martin_alston Posted September 9, 2006 Share Posted September 9, 2006 I have read a lot of people that seem to use HC110 at a 1:45 ratio. I'm trying to come up with a starting time for development. I current use a lot of TMax 100 but have started using some Ilford films. The only development times I can find on any charts is for dilution A and B. Why aren't the other dilutions on the charts? I've seen a few people say develop the 1:45 for about 4:30, but according to the chart @ 68* you should develop for 6 minutes for dilution B. Since 1:45 is a weaker dilution, shouldn't the development time be longer? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobertChura Posted September 9, 2006 Share Posted September 9, 2006 Here's what I used for Tmax. It came from John Sexton <P> http://webpages.charter.net/rchura/film.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobertChura Posted September 9, 2006 Share Posted September 9, 2006 Sorry, the previous is for tmax developer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronald_moravec1 Posted September 9, 2006 Share Posted September 9, 2006 Not to brag, but I was the one who started posting that procedure. The times for Tri x at 1:32 and EI 200 are too short for good control and diluting to 1:63 makes to much grain. 1:45 is about in the middle and the negs are amazing. If you double the dilution ( 1:63), times are normally extended 50%, say four to six minutes. 1:45 should be right in the middle, 5 minutes. I tested and it works. Another way is just multiply the time for 1:32 by 1.25. Just shoot 6 frames on a roll, pull out 12 in in the dark and develope and PRINT for a trial. I have a bench marked with various distances for how many frames have been used and I develop partial rolls all the time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronald_moravec1 Posted September 9, 2006 Share Posted September 9, 2006 I might add HC110 will develope TMax 100 and the prints will look good to you until you compare them to D76 negs/prints. Do the same subject at the same time with both. You will see what I mean. Kodak`s site lists Xtol and D76 in bold letters meaning they are a primary recommendation. HC110 is not bold meaning it is secondary. They no longer clearly explain this coding, but it has been in use 50 years I know about. It works fine with Delta 100, 5 min at 68 for a condenser enlarger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim_appleyard Posted September 9, 2006 Share Posted September 9, 2006 More info: http://www.covingtoninnovations.com/hc110/ http://www.mironchuk.com/hc-110.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul_viapiano Posted September 10, 2006 Share Posted September 10, 2006 I use HC110 with Tri-X (TXP 320) all the time at Dilution H (twice the dilution of "B") and have no problem with grain using small tank processing of 120 film.<p> <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/viapiano/sets/72157594181176569/">Click here for an example</a><p> I have yet to try it with TMax 100/400, but there was a very nice portfolio in last month's View Camera magazine, wherein the photographer used HC110 Dilution B with TMax and the results were excellent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now