Jump to content

jc1305us

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    304

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by jc1305us

  1. jc1305us
    I love it. Sharp, nice tones, and very abstract. Well done!
  2. jc1305us
    The final product. The full photo as it should have been. The lab apologized and made it right.
  3. jc1305us
    There are two or three that are Wonderful. The overhead of the man walking on the cobblestone street is excellent. Too bad the dog is a little blurry. The fisherman is excellent too. Nice job
  4. jc1305us
    I have to find a new lab. I used to go to a lab in New York that was excellent, but since I don't work in the city anymore, its just not convenient to get there. Getting the negatives rescanned tomorrow, I'll post what comes up. The film was stored in the refrigerator prior to me taking the shots, so it's not a film storage issue.
  5. jc1305us
    4 is out of focus, and 1 is somewhat unclear as to what the idea is, but 2&3 are good .
  6. jc1305us
    It was Millburn Camera ASAP in Short Hills. Used to go to Bleeker digital in Manhattan, but I just don't get into the city as much as I used to. I went thorough the other rolls they developed and there are more than a few with the same issue. They offered to re scan so I’m happy with that.
  7. jc1305us
    I tried several times to post the actual photo, but for whatever reason, the site rejected it. I’ll try again
  8. jc1305us
    Sent the lab an email, they’re going to rescan them. I thought I was going nuts! I’m not ansel Adams but I’m not that bad a photographer where I was cutting everything off lol
  9. jc1305us
    Not sure what you mean, I shot it on a Rolleiflex using 120 Kodak film. Not sure you can get much more square than that! lol
  10. jc1305us
    Recently received scans back from a roll of 120 I had developed and scanned at a lab in NJ. Thought I messed up and cropped the bottom of the photo when I took the shot. Turns out the negative tells the tale. Why is the scan cropped and the negative ok?
  11. jc1305us
  12. jc1305us
    Hoboken, NJ has some cool details, this being one. I couldn't get a head on shot, as there were telephone lines hanging down in front which would have ruined the shot. Thought about making this black and white but the colors won out. Thoughts? Sony a7ii, ISO 320, f 5.0 200/sec
  13. jc1305us
    The photos are quite good to my eye. To me, black and white was always the solution to bad light. “If the light ain’t right, make it black and white” as I like to say.
  14. jc1305us
    Unbelievable craftsmanship. Shot on my Sony a7ii.
  15. jc1305us
    Germany? There was a park in Munich that looked very similar 🤔
  16. jc1305us
    Gay Street, and Waverly Place, West Village, NYC, 2020. Rolleiflex 3.5E Kodak Ektar
  17. jc1305us
    Good eyes! Yes, a very cool place.
  18. jc1305us
    I like them all, with the exception of the 2 cars racing. Other than that, they're great. Congratulations!
  19. jc1305us
  20. jc1305us
    Shot at a car show, and its man annoying when there's a ton of people milling around and the cars are so close together. My solution? A vignette effect. Does it work? I guess it does. I just can't get the beautiful studio look at a car show, but its the best I could do.
  21. jc1305us

    Shadows

    jc1305us replied to Minox's topic in Seeking Critique

    I really like this composition. It's an excellent photo! Technically, maybe bring the highlights down a bit, but it's still very good. Well done
  22. jc1305us
    The black and white is fantastic! Love this.
  23. jc1305us
    Carnegie Mellon stairs
    An amazing staircase at Carnegie Mellon University featuring Gustavino tile
  24. jc1305us

    Fallingwater

    jc1305us posted a gallery image in Architecture

    Fallingwater
    The famous Fallingwater, Bear Run, PA. The masterpiece of architect Frank Lloyd Wright
  25. jc1305us
    OC Surf Cafe, Ocean City, NJ, August 2022. Kodak Ektar 100, Rolleiflex 3.5e
×
×
  • Create New...