Jump to content

pradeep satyaprakash

Members
  • Posts

    338
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Image Comments posted by pradeep satyaprakash

    Providence

          3
    Thanks Jim. This photograph was created by combining three bracketed shots. They were taken by using AEB -1, 0, +1. I combined the three in Paintshop Pro to bring out the details in the white stone in the foreground, the details in the shadows on the yellowish rock in the front right of the frame, and also details in the trees. I then made a Gaussian blur layer to give it a slightly misty feeling. This was my first try at doing something like this, and I thought it worked reasonably well. The photo is not that great per se, but the technique worked well.

    Providence

          3

    This photo was taken a while back ago. I brought it up to finalize it

    and bring some meaning to that trip in April of 2004. I worked on

    this image with two others that were exposure bracketed to bring out

    the details in the shadows and the highlights. I know the horizon is

    not level and the photo is not perfect, but I thought you would like

    it nonetheless. As I go further and further in this digital domain, I

    am realizing that mastering the software darkroom is critical to

    bring the best out of one's photographs, and this is an example of

    that process. I am still learning. Thank you for your critiques,

    comments, and thoughts.

  1. This portfolio is called "Digital Renaissance", but this will be the

    end of that. This is my foray back into film photography. But this

    time, using classic rangefinder cameras from the 1960s and 1970s. I

    took this photo while testing a newly fixed Canonet GIII-QL17 camera.

    It is difficult to go back to film after shooting digital for the

    past two years. First the cost - almost $0.42 per printed exposure.

    Second, the lack of feedback. That really kills me. Normally if I

    shot this in digital, I would use my histogram to decide exposure.

    With film, all I have is the click of the shutter and my imagination

    to provide for thoughts about my image. Third, the depth of field is

    not as before. With digital, I am used to have wide depth of field

    due to the smaller sensor sizes. But with a "full-framed" 35mm

    camera, and that too, a very small Canonet QL17 with a 40mm wide

    angle lens shot wide open in low light really brings back my lessons

    about depth of field. That is film. I am not sure if I love it

    anymore liked I used to. Or maybe I need to reacquaint myself to this

    old friend and lover.

    About the photograph. I was in an old dusty warehouse that is

    probably 40-50 years old. It is an old granite sawing and polishing

    factory that has been decommissioned for those purposes. This

    warehouse is open to the environment and over the years, all sorts of

    human detritus has accumulated on the inside of it. These objects,

    after being coverd with dust and dirt over time take on a different

    type of look. One that is both sad, barren, cold, austere, and

    elemental at the same time. So I was walking around testing my camera

    and finishing off this roll of film when this chair next to some

    cinder-blocks caught my eye. The chair is fairly small, so it looks

    like that something a child would use, but a child in a factory? The

    chair, the background, and the dirt floor all added to the sense of

    punishment or loss. As if someone who once sat on that chair was

    banished from society and human contact and would have to spend their

    time on this uncomfortable and bleak chair as atonement for their

    sins. Maybe it reminded me of all the chairs I have sat on as a child

    when I was being punished in school for doing something. The chair in

    the corner, the "time-out" chair, and the "dunce" chair. Looking at

    that chair reminded me of how we impose our values of right and wrong

    on something and other people, and we banish people to these

    punishment chairs as they come and interact with our lives. But why

    do we punish? What do we gain from that? What do we lose? Maybe this

    punishment chair is just a testament to what we lose when we try to

    punish others into our own world views and experiences. Maybe this

    punishment chair is our chair. Maybe my chair. My punishment chair.

    Gotcha!

          2

    Thought this would be a fun photo for you guys to see. My cousin's

    family was visiting us over the Christmas break in 2004 and he was

    tossing his little kid up and down for fun. I caught this right as

    the little guy was starting to come down.

    Rest in Peace

          6
    Thanks for your explanation. Yes, some fans of Elvis can be scary. I am a fan, but not a scary one. This was my first visit to Graceland and I was a bit underwhelmed. I had envisioned it in my mind differently, but what I did like was the prescence that place has. It is uniquely Elvis and has all the class, excitement, tackiness, and sillyness that embodied the man. I think I became more of a fan after visiting Graceland than I was before I visited it. Cheers.

    Untitled

          4
    I've been to this exact same place! I remember Arches/Moab so fondly. Visited them in January 2000. Picture is good, but not very interesting. Well exposed. Nice sky. Nothing interesting in foreground. Were you stepping on cryptobiotic organisms to take this picture? :^P
×
×
  • Create New...