Jump to content

ken_dunn1

Members
  • Posts

    368
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by ken_dunn1

  1. I am a still photographer that is going to try some digial grabs for

    a customer of mine (mosly landscape kinda stuff for filler) and was

    wondering about which unit to purchase. Easy to use, light, good

    wide angle, great colors are I guess the most importaint. THinking

    on the Sony DCR-VX2100 right now, will this get professional

    results? Lookin for the Canon 20D of video, lol

  2. if it is a moonless night try about 4 hours at 5.6, that should be in the ballpark. I have used this and the exposures are pretty close, although something always seems to screw up my picture, usually airplanes. Be sure and use a film that can take that kind of exposure like E100 family. Good luck.
  3. I guess I have came up through the ranks like a lot of professional

    photographers, hobby for years, part time for a few more, now I was

    offered a huge contract that let me go full time pro. It will last

    about 6 months, make a really good amount of money during that time,

    and get more work from them later. I have a few other customers

    that I also work for. I started doing nature photography which got

    the attention of some local tourism people, which led me to work

    with an ad agency (small) that has expanded me into lots of

    different areas, notably healthcare. The big contract I have is

    part of a tourism project. So now I have to get busy and be a pro

    and here is one of the problems I am facing. I am in a small town

    (only big town is 100 miles away), maybe 5000 people, not really any

    other photographers other than maybe one other portrait (which I

    really don't want to do much of). I want to do commercial, but I

    need to know if I need to focus on certain areas that are my strong

    points like tourism, or do I need to do it all and promote it all on

    one promo piece (I am about to get something published to promote my

    photographic services). Should I show wedding, nature, healthcare,

    tourism, etc together or do I need to specialize? Any other

    suggestions?

  4. I guess I should have made it clear that in my area it is Amish, and I have asked and they turned me down very matter of fact. The link to the article is exactally what I was talking about, I don't think people have a right to take photographs of children if it makes them uncomfortable, which you can tell in the photographs it did, and there were no parents around. I know if my 13 year old daughter came in and told me someone was following her taking pictures I would be really upset and he if he didn't have a good explaination, he would be have to bend over if he were gonna take anymore pictures with that camera. I photograph kids all the time, my biggest customer is a federally funded tourism project, but I also make sure they are very comfortable and I always get permission from parents.
  5. I don't know what you mean about the other kids not having the same rights, I think they all do, its just that their parents, as far as I know as a religion, don't object. Also just becasue NG does it does not make it right. I am not picking on him either, I thought I was careful not to be too hard on him about it. I was just making a point and wanted to know what others thought, and obviously some agree because he has gotten some feedback about it.
  6. I saw where Reichmann had some images up now of some Mennonite kids

    going to school that struck close to home with me. THe images where

    great, but I have passed on some great shots of these folks becase I

    felt it was not moral and it is against their belief and I respect

    that. He makes it clear that what he done was legal because they

    were in a public place, and he also states that it was moral for the

    same reason and the fact that it was not commercial. HOwever he

    puts the pictures on his website that sells his video, so I am not

    so sure that it is not commercial. Also I find it questionable to

    photograph children knowing that the parents would not approve. If

    he had been photographing kids in a city park and the parents asked

    him to stop and he didn't he would be asking for big trouble. He

    says they were not harrassed, but also says hints they were made

    uncomfortable (and what kid on a country road would not be if a

    stranger stops beside them and points a camera at them). I just

    want to hear what others say about it.

     

    http://www.luminous-landscape.com/locations/school-days.shtml

  7. Well, I had a 10D and shot some digital beside my film camera and like the film better. Everytime I bring this up I get flamed, but hey, I have shot like 20,000 digital pictures in the past year or so, but I like film better for nature. Buy yourself a good used OM2 or something for $150 and a good lens (I bet you can buy the OM bellows and close up lenses now on the cheap, best there are) and load it with Velvia, if you know what you are doing you won't be sorry, or better yet buy a used Mamiya 645 for next to nothing, add an 80 and a 150 with Nikon 5T and 6T and get results that will blow your mind.......could do all that for less than $1000 including a fair tripod (all used of course) (avoid the J body as it has no mirror lock up)
  8. I like the Blue RIdge Parkway between the Smokies and Asheville. You always hear that its crowded too, but I have not had any real problems. I am afraid we have had so much rain this year that it will screw our color up.
  9. "open vista with blue skies and vibrant autumn color".....I think you just answered your question there. You are looking at the colors. I think that if you said you were hiking with lots of interesting trees with textures and leaf patterns or something like that, B&W may suit you. I shoot Mamiya 645 and can carry an extra back if I need to, but now I just do it in photoshop. An extra rebel body would only weigh a few ounces and take up very little room as well.
  10. I have printed about 15 prints that average 16x24 and the two of the ink carts show 80% while the others still show full. Also consider that I am sure it used a lot of ink to prime the printer that will not be used when changing carts (The carts don't set over the printhead). I have heard that these printers are much less expensive to operate than Epson (they need no cleaning cycle like the Epson do because they use a different technology) and they just need less ink to print for whatever reason. What finally made me buy the printer was that I emailed a guy that had both and he said the only reason he had the Epson was because it would take really thick stock and he had a need to do that from time to time (I think it was really thick, like cardboard). The prints are wonderful, the paper is really great and here in the states its (the paper) the same price as Epson, so you may want to dig deeper into that. The paper has a really nice heavy back, almost feels like canvas. If you get it plan on using roll paper, it seems to work much better, but I have gotten the hang of sheets a little better. I have never been able to get the rear sheet feeder to work, I don't know how you would line it up, there is no tray, just a slot and they expect you to stick it in there straight! Anyways, it is a very affordable alternative to the Epson, and I can't imagine the prints looking better as I feel inkjet has gotten so good that I think it will take a different process to improve much.
  11. OK, bought it and it makes wonderful prints, as good as anything I have seen. The sheet feeder is not much, but the roll paper works great and the cutter does a good job. The software is OK, a bit confusing, but you get the hang of it (even tho you pick roll paper you still have to size it for the cutter). Has tons of papers to pick from in the profile, and it seems to be dead on as far as color matching the monitor right out of the box. Any more questions just ask.
×
×
  • Create New...