MickSimpson

I am just getting back into photography now that I have retired. Part of my effort is to complete a plan for using filters effectively. I have the following gear: 5DMIII, 16-35 f4L IS USM; 24-70 f2.8L II USM, 24-105 f4L IS USM, 70-200 F4L IS USM and a 28-136 f3.5-5.6 IS USM Macro. Most of my photography is landscape with some “Americana” and a little street. I’ve just started to look at filters and their uses with the goal of maximizing my creativity with ND, circular polarizers, (other?). For example, I see some great work where a photographer uses darker ND filters to extend the shutter time and smooth out the surface of a lake. I have used a circular polarizer in the past with my older 40D to eliminate reflections. I’ve recently found filter kits where a frame accommodates multiple lenses holding interchangeable filters. So, in addition to advice on filter selection (brands, ND, CP, etc..), I seek advice on the type of filter (interchangeable vis-à-vis screw on). Thank you for your help! Mick Simpson

great shots!

Very nice Keefer! I'd say that your getting great results with this lens.

<p>Thank you all for your feedback. I pulled the trigger today and purchased the EF 16-35mm f/4 L IS USM. I can't wait to start using it.</p>

<p>Thank you Gus!<br> This really hit the mark. Looks like the EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L III and EF 16-35mm f/4 L are on par with each other on image quality - sharpness with the differences being speed and price. The EF 16-35mm f/4 L is my Christmas gift to me!<br> Happy Holidays!</p>

<p>Hi Jeff.<br> Great feedback on this; published venue / web & brochure resolution and your experience. I am going with the EF 16-35 f4 L based on feedback. The 17-40 is an older lens that I had not considered due to the comparative performance against the EF 16-35 f4 L. I do other subjects and think that I'll get that edge with the EF 16-35 f4 L while saving some money.<br> Thanks to all for your feedback, and happy holidays to you!<br> Mick</p>

<p>Oops... I just noticed that my original post reads EF 16-35 f2.8 L M2 whereas I meant EF 16-35 f2.8 LMark III vs the EF 16-35 f4 L.<br> Robin: Thank you! I use the 5d MIII for my work. I agree that the IS helps the f4 version. I have the 24-70 f2.8, great lens, but I'm looking for that extra bit of wide angle. Leaning a bit more towards the EF 16-35 f4 L. I could use the savings for more goodies.</p>

<p>Brett W. : I checked Photozone as you suggested as well as a couple of other reviews. The Photozone review of the EF 16-35 f2.8 L III did have comments regarding how it stacks up against the newer lens that I found helpful. I'm leaning towards the EF 16-35 f4 L so far. Factors are price and sharpness - I want the gear that provides me with an edge.</p>

<p>I just signed on to take real estate photos of upscale homes. I know that the EF 16-35 f4 L has a great reputation with RE photographers for producing sharp photos. Has anyone compared the EF 16-35 f2.8 M2 to the EF 16-35 f4 L for sharp image quality?<br> Thanks! </p>

<p>I don't have either of those lenses, but I do have the Canon EF-S 10-22mm and I LOVE IT! I purchased the EF 24-70 f2.8 L (refurbished) from the Canon online store and suggest you look there for the 10-18mm to check the price. The refurbished lenses come with the same support that the new lenses have. Maybe the price will help you. If either the Sigma 10-20 or Canon 10-18 are as good as my 10-22 you will have a great lens.<br> I use my 10-22 on a Canon 40D but that is the only EF-S lens I own. I also have a 5d Mark III and made a decision early on to purchase L series glass exclusively so that I could use it on any Canon body.<br> Good luck with whatever lens you buy!</p>

<p>Lifepixel is a $275.00 conversion for my 40D, $600.00 if you want ultra violet</p>

<p>Hi everyone.<br> Adrian & Laura - thanks for the referrals.<br> Jorge, I am a handy guy but not that brave when it comes to the do it yourself modifications to my DSLR. I'd probably end up with those "extra parts" after reassembly and the bewilderment of what I may have created (destroyed)<br> Mick</p>

