shots worth sharing

<p>I think it's very plausible that he's seen (and handled) the upcoming release.</p>

<p> </p>

<p>I think it's very plausible that he's seen (and handled) the upcoming release.</p>

<p> </p>

<p>Good for you, John! We has a perseid fail here in Baltimore, too.</p>

<p>Clara & I went to the county fair with Abe & his family yesterday. My advice is, take a DA 15 to the fair,<br>

<img src="http://dadipentak.smugmug.com/photos/i-hhkPtSF/0/XL/i-hhkPtSF-XL.jpg" alt="" /></p>

<p><img src="http://dadipentak.smugmug.com/photos/i-pf649mB/1/XL/i-pf649mB-XL.jpg" alt="" /></p>

<p>Also something in a bit longer--like, maybe, the DA 35/2.8 ltd macro<br>

<img src="http://dadipentak.smugmug.com/photos/i-dKS5ZXJ/0/XL/i-dKS5ZXJ-XL.jpg" alt="" /></p>

<p> </p>

<p>Looking at your stats (impressive exercise, btw), I had to think, "FA 31/1.8 or DA 35/2.8 Macro." From my pov, zooms are very useful and a great way to start out but once you've gotten a feel for what you shoot most, it's time to think about going for really high IQ at that FL. Nothing against the 55-300--it's a high value lens. I just don't think it adds much--either in terms of range or IQ--over what you've got. </p>

<p>That Glover Park event looks like it was great fun, Yury--nice set!<br>

I also like your B&W, Frank! Dalia?</p>

<p>More from our Quebec trip: Riviere-a-Mars--all taken with my new Sigma 8-16. </p>

<p><img src="http://dadipentak.smugmug.com/photos/i-djJDvRM/0/XL/i-djJDvRM-XL.jpg" alt="" /></p>

<p><img src="http://dadipentak.smugmug.com/photos/i-VNV5d6X/0/XL/i-VNV5d6X-XL.jpg" alt="" /></p>

<p><img src="http://dadipentak.smugmug.com/photos/i-PDSZbS3/0/XL/i-PDSZbS3-XL.jpg" alt="" /></p>

<p>It's certainly quieter here than it's been in the past. To be honest, while I feel a sense of loyalty to p.net because it was so helpful as I was getting started in photography, I've been spending more of my on-line time over at the Pentax Forum, which I find more feature-rich, lively and useful. </p>

<p>I'm processing photos from our recent trip to Quebec(not done but getting there.) Here are some of my faves so far:</p>

<p>DA 35/2.8 Macro<br>

<img src="http://dadipentak.smugmug.com/photos/i-Sv9CB7v/0/XL/i-Sv9CB7v-XL.jpg" alt="" /></p>

<p>Sigma 8-16/4.5-5.6<br>

<img src="http://dadipentak.smugmug.com/photos/i-QpDr3nN/0/XL/i-QpDr3nN-XL.jpg" alt="" /></p>

<p>Sigma 100-300/4<br>

<img src="http://dadipentak.smugmug.com/photos/i-tJHpZ5D/0/XL/i-tJHpZ5D-XL.jpg" alt="" /></p>

<p>I have had similar frustrations with one of my Sigma HSM lenses as well, PJ. </p>

<p>I had a DA*300/4 and didn't have any problems (that I was aware of--I tend to attribute issues to user error.) In fact, I liked it a <em>lot</em>. I only sold it because I was moving on to something longer (and had 300mm covered with the Sigma 100-300/4). </p>

<p>Late as usual (but still only page 2--I guess everyone's at the beach ;~)</p>

<p>For your amusement, here's a zombie heron. This is from my first outing with flash & a Better Beamer: I've got a<em> lot</em> to learn! <br>

K-5, Sigma 500/4.5 & 4.5x TC.<br>

<img src="http://dadipentak.smugmug.com/photos/i-jpJ5qFC/0/XL/i-jpJ5qFC-XL.jpg" alt="" /></p>

<p>This is a back-yard shot with the Sigma 70/2.8 macro. <br>

<img src="http://dadipentak.smugmug.com/Nature/Fauna/i-JfxmcSH/0/XL/IMGP1989csmu-XL.jpg" alt="" width="900" height="643" /></p>

