Javier Gutierre

<p>I am super happy with my Grey market D-750. No issues what so ever.</p>

<p>I read the release this morning. Bummer....but Dan was spot on.</p> <blockquote> <p >Dan Brown , Feb 04, 2016; 09:20 a.m.</p> </blockquote> <blockquote> <p>They just need to get it right on the first release, the delay is forgivable. But, a batch of cameras with issues might not be.</p> </blockquote>

<p>I purchased the non VC model, but with the internal motor (non screw drive) I purchased mine from a store in Japan <br> <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0013DAWPQ?psc=1&redirect=true&ref_=od_aui_detailpages00">http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0013DAWPQ?psc=1&redirect=true&ref_=od_aui_detailpages00</a><br> This lens now sits permanently in my D7200. I also have the Nikon 17-35 and 24-70F/2.8 and I am here to tell you. This Tamron has equal image quality, perhaps faster focus and is a lot lighter. It required no fine tuning and handles sun flair very well. For the price it is awesome. I just ordered the Tamron 24-70F/2.8 from the same place. </p>

<p>Nikon D7100 with Nikon 35F/1.8<br> <img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/18179878-md.jpg" alt="" width="680" height="450" /></p>

<p>Nikon D7200 Tamron 17-55F/2.8<br> <img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/18182883-md.jpg" alt="" width="680" height="450" /></p>

<p><a href="http://www.dxomark.com/Reviews/Best-lenses-for-the-Nikon-D750-Best-Zoom/Best-standard-zoom-Tamron-SP-24-70mm-f-2.8-Di-VC-USD">Lets not forget about the Tamron 24-70F/2.8. This lens can be had now for about $775.00 U.S. Gray market. DXO rates it higher than the nikon.</a><br> <a href="http://www.dxomark.com/Reviews/Best-lenses-for-the-Nikon-D750-Best-Zoom/Best-standard-zoom-Tamron-SP-24-70mm-f-2.8-Di-VC-USD">http://www.dxomark.com/Reviews/Best-lenses-for-the-Nikon-D750-Best-Zoom/Best-standard-zoom-Tamron-SP-24-70mm-f-2.8-Di-VC-USD</a></p>

<blockquote> <p>People were shooting weddings perfectly well on 400 ISO film not too long ago remember, and for most modern DSLRs 3200 ISO is a walk in the park. So IMO, no you don't need a D750.<br> </p> </blockquote> <p>Brilliantly put and so true. I could only laugh 8-)</p>

<p>I have never shot a wedding nor do I ever plan to. Having said that I do love shooting in some indoor places like union station or old churches as examples. Owning both the the D750 and D7200, I can offer this. I know that the Focus modules and so forth are suppose to be the same in both those bodies. I am telling you they they are not. The D750 focuses fast and very accurate. But where it really shines as Shun said is the low light performance. Atleast a full stop in ISO and that is so huge. The view finder is bright. It is just better. I have a D500 on pre order and I am just hoping it matches the D750 in ISO performance, but I have my doubts. The D7200 kills the D7000 by the way. It is night and day all around. </p>

<p><img src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-mXNlfOOY6IQ/Vq6vnFSKtPI/AAAAAAAAETM/laJP0tok4Zk/s1600/IMGP3729.jpg" alt="" width="1600" height="1061" /></p>

<p>Hi folks.<br> While I do know it is not an underwater camera, it is certainly the most weather resistant cameras that I own. If I am wrong and I kill it, so be it. But honestly, If i felt it would die, I would not do it. I took it out again in another torrential rain storm and again, just perfect.<br> <img src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-3hDF_Rl_bgw/Vq6vlQIHfHI/AAAAAAAAES8/YE9DwW56TZ8/s1600/IMGP3656.jpg" alt="" width="1600" height="1061" /></p>

<p>Canon AE-1, 50 F/1.8, Ilford XP-2<br> <img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/18157133-md.jpg" alt="" width="680" height="450" /></p>

<p>Canon AE-1, FD 50F/1.8, Ilford XP-2<br> <img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/18157134-md.jpg" alt="" /></p>

<p>Canon AE-1 FD28F/2.0 ILFORD DELTA 3200<br> <img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/18179876-md.jpg" alt="" width="680" height="450" /></p>

<blockquote> <p>Too bad that buffalo wasn't a poacher in disguise...</p> </blockquote> <p>I agree.</p>

