jasonsmith894

This is a very intriguing thread. I too remember when ratings were not annonymous. I wasn't aware there was an issue with revenge ratings, but I could see that happening. I do recall that when the ratings were not annonymous that you were much more likely to get an explanation for a low rating. That, in my opinion, was much more helpful than the current system in which ratings can seem entirely random. I do recall though that overall ratings seemed to be higher then (I remember more ratings in the 5-6 range; though my images may have been better back then!!) I agree with some of the comments above about the small group of raters doling out 3s. I also appreciate hearing how others rate images, and admit my views are not far off from David's view. Honestly, I find the whole rating system to be frustrating, but feel compelled to request ratings to increase the visibility of my work. As others have said, the critiques offered are far more valuable. Unfortunately, many images recieve little to no feedback and sometimes comments are not that helpful. I try to offer feedback on images that need additional work, but this is time consuming and I don't have a ton of free time. I also struggle with how to leave feedback on many of the images in the critique forum as some are simply snapshots and I don't have much to contribute; I also worry anout being too critical as i would never want to discourage anyone from continuing with photography. Anyhow, I'm glad someone started this thread and I enjoy reading the thoughtful comments about the rating system. I too will continue to seek and give ratings, but know the system is flawed.