sai
-
Posts
254 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by sai
-
-
excellent work, very human. Sad but treu history.
best regards
simon
-
Hi everyone, I posted a question not long ago about macro lenses and it was
very helpful to learn new things spesially the term working distance. That got
me thinking though. As far as I understood, the longer the focal lens the more
working distance you get. That?s clear. But does a 100mm gives you more ratio
(e.g. 1:1 v.s. 1.3x ) that the 60mm? I mean, if you focus at the minimum
distance available, do you get more ratio? I?m guessing yes, right?
-
Thanks for the responses =) yes I was thinking on getting the 100mm, but now Michael opened my mind. Is there really a big difference between Canon and third party lenses, like Sigma, or Tokina?
-
Hi everyone, I?m dying to buy a macro lens! I study biology and I?m very
interested in taking pictures of plants and insects. I?ve been looking at the
Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM and the Canon EF-S 60mm f/2.8 Macro USM. The
60mm gives me a 1:1 ratio on my 350D but the 100mm is only US$100 more
expensive and it?ll give me some more! Any comments on any of these lenses is
welcomed, I have read many reviews but I want to hear something from more
people.
gracias!
Simon
-
Thanks a lot you guys! I'm going for the 17-85mm. I forgot to mention but I also have a 90-300mm lens that will cover the rest. Thanks again for the comments and feel free to write back,
cheers
simon =)
-
Hello everybody! I have a 350D with the not so good 18-55mm lens. I'm looking
for an everyday shooting and I have found this two:
EF-S 17-85/4-5.6 IS USM
28-135/3.5-5.6 IS USM
the EF-S 17-85/4-5.6 IS USM has IS 2nd generation (3 stops of IS) and the 28-
135/3.5-5.6 IS USM has 1rst generation (2 stops) I shoot mainly handhold so
this can be an issue.
My camera has the 1.6x crop factor, so it really means 27.2-136mm V.s 44.8-216mm
Do you think I'll miss the wideangle very much with the 28-135/3.5-5.6 IS USM?
I own a peleng 8mm as well that could do the job.
They are more or less the same price (+/- $500).
Any comments.
thanks
Simon =)
-
Hi, first of all, Alex I�m sorry. I had just used the $%&$! converter for the first time and I was stressed. Sorry for talking you like that.
Mike and Alistair, I tried what you said, focusing something very close, but still nothing. It does look like a magnifying glass in a thick filter mount, I think. I�ll attached a pic for you to see it.
Keith, you are right, hard work and creativity and practice are more important than any lens.
I think I�ll just put this thing away and shoot with the lenses I have. Maybe I�ll use it as a magnifying glass.
well so it�s life, I learned the lesson, no screw on things.
cheers
Simon
-
Well Alex excuse me if not all of us can spend fortunes on expensive lenses and have to do what we can with consumer ones.
Want to buy me a better one, go ahead
-
Hi you all, I bought a 2X converter, wich you screw onto your lens. I thought
I was gonna get a good result, I know about the lost of quality, but I�m
really disapointed =( , it�s crap, it doesn�t give the 2X factor they promise
and I can�t focus. I tried it on a 18-55mm and on a 90-300mm, with not so
worst result on the first one.
Does anyone knows some tips or anything to make it a bit better? I tried
screwing it directly to the lens and with a UV filter, but...
Anyone? I�m sad
Simon
-
I didn�t have the noise reduction enable in my camera, I do now. It helps a lot! Also this Noise Ninja and Neat Image are awesome, they really get rid of most of the noise =)
thanks to all of you
cheers
Simon
-
Hi Rainer! Thanks again for all the help. The links to the images taken with both lenses were great, and yes, I�m defenitively looking for the efect that the Peleng causes. Thanks again, now I�m gonna try to find a good/cheap one on ebay...
