Jump to content

nishnishant

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    872

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by nishnishant

  1. nishnishant
    <p>Remote + timer?</p>
  2. nishnishant
    <p>This one is very good : http://www.photo.net/photo/18294588</p>
  3. nishnishant
    <p>If only 8% of the pics are off focus, that's not bad. Assuming you snapped 20 photos, that still gives you 18 good pics. Unless you meant 80%?</p>
  4. nishnishant
    <p>Looks like it was shot at 1/100s, f/5.6, ISO 6400. A faster lens would have helped you use a lower ISO. And would also have helped with the auto focus (in low light).</p>
  5. nishnishant
    <p>The amazing thing here is that you still have Firefox installed :-)</p>
  6. nishnishant
    <blockquote> <p>Nikon D7200 is virtually ISO-less. That means it does not matter much what ISO you shoot, lifting exposure in post yields the same results as raising ISO.</p> </blockquote> <p>Huh? Could you elaborate on that?</p>
  7. nishnishant
    <p>What would be the purpose of having 4 lenses?</p>
  8. nishnishant
    <p>As a non-pro, I think you should offer them 25% back. That would be the right thing to do and a great PR move. You could mention that legally and contractually, you only owe them $18 but you are doing it out of empathy for them. </p>
  9. nishnishant
    <p>Did you report this to the police?</p>
  10. nishnishant
    <p>No sample images yet?</p>
  11. nishnishant
    <p>Uhm, what would they sue you for if you gave them those photos? I am not sure I understand. </p>
  12. nishnishant
    <p>The site's loading really slow for me right now, not sure if anyone else experienced that.</p> <p>[edit] - Looks like it's hosted in Europe, so that may be a factor. </p>
  13. nishnishant
    <p>At cropped level, the D500 looks best, followed by the D750, followed by the 300S. Thanks for the post - this sort of stuff is always good to see. </p>
  14. nishnishant
    <p>61,000 shots? That seems quite high. But if it works well, I guess it's okay. </p>
  15. nishnishant
    <p>Eventually the wedding photography business could be narrowed down to wives of doctors and attorneys who do it not for the money but for fun :-)</p>
  16. nishnishant
    <p>Perhaps, try offering discounted pricing via groupon to gain some market visibility?</p>
  17. nishnishant
    <p>How about <strong>engagement reenactment</strong>?</p>
  18. nishnishant
    <p>Why do photographers give people low res images? I understand not giving RAW files. But surely giving them a JPG at 100% resolution makes sense? Or is the noise more visible at that size so they have to resize to make the image look better?</p>
  19. nishnishant
    <p>Does anyone know if these DL cameras are selling well? I can't see the pros, semi-pros, or serious hobbyists buying them, and the amateurs will just use their phone cameras. So, who's the target audience here?</p>
  20. nishnishant
    <blockquote> <p>The other alternative is the undercut everyone else which will eventually drive you out of business.</p> </blockquote> <p>You only need to undercut everyone else of the same or higher quality. Basically, be the best value for that price range. </p>
  21. nishnishant
    <p>Make sure of these 4 things and you'll get excellent performance.</p> <ul> <li>SSDs, both for the boot drive and for your work drive.</li> <li>24 GB or more memory</li> <li>6-core or if you can afford it 8-core i7 CPU</li> <li>Top of the line video card with 4 GB memory</li> </ul>
  22. nishnishant
    <p>Pair that up with an f/1.2 lens and you can now take photos in pitch blackness I guess. </p>
  23. nishnishant
    <p>@William W</p> <blockquote> <p> 35mm F/2 Nikon</p> </blockquote> <p>Nikon has an excellent 35 mm 1.8 AF-S lens for the DX format. So that may be a better fit for the APS-C sensor camera you recommended. </p>
  24. nishnishant
    <blockquote> <p>A relevant fact is: F/22 @ 1/100s @ ISO 25600 ≡ F/5.6 @ 1/100s @ ISO 1600, which means that both those shots could have been made at ISO 1600.</p> </blockquote> <p>Could someone throw more light into this statement? Thanks. </p>
  25. nishnishant
    <p>Oh ok, thanks. Damn - I have a 7100 :-(</p>
×
×
  • Create New...