laurent-paul Posted April 3, 2008 Share Posted April 3, 2008 Sorry if this has been already posted, but I could find anything about it. I'm a bit annoyed with the 100 limitation of "Interesting People". I can understand that you would like to avoid communities of buddies rating themselves, and you certainly want to push memebers to discover new photographers. But, as it may be weeks when I won't log in, I'm personaly always interested first by looking if any members whose work if like to look at did upload some new photos. I did put myself as an interesting people, not because of an egotrip problem, but it always show me who did update their portfolios since the last time I logged in. But there are in my list, photogrpaphers who haven't updated anything for weeks, and, again, as I can't log in every day, I would be really sad to miss any new photo from them. I also have on my list quite a few members who are there not because of their portfolio : Either they don't have any photos, or they don't upload any new ones, BUT I always like to read what they are writing on the forums, and sometimes, their posts are not on the pages anymore, but we can acces them from their profile page. So perhaps, it could be an idea to push this limit a little bit. I read that there are more than 100 000 active members. With a limitation of 100, are you implying that I'm supposed to find that only 0.1 % of the active memebers are interesting ;-) ? Thank you very much for ready this laurent Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laurent-paul Posted April 3, 2008 Author Share Posted April 3, 2008 *Thank you very much for readING this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike_stemberg Posted April 3, 2008 Share Posted April 3, 2008 I wonder if this a 'glitch'of some sort, for I have more than a 100 interesting people (for me that is), and I don't remember any sort of problem when I went over that number..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laurent-paul Posted April 3, 2008 Author Share Posted April 3, 2008 Hm ... Seems that I have been "Giltched" since registration then ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pmj Posted April 3, 2008 Share Posted April 3, 2008 If you don't mind, I'd like to login as you (Laurent-Paul) and try to add a member just to see what kind of error we get in the logfiles. (No need to post/mail passwords for this). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laurent-paul Posted April 3, 2008 Author Share Posted April 3, 2008 no problem Patrick : just do what you like or need. If it helps : this is what I'm getting when trying to add a new interesting person : Problem with Your Input We had a problem processing your entry: There are too many people on your list, in relation to how long you have been a photo.net member. Either wait to add another person, or remove some people before adding more. Please back up using your browser, correct it, and resubmit your entry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobatkins Posted April 3, 2008 Share Posted April 3, 2008 Looks like it may be related to the fact that you've only been a member of the site for 3 months. I don't know what the restrictions are and how long you have to be a member before your "interesting persons" limit goes up, but I expect that's something that Patrick either knows or can easily look up. I'm not quite sure why there is this particular time limitation, but I know we have had people join and immediately do all sorts of strange and server intensive things which have caused problems, so I do understand why there are some limits on what you can and can't do right after joining the site. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pmj Posted April 3, 2008 Share Posted April 3, 2008 I looked at the program code behind the Interesting People feature. Bob is right: the number of days that one has been a member limits the number of people you can add to the list, although nobody is allowed to add more than 500 people. I don't know when or why these limits were instated. I think we should ask Josh before we make any changes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laurent-paul Posted April 3, 2008 Author Share Posted April 3, 2008 Thank you both very much for having taken the time to have a look. I can perfectly understand limits are important for the site. Still, I think the number may be a bit low considering the number of members. But I'm still enjoying the site very much :-) Thank you for the feedback Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joshroot Posted April 7, 2008 Share Posted April 7, 2008 I'm going to guess the only real issue at the moment may be increased server load. But I may be wrong on that. I'll ask Jin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laurent-paul Posted April 11, 2008 Author Share Posted April 11, 2008 Josh, Sorry for the late answer : I didn't expect any more posts. Thank you very much for taking the time to have a look at that. It is just a very little bit annoying, but really is a detail, and of course, if a larger list of interesting people increses the server load, forget about it : it is much more important to focus energies and ressources to the fuildity of the site. thanks a lot laurent Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now