Jump to content

peter_fowler

Members
  • Posts

    296
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by peter_fowler

  1. Good choice I'd say , having used one almost non stop for over half a decade . Before spending any further money , might I suggest

    a thin plate of glass over the negatives and then scan . Sometimes with slide film you may get Newtonian rings and sometimes not .

    It works surprisingly well for me . Peter

  2. Must say though Joe , a year or so ago I got the ingredients , real ascorbic acid , digital scale etc. and got good results

    right off the get go .Must be my age , but I don't find the aroma offensive :) . But it's sure a lot quicker to use HC-110.

    To each his own , Regards, Peter

  3. And then there's some of us (me) , that carefully ( I thought ) backed up all his negative scans and stored them

    on a thumb drive ! Drum roll ,hard drive failed and yeah all 1400 of them were there , but only identified with a jpg #

    , crap , who was to know what else you were to do ? Every picture was identified with camera type and date . Ain't

    technology great ? Peter

  4. Now I'm going to have to go back through some pics and see if I can find some from my Welta Weltur .

    They're sure a lot easier to cart around than the other medium format cameras I slug to foreign

    countries ( telling myself I just know I'm going to need a selection of lens , practically never :( ) . Peter

    • Like 1
  5. I've considered an ae-111 for my Etrs , but the price was always high . However , I really miss an in camera

    light meter ( for travel , I use transparency , Provia 100f ) and was wondering about how well they work ? Could you mention the selling price

    of the one you got ? Peter

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...