The Digital Darkroom: Process, Technique & Printing
Subforums
-
- 75
- posts
-
- Legacy Box
- By gregf,
-
- 91
- posts
44,497 topics in this forum
-
- 9 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 16 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 9 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 15 replies
- 797 views
-
- 4 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 2 replies
- 680 views
-
- 3 replies
- 689 views
-
- 5 replies
- 933 views
-
- 4 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 9 replies
- 772 views
-
- 5 replies
- 2k views
-
- 1 reply
- 355 views
-
- 3 replies
- 561 views
-
- 3 replies
- 504 views
-
- 3 replies
- 669 views
-
- 2 replies
- 400 views
-
- 5 replies
- 465 views
-
- 8 replies
- 653 views
-
- 7 replies
- 538 views
-
- 5 replies
- 545 views
-
- 9 replies
- 732 views
-
- 10 replies
- 470 views
-
- 28 replies
- 971 views
-
- 13 replies
- 918 views
-
- 3 replies
- 867 views
-
Who's Online 15 Members, 0 Anonymous, 443 Guests (See full list)
-
Recent Gallery Images
-
Recent Forum Wide Posts
-
By john_shriver · Posted
There were very high domestic excise taxes on cameras in Japan in that era. So cameras to be sold through the post exchanges to American GI's were specially marked because they would not be taxed. A Japanese citizen with an <EP> or <CPO> marked camera would be presumed to be a tax dodger. For similar reasons, the Nikkormat was known as the Nikomat in Japan -- to make it clear that was the domestic "taxed" model. -
By john_shriver · Posted
Probably without rangefinder coupling, since they describe them as "mirrorless." -
-
-
-
