chip_chipowski

<p>I currently have a few Speedlights: SB-700, SB-800 and SB-28.</p> <p>I don't really use flash very often, but I just bought a Nikon SB-400 for convenience. I figure I have three full size Speedlights, so I should diversify. The SB-400 will be useful in situations where small size is convenient. I see my current line-up as follows, but in no particular order: (1) SB-800 has good power and good endurance with the extra fifth battery carrier; (2) SB-700 has a nice interface and a good balance of size/power; (3) SB-28 is good for manual work with good power to size ratio. </p> <p>By the way, I might be completely wrong in the way I characterize the flashes above (these are just my general impressions). </p> <p>I cannot decide. Seems like I should get rid of the SB-700. Other than the interface, is SB-700 superior in any way? SB-800 has the nice benefit of compatibility with film, although I don't use the film/flash combo often. Looking the other way, does SB-700 really have any major sacrifices relative to SB-800? I can live without TTL on film (or use SB-28). I am pretty sure I don't need high power from my flash. <br /><br />I would love to get some comments on SB-700 vs SB-800 to help me here. Thanks!</p>

<p>"Take full advantage" is pretty subjective. Since the OP really liked the 18-270 on DX, it makes sense to get a similar set-up for the D750. Nobody is going to recommend a superzoom for highest image quality. It is a pricey set-up, but I am guessing a D750 w/ either 28-300 will take respectable images. </p> <p>Nancy, I do not have experience with these lenses but I have read good things about both of them. Just in case you do not aware, I have two comments. First, these 28-300 lenses will not give you as much telephoto reach as the 18-270 mm on your crop sensor (270mm on crop sensor is equivalent to something like 400mm on the D750). Second, the Tamron is f/6.3 at the long end versus f/5.6 for the Nikkor. If you can live with f/6.3, the smaller size of the Tamron would be nice. Here is a comparison:</p> <p>http://camerasize.com/compact/#567.329,567.314,ha,t</p> <p>That shows the Tamron 18-270, but it looks like it is the same length as the 28-300 (3.8"). </p>

<p>Anastasia - I have a 3 year old and my most used lens for kid photos is a 30mm f/1.4 - by far. There are lots of good thoughts on this thread, probably a little overwhelming if camera gear is not your thing. I would tend to agree with your friend about adding the 35mm f/1.8. It is relatively inexpensive and should allow you to take photos indoors without using flash - which is difficult with your kit lenses. Good luck with the kid!</p>

<p>Cash, do you have experience buying and selling on Craigslist? I love Craigslist - I have completed many camera transactions and my experience has been almost exclusively positive. However, I think it is advisable to have your wits about you throughout the process. There are lots of subtle aspects to a Craigslist transaction and you need to be on the lookout for red flags and green flags.</p> <p>In your case, the D750 kit is a $$$$ camera so the stakes are high. I agree with Michael - you should know why the person is selling. Does the scenario seem reasonable? The price is also an important piece. If the price is way below ebay pricing, you should have your guard up. Good luck!</p>

<blockquote> <p>simple. the 15-30 doesnt have to go to 14mm.</p> </blockquote> <p>The Tokina 16-28 doesn't have to go to 14 OR 15 - must be even better ;)</p>

<p>Like Rodeo Joe said, some (all?) macro lenses show you the effective aperture. My Tamron 60mm only shows f/2 around infinity. If my focus distance is relatively closer - like 10-15 feet, the effective aperture generally reads 2.2 or so, even when wide open. </p>

<p>Beach Fly-By</p><div></div>

<p>Rodeo - I think the estimate says 2hrs labor (which is apparently multiplied by the labor rate). </p>

<p>Number 2</p><div></div>

<p>#1</p><div></div>

<p>Sounds great, Bob. I did not grow up in the era of manual focus film cameras, but I have enjoyed using an FE and FE2 over the last few years. I have heard great things about the F2. These old cameras are a pleasure to operate! It sounds like you got rid of your old MF Nikkors - now you can experience the joy of acquiring a whole new set. </p>

<p>#1</p><div></div>

<p>(Awesome shot John Farrar.)</p> <p>Cannon Beach, OR</p><div></div>

<p>Congrats Manuel! I would love to make the same transition at some point. I have my eyes set on D700 as well. Please share any observations about your experience moving from DX to FX. If you are going from D200 to D700, I would think that is a huge advance in many ways.</p>

<blockquote> <p>when I made my statement about an issue with the lens</p> </blockquote> <p>Brian, were you relating a first-hand experience with this lens or passing along something you heard? If I recall correctly, it was the latter - hence Shun's comment.</p>

<p> #2</p><div></div>

<p>#1</p><div></div>

<p>Wouter and Pete - thanks for your comments. The infinite MP concept is helpful for me to visualize this distinction.</p>

<p>Javier, you might be interested to read this <a href="http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2013/04/sigma-30mm-f1-4-dc-hsm-vs-sigma-30mm-f1-4-ex-dc">comparison</a>.</p>

<p>Rainy Portland Morning</p><div></div>

I have the original 30mm and I love it too. I think the new version has a closer MFD so that would be nice.

<blockquote> <blockquote> <p>DX cameras doubtlessly take great pictures if you don't need them printed too big....<br />Having a bigger FX sensor behind it produces more megapixels to print or view at home.</p> </blockquote> <p>Comparing a D750 with a D7200, I fail to see where the more megapixels are coming from? </p> </blockquote> <p>A fair point re MP Wouter, but aren't there more factors at play than MP count? I don't have any experience with FX, but I would think a 24MP FX image will look "better" than a 24MP DX image just due to the amount of enlargement involved. </p>

<p>Right, Ilkka - there are lots of long lenses on the compatible list. It looks like some of the incompatible lenses are older versions.</p> <p>Here are some of the long lenses listed <strong>compatible</strong>:</p> <ul> <li>AF VR Zoom-Nikkor 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6D ED</li> <li>AF-S NIKKOR 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR</li> <li>AF-S NIKKOR 200-400mm f/4G ED VR II</li> </ul> <ul> <li>AF Nikkor 180mm f/2.8D IF-ED</li> <li>AF-S NIKKOR 200mm f/2G ED VR II</li> <li>AF-S NIKKOR 300mm f/2.8G ED VR II</li> <li>AF-S Nikkor 300mm f/4D IF-ED</li> <li>AF-S NIKKOR 300mm f/4E PF ED VR</li> <li>AF-S NIKKOR 400mm f/2.8E FL ED VR</li> <li>AF-S NIKKOR 400mm f/2.8G ED VR</li> <li>AF-S NIKKOR 500mm f/4G ED VR</li> <li>AF-S NIKKOR 600mm f/4G ED VR</li> <li>AF-S NIKKOR 800mm f/5.6E FL ED VR</li> </ul> <p>Edit - I just noticed that page shows some lenses are compatible with the FT1 but not with the J5. That is odd.</p>

<p>By the way, I understand the FT1 adapter only supports autofocus with AF-S lenses and it is limited to the center AF point.</p>

<p>Bebu - <a href="http://imaging.nikon.com/lineup/acil/lenses/mount_adapter_ft1/">this</a> is the adapter</p>