ken_jeanette1
Members-
Posts
853 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Everything posted by ken_jeanette1
-
<p>Wonderful as always. </p>
-
repair suggestion for Miranda Sensomat?
ken_jeanette1 replied to bcfuchs's topic in Classic Manual Film Cameras
<p>There is a site Miranda Historical Society, but it looks like they haven't been active since 2004<br> They do have this statement: As far as I know, there is still no definitive book on the history and products of MIRANDA CAMERA CO, although several of the serious collectors have been preparing material for some time. The books below are contemporary to the Miranda, best found in Half Price Books or other used stock stores. Sometimes these books come up for sale on www.ebay.com, too.<br /><br /> There are also magazine articles, but I have not yet started a comprehensive list of these. If you can read Dutch, the initial article listed offers a good historical overview of the models and major accessories. Contributions and additions to this list are, of course, most welcome. <br /><br /> For service manuals, a number of these are available as copies through Oldtimer Cameras in the UK. I'll list and comment on the ones I know about..And list this---under service manuals---<strong>Sensomat - IMHO the best generic Miranda manual, with good troubleshooting sections and usually clear illustrations </strong>-----So, a trip to ebay, or if oldtimer camera has a site----Good luck---Love Mirandas, they were loaded with features at bargain prices.</p> -
<p>This came to me as I was reading everyone's comments. (Sorry to hear of your bad luck Karl) Would anyone have an opinion about using the commercially available food storage systems? I mean the ones that vacuum out all the air, and seal a plastic bag or rigid container.</p>
-
Question for Habitual Selfie Takers
ken_jeanette1 replied to Sanford's topic in Casual Photo Conversations
<p>ZZZZZZZ</p> -
The Tri-Lauser'd Lustreflex
ken_jeanette1 replied to John Seaman's topic in Classic Manual Film Cameras
<p>It's a decent lens, I must say. I think you're correct thinking the lousy attitude came from the name. On another note, Is anyplace safe from the tagging and graffiti? These morons should have the word MORON tattooed on their forehead if caught. How can someone take their turf and make it look so damn crappy. Like we want to see their drivel plastered on every nook and cranny.</p> -
Kodak North-America camera list Wordfile
ken_jeanette1 replied to MathewDH's topic in Classic Manual Film Cameras
<p>That's quite an effort. Thank you!</p> -
<p>Perhaps if you put a few drops of lighter fluid on the hub of the self timer, let it sink in, then a few more for good measure, it may loosen that grease. Then a gentle push to get it moving.</p>
-
<p>I have to say, it's threads like this that make me keep coming back here. Ingenious people, Products hand made, to make the old things work, helpful comments. What more is there in a hobby?</p>
-
50 Years Ago - August 1965
ken_jeanette1 replied to marc_bergman1's topic in Classic Manual Film Cameras
<p>As always, an enjoyable read. thank you for posting.</p> -
Mystery lens haze on Elmar 50mm f2.8
ken_jeanette1 replied to alex_downes's topic in Leica and Rangefinders
<p>Looks like age related haze to me. Should be able to remove it IMO. Clean gently. But keep in mind no matter what you do, you probably can't make it worse. I've gone so far as to remove the front element, and using a rock polish slurry in my palm, been able to remove some nasty cleaning marks, and the lens still came up taking great photos. Maybe a little extra "glow", but perfectly acceptable.</p> -
Autochromes from the 1920's
ken_jeanette1 replied to John Seaman's topic in Casual Photo Conversations
<p>Love the soft quality of autochromes. Today's films and digital are sharp as a tack, but miss that ethereal quality. </p> -
People moaning and whining about cameras - why?