<p>I have a new body and want to play with IR using my old 40D but I have no idea where to go for the IR modifications. Any suggestions?</p> <p>Mick</p>

<p>Looks like Ed Mika is back in business and selling his FD/FDN/FL to EOS lens conversion kits. Ed's conversion kits replace the FD/FDN/FL mount on the lens with an EOS mount. You get infinity focus but everything is manual. </p>

<p>Will this work on a telescope?</p>

<p>Thank you for your responses. I have to weigh what you've given me against my goals - a task made more difficult due to your thoughtful responses and suggestions.<br> Best regards.<br> Mick </p>

<p>Hi guys.<br> Hi William. I have no plans to keep the 40D. If I stay with a crop sensor body I would go for the 7DII to enjoy the faster burst rate and better sensor. <br> Fred: I usually keep the EF-S 10-22 on the 40D when I take both cameras out with me. Depending on what I am shooting I will use the other lenses on the 5DIII. On rare occasion I will use the 40D with one of my other lenses.<br> Great point on the 70-200 vis-à-vis the 70-300 Robin. I was thinking of some inexpensive reach, but make the case quite well as these two lenses are pretty close I terms of reach. Also your point makes even more sense when I consider that I will be adding the Sigma 150-600; why bother with the 70-300!<br> Bill, your suggestion about the 5Ds/5Dr is interesting and I’ll give that some thought. I do think that I will wait a bit though to see what the 5DiV brings to the table.<br> Hey an aside here: I’ve always known about the crop sensor factor and effective focal length. I recently saw a video that where the presenter made the point that the argument that you must also apply the crop sensor factor to the aperture. If I apply his argument to my 70-200 f4 he states that the effective result is 105-300 f6. Can anyone confirm? This would be a strong argument against crop sensor in my case.</p> <p >Thanks!</p> <p >Mick</p>

<p>I have a 5DIII and a 40D that I take out together so that I have two lenses ready to go without having to perform a lens swap. I will be replacing the 40D and would like appreciate feedback on continuing with the 5DIII and a crop sensor such as the 7DII; or replacing the 40D with a second full frame such as the 6D or new 5D4 when it arrives later this year?<br> Lenses I own: </p> <ul> <li> <p>EFS 10-22 USM;</p> </li> <li> <p>EF 28-135 IS USM;</p> </li> <li> <p>EF 24-70 f2.8L II USM;</p> </li> <li> <p>EF 24-105 f4L IS USM;</p> </li> <li> <p>EF 70-200 f4L IS USM.</p> </li> </ul> <p>Lenses I’m ordering; </p> <ul> <li> <p>EF 16-35 f2.8L II;</p> </li> <li> <p>EF 100 f2.8L Macro IS USM;</p> </li> <li> <p>EF 50 f4;</p> </li> <li> <p>Sigma 150-600 f5-6.3 DG OS HSM Sport;</p> </li> <li> <p>thinking about the EF 70-300 f4-5.6 IS USM</p> </li> </ul> <p> In order of activity I shoot landscape; abandoned properties and equipment such as barns and tractors; cityscape; macro; wildlife; birds; starting real estate<br> Thanks!<br> Mick<br /></p>

<p>1) I have owned the EF-S 10-22 for quite a while and I ABSOLUTELY LOVE IT! I currently use it on a 40D which will be replaced shortly by the 7DII. the 10-22 has been fantastic for indoor shots and I will be starting real estate work with it. I also own a 5DIII but my widest lens is the 24-70 f2.8 - love this lens too.<br> 2) I really like your picture you linked. Very good.<br> Mick </p>

<p>I own the EF-S 10-22; the EF 24-105; AND THE 70-200 F4 among others and I love them all. I too would be more concerned about the wide end for landscape. I always carry the 10-22 and the 24-105.</p>