sam_richardson Posted July 21, 2004 Share Posted July 21, 2004 Now if there were private booths.......enclosed with doors or curtains......yeah, I would consider THAT expectation of privacy. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Thomas,why should you let that stop you! If there were no signs prohibiting photography AND/OR the people were not displaying some sort of sign saying that they didn't want to be photographed then they are fair game. If they do not want to be photographed then they should've said it when they entered and continued to state it throughout their meal. A door or curtain is not a reason to stop photographing, especially when you obviously have so much empathy and respect for other humans. I have no problem with street photography, although in the case above I see no respect for the subject, as HBC assumed you all had. Grant posting the shot was more about his immature reaction to having someone question what he does for his personal pleasure. I'm still not totally convinced that it is the woman that did not want to be photographed because I can't believe that someone would go ahead and post it on the internet. That to me does not show empathy or respect for other people. PS SP is dead, at least as we know it in the west. There are still hobbyist (such as you guys) but it's dead and buried in the art world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brad_ Posted July 21, 2004 Share Posted July 21, 2004 Sam, there are just some things you won't be able to understand or get a grasp on. That's OK. www.citysnaps.net Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bruno Posted July 21, 2004 Share Posted July 21, 2004 I'd skip all the question about morality and law... being myself immoral and illegal... and turn back to the original question: 1. Lie. Pretend that you are from some press agency or a freelancer doing a report on this or that subject. It works. 2. Lie. Tell that it is for an art exhibition. 3. Don't ask, just shoot. 4. Say the truth, tell that you're not from the press. Because in certain situations this could lead you in BIG trouble. 5. Lie at your own pleasure. Now, this looks like a joke, but it is not. The problem is that you have to understand a little bit about of the person you're talking to. Just find a way to please or unplease them. Then you can also picture their reactions. This was one way. Another way is go there and start talking about whatever comes up to your mind. In your case, it was the dog. Talk about her dog for some minutes, after you earned some confidence, it is more likely that the person will agree to be taken on picture. I don't do this all the time. Sometimes I don't have time or simply forget about it. But the times you can obtain a more complex interaction you will be able to take much better pictures. Other tricks: dress elegant. If I'm in a sweat shirt people will say f**k off. I'f I'm wearing a jacket or a trench coat, it works better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bruno Posted July 21, 2004 Share Posted July 21, 2004 Ah, forgot this: move to Southern Countries. People are more keen to be taken in pictures in Italy, Portugal, Spain, Greece rather than Germany, for example. If you just go around with a camera in Italy, there are places where people will ask you to take a picture of them. You don't even have to ask, it's for free. Southern people are less paranoid than Northern Europeans and Americans. Just try to ask a German if he/she wants to be taken in a picture... you'll get a glance like you asked if you could rob him/her. Sorry to make this rude remarks... but it's what my experience told me until now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_sidlo Posted July 21, 2004 Share Posted July 21, 2004 <center><p><i>Dark Restaurant</i></p><img src=http://www.johnsidlo.com/images/AvraRestaurantsm.jpg /></center> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EricM Posted July 21, 2004 Share Posted July 21, 2004 asking's no fun...<center><img src=" http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/2547783-md.jpg"></center> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spearhead Posted July 21, 2004 Share Posted July 21, 2004 But sometimes it's essential to self-preservation.<p> <center><img src="http://www.spirer.com/images/tatts.jpg"><br><i>Tattoos, Copyright 2000 Jeff Spirer</i></center> Music and Portraits Blog: Life in Portugal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patrick_ingram Posted July 21, 2004 Share Posted July 21, 2004 <p><i>Shoot first then ask later. Remember, the photo is most important. More important than her feelings of invasion.</i> </p><p>That's a bit cold. Sarah, I think you did the right thing, and it sucks that it didn't work out. Fish in the sea and all that. I would suggest, next time, that you ask the dog's name first, or something like that. The personal interaction might help a little bit with the subsequent request. It's true that if you ask permission some people will turn you down just because they can, and that sucks, but I don't think this should force one to adopt a dog-eat-dog mentality. I see people with that mentality every day in all aspects of life, and it's ugly. There are plenty of people who will let you take their photo (and especially their dog's), and despite the above quote I never place more value on <i>my</i> photograph than I do on another human being.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richard_milner2 Posted July 22, 2004 Share Posted July 22, 2004 It seems to me that if you ask permission the shot changes from a candid street photo to an informal portrait. Am I just a pedant? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
