michael2

It looks like the Tin Man from the Wizard of OZ is mooning us...good eye.

Just wanted input as to the quality of the digital work of this

piece...is it believable?

I only point this out to soothe the naysayers, who keep balking at how the stitching could be done without people moving all over the place...the answer is they did move...if you look just to the right of the center of the photo, you will find a seam of people that repeat themselves...(see attached pic)I only point this out to answer their question. I beleive that this is truly a magnificent photo, and truly worthy of POW.

I had submitted this once before, but got absolutely no feedback at

all. Then earlier today I saw a photo quite similar to my own, so I

thought I'd resubmit it in hopes of getting a little input...

Like others before me, I have been an admirer of Rene's work for a while now, and can honestly say that Rene has become my favorite photographer on this site. And while I feel like there are other deserving photos in Rene's body of work, I do give an appreciative nod to the elves for recognizing the true talent of this photographer...Now if we could just get the tight lipped Rene to give us a little insight into how these wonderfully moody photos are actually achieved!

I have tried to address the above comments in the attached photo, do the changes enhance or detract from the original?

This was taken at Universal Studios Orlando, how is the composition?

Something about this photo is mildly erotic...

I wanted to try and give this photo the feeling of an actual

portrait, instead of just a photo of a statue...did I succeed?

When I said that the photo drips of photoshop, I meant no disrespect, that wasnt meant to be slanderous. To the contrary, I am a strong fan of photoshop and all that it can do. I was merely stating that with so many "skeptics" out there (myself included) this pictures origin seemed murky...My hat is off to you for doing it the hard way!!!

I am appologizing because I didnt believe that this shot was naturally achieved. It drips of photoshop. I did look further into your folder though and found the parter to this photo which clearly demonstrated this photos natural origin... All I can say is "Good Eye"...you captured numerous elements into one harmonious photo...A job well done.

At first glance it seemed rather gross, but on further investigation, it appears to be smoke coming from his mouth...is that right?

Daniel, I have seen the battery many times as I am a SC resident, and have know it quite well from many of Jim Booth's Paintings. Your photo is qiute close to what you are after I do believe. I think that there are a few minor changes I'd make that make put you where you want to be...

You said you were using a filter...it seems a tad dark and is blocking too much color, I would either go with a lighter filter of the same kind, or possibly try an altogether different sort of filter. also, I cant remember if it is possible from that location, but It seems as if the angle of the shot needs to be slightly more head on,but not too much more. Some of the appeal of the bulidings is lost due to obstructed views. other than that, I think you are very close.

 

Michael

 

PS-I am not too familiar with this sensia film either, if its not slide film, I would consider switching, the vibrant colors of the slide film could be just what you are looking for.

I am no expert but if I were taking this picture, I would make some changes...

#1 you are trying to depict a climber on a rock, which has an intrensic element of danger, currently the climber looks to be a few feet off the ground, thats not necessarily the case, but thats the perception. You need to shoot from a lower perspective, that way the climber seems to be higher up, and your sense of tension is restored. #2 the trees in the background are somewhat distracting. This is a shadow of a climber, he is supposed to be isolated... so isolate him. The sky is a nice touch, but the other elements detract from it. #3 the climber and foreground seems a bit fuzzy,it ought to be somewhat more crisp. In the perfect situation, I would have a vertical picture of the climber, on the rock, shot from a low perspective. The rock would cover the left third of the photo and the climber would be about 1/3 of the way down from the top.Also the climber would be slightly smaller to show his small size in relation to the mountain. The foregound would be much clearer and there would be little or no background clutter, mostly sky. Thats my 2 cents, I hope you can use some of what I have said. Overall its a good photo, it just needs some cleaning up.

I like the concept of the off focus framing, but I feel like it is crowding the bird too much. Had the framing been a little looser with more free area around the bird, I would have liked it better. Good job over all.

A lot of portraits tend to somehow muddle their subject in with their background, this is not the case with this particular shot however. I'm not sure how it was achieved but the girl really POPS from the picture...excellent.

how did you manage an underwater picture with a rebel G? If this was a different camera then you may have limitations that you will not be able to overcome, and thus must compensate or settle. Fixed lens? Fixed focus? Depth? need more input...

I would have opted for a longer shutter speed to try and let more light in. The colors are nice but not as vivid as they could be. overall excellent shot.

From what I remember from my psychology classes in college, the current right hand positioning is supposed to be more soothing. Apparently the mind traditionally prefers right side orientation of objects as opposed to left. Can't remember why...hope that at least gives you a different perspective on the issue.

Eden was right, the focus needs sharpened, other than that, my only other suggestion would be to try and shoot it with a slightly larger depth of field so that you can show the animal in its environment, good first effort.

my guess is a mirror and some really dark shaggy stuff to hide the edge of the glass...

its nice to see a photographer who doesnt always think like a photographer. I myself find it hard to release my preconceptions about photography and have fun, so its quite refreshing to see someone have fun with their camera instead of just shooting life.

This photo seems to convey so many things to me at once. It seems to signify a passage through some dark and harrowing ordeal. So with that feeling in mind, what about " Valley of the Shadow of Death"...if you dont mind the biblical allusion. or if that is too plain what about the prior phrase "Yea Though I walk"? just a couple of ideas.

I like the almost human looking pose of the cat. It seems more indicative of a human subject than someones pet. Well done.

Peter, I am kind of new to the whole photography thing, did you use some sort of graduated filter to get that effect? I like the picture overall but there seems to be a little TOO much difference between the top and bottom. Just my opinion.