Pentax
10,253 topics in this forum
-
- 5 replies
- 116 views
-
- 1 reply
- 114 views
-
- 1 reply
- 140 views
-
- 1 reply
- 143 views
-
- 2 replies
- 140 views
-
- 0 replies
- 99 views
-
- 1 reply
- 127 views
-
- 0 replies
- 123 views
-
- 1 reply
- 175 views
-
- 1 reply
- 169 views
-
- 0 replies
- 119 views
-
- 2 replies
- 252 views
-
- 0 replies
- 135 views
-
- 2 replies
- 229 views
-
- 0 replies
- 169 views
-
- 2 replies
- 258 views
-
- 1 reply
- 228 views
-
- 0 replies
- 150 views
-
- 0 replies
- 190 views
-
- 0 replies
- 154 views
-
- 1 reply
- 320 views
-
- 2 replies
- 272 views
-
- 0 replies
- 234 views
-
- 1 reply
- 262 views
-
- 0 replies
- 343 views
(82x100).thumb.jpg.36443f765b2b16ea8fddfb4dbdf591df.jpg)
-
Who's Online 16 Members, 0 Anonymous, 743 Guests (See full list)
-
Recent Gallery Images
-
Recent Forum Wide Posts
-
-
By mike_halliwell · Posted
Forgot to add, if that had started as a 24MPix shot it would have become twice as pixelated with that degree of crop. 🙂 -
-
By chuck_foreman1 · Posted
Wow Luis color!"" . this is very good. Love it -
By mike_halliwell · Posted
A lot of wildlife photography, esp. small, shy birds and skittish things like perching dragonflies need almost mandatory cropping. It's surprising just how quickly the pixel count drops with a modest crop. Full frame Z8 48Mpix (scaled to HD page) and then cropped to 1Mpix. Not a great image, but you get the idea. Providing the lens is sharp enough, it's in focus and there's no subject blur (!-!-!) cropping works very well. Taken with a 500mm PF, @ 75m range..... didn't have my 800mm PF or ZTC1.4 ! 1/3200 ISO 640 f5.6.
-