<p>Hi Folks,<br> I am sure many of you have seen these, but to those that have not, enjoy. Personally, I love old photographs like these. They are rich and raw.<br> <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3422014/The-truth-really-CIA-releases-thousands-declassified-X-files-aliens-flying-saucers-unexplained-phenomena.html">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3422014/The-truth-really-CIA-releases-thousands-declassified-X-files-aliens-flying-saucers-unexplained-phenomena.html</a></p> <p> </p>

<p>From today<br> <img src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-_WW1b0PvWhk/Vq6vj7HsbzI/AAAAAAAAESs/UifKIqiUdsY/s1600/IMGP3638.jpg" alt="" width="1600" height="1061" /><br> -<br> <img src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-3hDF_Rl_bgw/Vq6vlQIHfHI/AAAAAAAAES8/YE9DwW56TZ8/s1600/IMGP3656.jpg" alt="" width="1600" height="1061" /><br> -<br> <img src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-sL8q-3CIIiQ/Vq6vo6xkXgI/AAAAAAAAETk/6FQtVzy5yBM/s1600/IMGP3813.jpg" alt="" width="1600" height="1061" /></p>

<p>Allen Herbert <img title="Frequent poster" src="/v3graphics/member-status-icons/1roll.gif" alt="" />, Jan 30, 2016; 04:53 p.m.....This is awesome. Love the tones and comp.<br /> =<br /> Jane Cave <img title="Subscriber" src="/v3graphics/member-status-icons/sub9.gif" alt="" />, Jan 30, 2016; 08:02 p.m....Simply put. A great street shot. It has all the elements. wwwwhy<br /> =<br /> Eddie Law <img title="Subscriber" src="/v3graphics/member-status-icons/sub10plus.gif" alt="" />, Jan 31, 2016; 08:21 a.m.....Brilliantly fantastic. I love it.<br> =<br> Line Martel <img title="Subscriber" src="/v3graphics/member-status-icons/sub6.gif" alt="" /><img title="Current POW Recipient" src="/v3graphics/member-status-icons/trophy.gif" alt="" />, Jan 31, 2016; 10:06 a.m....Well composed, love the tones</p>

<p>Harry, Number two is awesome. Stunning in fact.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3425037/Amazing-pictures-buffalo-sent-FLYING-like-rag-doll-elephant-digs-tusks-game-reserve-attack.html">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3425037/Amazing-pictures-buffalo-sent-FLYING-like-rag-doll-elephant-digs-tusks-game-reserve-attack.html</a></p> <p>Enjoy. </p>

<p>Pentax ME Super, SMC 28F/2.8, Ilford Delta 400<br> <img src="http://i404.photobucket.com/albums/pp128/jgredline/2016%20Film/Pentax%20ME%20Super%20SMC%2028F%202.8%20Ilford%20Delta%20400%2033.jpg" alt="" /></p>

<p>Pentax ME Super, SMC 28F/2.8, Delta 400<br> <img src="http://i404.photobucket.com/albums/pp128/jgredline/2016%20Film/Pentax%20ME%20Super%20SMC%2028F%202.8%20Ilford%20Delta%20400%2024.jpg" alt="" /></p> <p> </p>

<p>Pentax ME Super, SMC 28F/2.8, Ilford Delta 400<br> <img src="http://i404.photobucket.com/albums/pp128/jgredline/2016%20Film/Pentax%20ME%20Super%20SMC%2028F%202.8%20Ilford%20Delta%20400%2026.jpg" alt="" width="1024" height="679" /></p>

<blockquote> <p>Both Adorama and B&H have excellent return policy for new and refurbished Nikon products alike.</p> </blockquote> <p>B&H yes. They are super cool and excellent. They are the most upright company with super integrity. I love those guys. <br> <br> Adorama is the most aweful place that I have ever dealt with when it comes to returns or help. I have a chain of emails on two different occasions regarding one return for a refund and another for an exchange. Both took over a month to resolve. All with in 2015 Who ever this person ''Red'' is down there is down there is the worst customer service rep ever. This reminds me of the yelps I meant to write regarding my own experience with them. In both cases I ended up buying the product from B&H. <br> <br> Adorama also misleads on there advertising on shipping days. They mean buisness days from the day it ships which could mean weeks like in my case. <br> B&H does not do this. Three days means three days, next day means next day. </p>