best wishes
Simon
-
Hi Rainer! oops sorry =) I was talking about the distortion that fisheye lenses typically make. What is the diference with a circular image? would that be a 360 degrees images? or 180? I�ll look for images on the web taken with both lenses thanks again
Simon
-
Hello, I�m looking for a fisheye lens or a fisheye converter. There
are a couple on ebay and I was wondering wich one would fit my
necessities better. First option is the Peleng 3,5/8mm (200�),
second is the ZENITAR EF 2,8.16mm (130�), and a third one is a Hama
or other make 0.4x converter (40�). I have an EOS 350D with a 1.6x
crop factor. I want the round fisheye efect, and I don�t the best
way to get it. Would I get it with the Zenitar 16mm (actually 25.6mm
in my camera)? Or is it better the Peleng 8mm (12.8mm)? Although the
price increases a lot. What about a Soligor 0.15x converter? Is
there too much of lose of quality? Would I get vignetting? Those are
normaly for 52mm filters mine has a 58mm.
I�m really lost, any enlighten?
thanks
Simon
-
Hi you all! thanks for responding! To those who suggested, taking several pictures with shorter exposure times and then putting them back together, How? Photoshop I guess, but...?
And no I haven�t use or heared about Neat Photo or Noise Ninja, what era they?
thanks :)
-
Good day! I�ve been experimenting with bulb shooting lately, but
there�s something that�s bothering me and it�s the noise I get. I�m
shooting with an EOS 350D set up with ISO 100. Is there any way to
get less noise, than the one I�m getting. The example below was
taken with the following: Tv 2157 sec and Av 5.6, ISO speed 100.
Any suggestion are wellcome, thanks
Simon
-
Hello you all, I was wondering if you could shoot infrared pictures
with an EOS 350D.
Can you? What do you need, or need to do, to do it?
thanks
Simon
-
Ok, thanks to all of you!
Mark U: I�ll try your technique, sounds easy and cheap!
Matt Miller: Mirror Lock Up? Why does that helps me? I don�t really understand what it is.
Alistair Windsor: do you mean freehands earpieces? that�s a very good tip :)
thanks again
Simon
-
I�m wondering if any of you guys knows if there�s a way of shooting
in B exposition without having to have the shooting button pressed
all the time. There�s no way I can get a sharp picture because of
the trepidation. May be with a remote control? I would prefer if
there�s a way without having to buy anything else, but I�m all ears
I have an EOS 350D.
thanks
Simon
-
Hi you all! thanks for all the answres! Well I was looking on ebay for the lenses you recommend , and the Peleng 8mm is 200 � , the zenitar 16mm is around 130�. But would a 16mm really have a fish eye with a 1.6 crop factor? Will I get the espherical effect I�m looking for? Or is the 8mm better?
thanks again!
chao
Simon
-
Hi you all, I bought a EOS 350D recently and I want to expirience a
bit with fish eye photos. But a Canon one cost around 450�! And it�s
not like I�m going to use it every day! What if I buy a converter?
Will I lose to much quality? thanks for the answers!
Simon
-
Hi you all! thank you so much for taking some minutes to answer my question, altough there was no question in specific. Your advices on the 350D are great , I think I?ll buy it in the next month or so, just need to safe a bit more. I?ll let you guys know when I get the camera,
many many thanks again!
Simon
-
Hi you all , I?m not a profetional photographer, but i enjoy taking
pictures all day long. I now have a Olympus C3030 Zoom, 3.3 MP,
which takes awsome pictures! But I have always dreamed of the EOS
Rebel 350D, but I don?t know if it is too much for me. Can someone
give me an advice? I pretend to take pictures for me and family but
if there is a good one i might try on an exposition.
tanhk a lot
simon
Canon MP-E 65mm f/2.8 1-5X Macro Lens for Canon SLR Cameras
in Canon EOS Mount
Posted
Hi everyone! just one question: what is this lens, Canon MP-E 65mm f/2.8 1-5X
Macro Lens, and what is the difference with a normal macro lens?
thanks