vetterhome1
PhotoNet Pro-
Posts
5,985 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Everything posted by vetterhome1
-
-
-
-
-
Exposure Date: 2016:01:17 16:49:39; Make: NIKON CORPORATION; Model: NIKON D750; ExposureTime: 10/1000 s; FNumber: f/5; ISOSpeedRatings: 100; ExposureProgram: Not defined; ExposureBiasValue: 6/6; MeteringMode: Pattern; Flash: Flash did not fire, compulsory flash mode; FocalLength: 40 mm; FocalLengthIn35mmFilm: 40 mm; Software: Ver.1.01 ; ExifGpsLatitude: 48 49 48 48; ExifGpsLatitudeRef: R98;
-
InTheLonlyHour - please view larger
vetterhome1 commented on vetterhome1's gallery image in Fine Art
-
-
InTheLonlyHour - please view larger
vetterhome1 commented on vetterhome1's gallery image in Fine Art
-
InTheLonlyHour - please view larger
vetterhome1 commented on vetterhome1's gallery image in Fine Art
Arthur,, thanks, yes its a main question to ask: what are the differences between “pure” photographs, corrected photographs, treated photographs or even manipulated photographs and paintings? Let me try to define the difference between treated photographs and paintings. Treated photograph: The dominating detail information and the total structure were on the film (sensor) in a single shot, only a substructure is added. A painting ? We know what it is. Good luck when visiting the dentist! By the way, everyone can get InTheLonlyHour for free if I have a working e-mail. It will be a great pleasure if it will be on walls around the world. BR JV -
InTheLonlyHour - please view larger
vetterhome1 commented on vetterhome1's gallery image in Fine Art
-
-
InTheLonlyHour - please view larger
vetterhome1 commented on vetterhome1's gallery image in Fine Art
-
-
-
InTheLonlyHour - please view larger
vetterhome1 commented on vetterhome1's gallery image in Fine Art
-
InTheLonlyHour - please view larger
vetterhome1 commented on vetterhome1's gallery image in Fine Art
-
InTheLonlyHour - please view larger
vetterhome1 commented on vetterhome1's gallery image in Fine Art
Arthur , thanks for the experiment. Yes indeed “ the result shows the marked difference between the healthy trees and those that seem to have been attacked (as the leafless branches seem to show).” We have been creating different versions including BW. It is a great learning process. I agree “Perhaps Fred's point regarding absence of drama or impact in the original is maintained in these modifications “. BR JV -
InTheLonlyHour - please view larger
vetterhome1 commented on vetterhome1's gallery image in Fine Art
-
InTheLonlyHour - please view larger
vetterhome1 commented on vetterhome1's gallery image in Fine Art
-
InTheLonlyHour - please view larger
vetterhome1 commented on vetterhome1's gallery image in Fine Art
-
Exposure Date: 2012:04:03 16:29:32; ImageDescription: ; Make: SONY; Model: SLT-A77V; ExposureTime: 1/250 s; FNumber: f/5; ISOSpeedRatings: 200; ExposureProgram: Aperture priority; ExposureBiasValue: 0/10; MeteringMode: Pattern; Flash: Flash did not fire, compulsory flash mode; FocalLength: 35 mm; FocalLengthIn35mmFilm: 52 mm; Software: SLT-A77V v1.04; ExifGpsLatitude: 50/1 58/1 35329/1000; ExifGpsLatitudeRef: N; ExifGpsLongitude: 13/1 54/1 4248/1000; ExifGpsLongitudeRef: E;
-
InTheLonlyHour - please view larger
vetterhome1 commented on vetterhome1's gallery image in Fine Art
Saad thanks, your treatment suggestion is impressive, but doesn’t reflect the contradiction LIFE-DEPTH strong enough. A great hint from you is your finding that the duck plays a great rule. Its exactly in between and has not only the chance to fly to the depth area and life area: it has a chance to fly in the bright sky to another future (not shown here). That’s the imagination, or isn’t it. BR Joerg -
InTheLonlyHour - please view larger
vetterhome1 commented on vetterhome1's gallery image in Fine Art
Fred thanks, yes indeed we can ask it is still a photo or it is now a painting? It’s a cropped photo with a treatment: color and texture. Nothing was retouched, or brushed, even no distortion was corrected. The structure of the image is point by point taken by the sensor. Often we are accepting that photographers extremely retouch photos, correct details etc. However, I agree that the final image has a touch of a painting. Have a great 2016. BR JV