._._z Posted July 22, 2004 Share Posted July 22, 2004 Maybe you are ;-) , but your conclusion seems about right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allen Herbert Posted July 25, 2004 Share Posted July 25, 2004 I don't. Just develop good technique. In the UK every road, virtually every street corner has surveillance cameras. We even have coppers popping out of bushes on quite country lanes with little speed cameras. So tell me about asking permissions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allen Herbert Posted July 25, 2004 Share Posted July 25, 2004 It would seem to me that you folks over there should be worrying about the number of firearms being carried by all sorts. Someone taking a photo of your wife should be the least of your concerns. Seems your values are somewhat wanting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allen Herbert Posted July 25, 2004 Share Posted July 25, 2004 I'm sure John Lennon would have been happier shot with a camera. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
claudia__ Posted July 25, 2004 Share Posted July 25, 2004 the idea of taking pictures of strangers is slightly odd to begin with. bad karma to capture peoples' souls and then post it on the internet ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jay_. Posted July 26, 2004 Share Posted July 26, 2004 It all boils down to whether or not you care about the wishes and feelings of others. If you do, you ask, and respect their answer. If you don't, you don't. Being within your legal rights and being courteous are different issues but they seem to get confused on these threads. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
windsor Posted July 26, 2004 Share Posted July 26, 2004 OK, so you don't ask, take the picture and move on. What happens when your work is "discovered" and galleries start asking for your amazing street shots and they do a leather bound retrospective volume of your work for $34.99 at Barnes and Noble? When that lady is actually in witness protection and you've just exposed her? Tongue in cheek, yes. But I'm not concerned about taking the photo. I'm concerned about displaying it. Maybe not in a major gallery--but what about on the wall of my cube? Does that violate anything? If I put a dozen shots of candid strangers on my walls because I like the photos, does it constitute a wrongful act on my part? Do I need to get permission after the fact to display the pictures? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allen Herbert Posted July 26, 2004 Share Posted July 26, 2004 It all boils down to whether or not you care about the wishes and feelings of others Just a photo,Jay. Not really going to harm anyone, is it.Okay, a photo of your wife caught with her knickers down, with your next door neighbour....well, that's a different thing;) Folks really should not be so touchy. Plenty of more importnt thing to be touchy about.Someone taking your photo...Wow, how terrible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
._._z Posted July 26, 2004 Share Posted July 26, 2004 <i><blockquote> It all boils down to whether or not you care about the wishes and feelings of others </blockquote> </i><p> That statement is too damned funny, considering the source. <p> Irony rules! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sandy. Posted July 26, 2004 Share Posted July 26, 2004 Hi .[. Z, Found you. Peace :-)) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
absinthe Posted July 26, 2004 Share Posted July 26, 2004 I went out today with my mother, strolling around the city. We worked our way over to Washington Square Park where we stopped to rest & people watch. There was a jazz band playing & this lone guy standing in front of them kind of just digging the music, bopping his head, tapping his feet & snapping his fingers. I walked right up to him & snapped of a few frames before he noticed & then he just kind of waved at me & smiled. I smiled back & walked back to my bench. My mother says in motherly tone, "did you ask his permission first?". I responded that if I had, he would have posed & it wouldn't be the shot I wanted. She gave me that motherly "I do not approve" stare & that is where we ended that conversation :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
._._z Posted July 27, 2004 Share Posted July 27, 2004 Let's see your mom's street photos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
absinthe Posted July 27, 2004 Share Posted July 27, 2004 LOL! The idea of street photography is not appealing to her Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
._._z Posted July 27, 2004 Share Posted July 27, 2004 Mothers like to offer advice about things they don't like. Or know about. Next time change the subject about something else she might not know about: her favorite death- metal bands, or tattoo designs, or condom brands. ;-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lee park Posted July 27, 2004 Share Posted July 27, 2004 Gosh I hate those looks! I'm almost 50 and my mom is still offering disapproval about my hair length (a tattoo definitely has a certain appeal!). My mother will never take my photography seriously ... Heather's point is well-taken, however - as well as other's - once you get permission you've "missed the moment." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonathan_reynolds Posted July 28, 2004 Share Posted July 28, 2004 I haven't read this entire thread, but I noticed that someone brought HCB into the argument in support of the 'ask-first-and-respect-the-answer' school. I'd love to have been there if he really asked those people he shot having intercourse in a Mexican brothel. He didn't hold back from diplaying the picture, either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now