<p>and Clara with the DA 77/1.8<br>

<img src="http://dadipentak.smugmug.com/photos/i-kvcz7vw/0/XL/i-kvcz7vw-XL.jpg" alt="" /></p>

 

<p>That's a lovely and very meaningful photo, Kathy. I imagine it wasn't easy for you but it's wonderful that you were there to give her comfort & care in her final days.</p>

<p>We've got a storm approaching so l hope I can get these in before the power goes out again.</p>

<p>Sigma 500/4.5<br>

<img src="http://dadipentak.smugmug.com/Nature/Fauna/i-ghcP885/0/XL/IMGP3726csmvu-copy-XL.jpg" alt="" /></p>

<p>Sigma 70/2.8 Macro<br>

<img src="http://dadipentak.smugmug.com/Nature/Fauna/i-cWgMRMF/0/XL/IMGP3675csmu-XL.jpg" alt="" /></p>

<p>Sigma 70/2.8 Macro<br>

<img src="http://dadipentak.smugmug.com/Nature/Floras/i-C98h73W/0/XL/IMGP3640csmu-XL.jpg" alt="" /></p>

 

<blockquote>

<p>Hi Dave, love the B&W silvery tones and holes in the leaves. I'd clone out the ripped leaf in the upper right.</p>

</blockquote>

<p>Thanks, Michael--bit of schmutz there. I should have brushed it away before shooting. I'll give cloning a try. </p>

<p>Tough assignment, Kathy--I admire your commitment.</p>

<blockquote>

<p>Pentax has a rather large selection of lenses,</p>

</blockquote>

<p>Sure--if you include the legacy lenses but the line-up of lenses in production has some serious gaps (and over-laps) </p>

<p>Have you considered exorcism?</p>

<p>Nice work as always, folks! Now that the power's back on, I can post a few from the past week.</p>

<p>Sigma 70/2.8 Macro<br>

<img src="http://dadipentak.smugmug.com/Nature/Floras/i-nQQB2m4/0/XL/IMGP3512bwsmu-XL.jpg" alt="" /></p>

<p>Tamron 180/2.5 (Adaptall)<br>

<img src="http://dadipentak.smugmug.com/Nature/Floras/i-FPFkSxq/0/XL/IMGP3530usm-XL.jpg" alt="" /></p>

<p>Sigma 500/4.5<br>

<img src="http://dadipentak.smugmug.com/Nature/Fauna/i-WCnwCwM/0/XL/IMGP3567smu-XL.jpg" alt="" width="900" height="643" /></p>

<p> </p>

<p>There's nothing worse than trashing a good legacy lens (and I speak from hard experience here--very hard experience.) It's one of those things you know St. Peter is going to bring up in the discussion of your admission to heaven.</p>

<p>It ain't AF, but consider the A 35-105/3.5--it's sharp built like a tank and also quite quirky.<br>

--</p>

<p>Perhaps somebody brought the globally depressed consumer demand to their attention.</p>

<p>Bummer, Howard. Since this is probably not covered by warranty, third party repair (KEH or Eric Hendrickon) would also be options. </p>

<p>I got nuttin' this week but figured I'd check in to see what's up. It's great to see you're enjoying CR, Doug--those are neat shots The WB seems off a bit: I'm guessing that's due to processing in the field. I like the peonies, Howard and your poppy, Marcus. Also the hydrangeas, William--especially the last. It's good to see the gardens are as beautiful as they were during my time at UNCC. Rural Oregon looks a lot like Pennsylvania, John--nice landscape! I think your Ganges photo is just outstanding, Anirban! </p>

<p>I got nuttin' this week but figured I'd check in to see what's up. It's great to see you're enjoying CR, Doug--those are neat shots The WB seems off a bit: I'm guessing that's due to processing in the field. I like the peonies, Howard and your poppy, Marcus. Also the hydrangeas, William--especially the last. It's good to see the gardens are as beautiful as they were during my time at UNCC. Rural Oregon looks a lot like Pennsylvania, John--nice landscape! I think ypur Ganges photo is just outstanding, Anirban! </p>

<p>I hope it's for the K-01 (and successors) only. I can't see how yet another fast (ish) 50 makes any sense otherwise. </p>