Jump to content

nishnishant

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    872

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by nishnishant

  1. nishnishant
    <p>Peter, the 7200 has faster focusing than the 7100?</p>
  2. nishnishant
    <p>5 months now, I guess consulting a lawyer would be a good thing to do now. </p> <p>Unlikely you'll see your photos, but at least you can get your money back. </p>
  3. nishnishant
    <blockquote> <p>The 70-200/4 should work nicely with the D7200 but with a D750 and 300/4 you gain about 1 stop in sensitivity in low light over the D7200+70-200/4. </p> </blockquote> <p>Is this because of the larger sensor?</p>
  4. nishnishant
    <p>I am not qualified enough to answer you, I am sure others here will. But I thought I'd double check with you that you've not used your real name here? If you did, I'd recommend changing it right away. </p>
  5. nishnishant
    <p>Thank you, Shun and Chip. </p>
  6. nishnishant
    <p>Hey Shun, do you know what's the 10-30 equivalent in 35mm?</p>
  7. nishnishant
    <p>Thank you for the detailed responses, William. Appreciate it. </p>
  8. nishnishant
    <p>This is the photo in question :</p> <p>http://www.photo.net/photo/17861439&size=lg<br> <p> </p>
  9. nishnishant
    <p>Amateur question here. The image that won second prize - wouldn't that normally be considered a little over exposed? Does that not matter for creative wedding snaps?</p>
  10. nishnishant
    <p>I think most folks can tell apart a phone image from a DSLR image. But it's far less likely that they'd be able to tell apart a well framed, perfectly exposed shot from a slightly over/under exposed auto-mode shot pic. </p>
  11. nishnishant
    <p>It's partly a marketing ploy I would guess. The market sees a company constantly updating their models, so every 6-9 months a new model's out. This improves public perception that it's a good idea to buy Nikon as you'd get a newer technology model than from say a competing company that releases new models only once every 2 years. </p>
  12. nishnishant
    <p>How about getting her a flash?</p>
  13. nishnishant
    <p>This is scary. It's almost as if, to be safe one needs to hire two wedding photographers - for redundancy (and the safety that comes with that).</p>
  14. nishnishant
    <p>If you have a full time job and all you expect is to break even with your part time wedding photography (where the weddings pay for new cameras, lenses, flashes, etc.) I'd say go for it. It's the best way for you to extend your hobby, specially an expensive hobby like this. And who knows, maybe you'll gain enough skill and experience that one day you may actually be able to go full time with it. </p>
  15. nishnishant
    <p>Funny that pro-shooters insist there is not enough of a market and yet amateurs get dozens of offers asking them to shoot weddings and receptions :-)</p>
  16. nishnishant
    <p><a href=" <p>Not sure what to say here really! Anyone here ever experienced anything like this?</p>
×
×
  • Create New...