ken_jeanette1 replied to Ian Rance's topic in Casual Photo Conversations
<p>And everything you read on the internet is absolutely true and believable! The internet says so.</p> -
<p>I was into stereo for years, from the stereo cards, to mounted slides. The easiest way to view them is with the hand held lighted slide viewers. Realist red button comes to mind, and I think they may be a little pricey now. As everyone said, you'll have to do your own mounting. I never had one, but I've heard that the stereo projectors worked, but sometimes produced vertigo in the person viewing. I have a Fujifilm Stereo digital that I used a few times. Interesting that it gives a 3D image to the LED viewing screen on camera. It also has a viewing digital Photo frame, that projects a stereo image without the need for glasses. I haven't tried that yet, as I have kind of left the camera to languish in a drawer for a couple years. </p>
-
Rondine A nice little toy
ken_jeanette1 replied to donald_miller5's topic in Classic Manual Film Cameras
<p>Nice old gem. I like the effect of the color in the photos too. Looks like some vintage tri-color photos I've seen. That's what I like about this forum. It doesn't have to be an ALPA, or Hasselblad, the most mundane cameras still pique interest. Great post. Thank you.</p> -
Which camera do you most regret giving up?
ken_jeanette1 replied to rapyke's topic in Casual Photo Conversations
<p>I've given up so many cameras that I regret, my list would fill two screens. To name just a few.<br> M3, Norita, Kiev88, Fuji 645 folder, and on and on and on. I guess I'd rather focus on what will be the next into the coffers. They usually say this about women, but if you've had one, you want them ALL!</p> -
VERY Poorly packed expensive camera from B&H
ken_jeanette1 replied to ray .'s topic in Casual Photo Conversations
<p>That kind of attitude, and service is what makes me go back to B&H for my company purchases. Not to mention that they ALWAYS beat other suppliers in delivery time. Keep up the good work Henry!</p> -
VERY Poorly packed expensive camera from B&H
ken_jeanette1 replied to ray .'s topic in Casual Photo Conversations
<p>I purchase for our company, and we use B and H for a lot of items, large and small. I've never received an item that wasn't overpacked. In fact, sometimes it's aggravating to have to wade through the oodles of bubble pack they use. But always packed very well to protect the items. I'd definitely return the item, because you never know when some concealed damage is going to rear its ugly head, and with a $6400 precision instrument, that becomes even more important. As far as the truckers handling the goods, that is a complete disaster. I've received so many packages that appear to have been put through a crusher I can't count them, and it's not limited to one carrier. They want to move volume, forget that it might be a cherished or delicate item.</p> -
<p>Excellent work. I particularly like that sepia boat. Very retro. C44 was a good little camera. I'd warn against trying to use any of the interchangeable lenses. Maybe it was just my ham handedness, but I totally messed up my C44R trying to change a lens.</p>
-
The Agiflex - The Camera I Daren't Use
ken_jeanette1 replied to John Seaman's topic in Classic Manual Film Cameras
<p>Excellent post, really informative. Beautiful outfit to have found, in such good condition. My vote would be to use it. As they said, if you never use it, it might just as well be broken. Funny thing, is it actually MAY already be broken. How would you know. There goes that old Schrroedinger's cat again. I say photograph one live and one dead cat, then put it up on your shelf.</p> -
A Look Back - 2015 Index April - June
ken_jeanette1 replied to marc_bergman1's topic in Classic Manual Film Cameras
<p>Great Job Marc, keep em coming. </p> -
Diabetic in a candy shop
ken_jeanette1 replied to donald_miller5's topic in Classic Manual Film Cameras
<p>And where did you say this shop was located? Street address, City, state, phone number, website if available will be all I need.</p> -
quick easy simple any filter to any lens mount
ken_jeanette1 replied to donald_miller5's topic in Classic Manual Film Cameras
<p>I used to import my own Russian cameras, and it was an interesting scenario getting them. It was a Russian firm that would sell to individuals. You spent months waiting for whatever you ordered, but it eventually arrived. Brand spanking new from the factory. Usually, they came packed in a thin plywood box, with hand written address cards glued to the outside. Then inside, there was the factory packaging, and the distinctive odor these seemed to emit. I guess I could have ordered from a supplier in GB, but it felt more authentic to import my own.</p>