></p> <p>PhotoShop Elements can handle most of your photo editing needs. I have version 6 and I still don't use most of the capabilities. Also, PSE comes with a Organizer software. This allows you to import and organize your photos and then quickly launch PSE for editing.<br> I'd check out a demo or free trial of PSE first before spending $$ on LR</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pankaj purohit Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 <p>Photoshop full version is always best, CS4 is full featured while lightroom is specially for photographers which includes features which are usually required by the photographers in photoshop and elements is cheaper than both with easy interface.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brad_smith8 Posted April 1, 2009 Share Posted April 1, 2009 <p>I find myself doing more LR stuff in DX0. DX0 has some nice presets, as well as smart tools that produce nice corrections.</p> <p>The 'DX0 Lens Softness' tool is my favorite sharpener, and other tools have more options than LR (and 'DX0 Lighting is better than other exposure tools I've used). It cannot replace PS if you use layers, masks, etc. but I like it better than LR as a developer.</p> <p>It reads RAW's and has the before/after view of LR. It's much slower in that it must go through a processing step, but you may want to see if you like it by comparing the output from both trials.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r_johnston Posted April 2, 2009 Share Posted April 2, 2009 <p>Basically Id stick with CS2 and buy Lightroom, the latter will do all your organizing and in addition make moderate changes you want to images without altering the original. I'd been using CS and Lightroom. Last Year upgraded to CS3 by purchasing an original upgrade on eBay for $150 and now use them. But, if Id had to pay full price for the upgrade, never would have done so, as the added benefit over CS for me, would not have been worth the price.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave_dejoy Posted April 2, 2009 Author Share Posted April 2, 2009 <p>Helpful advice as always. Thanks.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now