pteppic
-
Posts
48 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by pteppic
-
-
Ilford have now discontinued the SFX. Grab it while you can.
-
Well, I could have sworn it was FirstCall, but they appear to have now removed these films from their list.
-
7 day shop only seem to do HP5 in bulk. Great for the other half (student) but not for myself...
Thanks for the suggestion though. Anybody else?
-
I'm currently looking for a supplier of bulk film in the .uk.
Specifically, I recently saw a supplier that did their own 36 exposure
rolls and bulk rolls of the major films (Ilford HP5/FP4, Agfa ACROS,
Tri-X) for discounted prices.
Problem is I can't find them again, and I can't remember for the life
of me who it was.
So I ask the community - do you know who this ghost supllier is, or if
not, could you please advise to the availible of Fuji ACROS 100 in
bulk in .uk?
Thanks,
Kian
-
I get two Minolta X-700s, one with an MD1 motordrive fitted, a 70-210, 50mm, 24mm and 35-70mm comfortably in there with a flash grip, vivitar 283, a few filters and holders and other stuff. I haven't as of yet, managed to really fill the bag to bustling. Height wise, the 700 with the MD-1 takes it upto around the 6 inch mark and I see no problem. There's no strain on the zip either.
Should be fine.
-
Thanks very much. Indeed it does answer my question, all I have to do now is find one...
-
Hey folks.
One of my all time favourite lenses is a 70-210 Vivitar S1, one of the
early ones - a glorious piece of kit. However, I'm after a 2x TC for
it, for the occassional bit of nature photography I do (210 on it's
own is a little short...). What I would like to know is, is there a
matched TC for this lens? Or will a generic 2x TC do just as good a
job? Can people recommend a TC that isn't going to lose out *too* much
on optical quality and contrast.
Thanks,
Kian
-
Humm, looking at all the reviews - looks like I'm going to have to save up and get the Viv S1. Thanks for all the help, I'll start putting the pennies in the bank :-)
-
Oh Gods, I can't believe how much this thread has carried on...
The film industry is cutting out the dead wood. Film, digital, it doesn't matter what you shoot. Film has its advantages, and also its limitations. As does digital. A large format film image scanned on a drum scanner is going to trump a digital image 9 times out of 10. You can set up a large format camera in the studio, but can you reliably use it at a football match?
One minute we have one company declaring they're no longer making a particular emulsion. On another side we have another company declaring that they may be going into liquidation by the end of the way (and as a side note they'll go into administration, be bought by a larger firm for a cut down price, downsize the company and then use it as a subsidary). Does it really matter?
Film isn't dead. It may be dying. But you're dying, I'm dying - we're all getting there slowly. Nothing lasts forever. Eventually the Mona Lisa will crumble away, and eventually those silver back and white prints will start to breakdown. But it's a medium that is availible to us now, and has a future for at least our lifetimes (and I'm in my 20s, so I hopefully have got quite a bit of a lifetime to give).
I would be more worried about propreity RAW formats on digital cameras... They're more likely to expire before film does. Hell, some of the earlier digital cameras are already more than obsolete - they're inaccessible.
Clinton, since we appear to keep stock by equipment:
2x X700s, 1x x300
80-210 Vivitar Series 1
50mm f1.7 MD
24mm f2.8 MC
45mm f2 MD
28-70mm f3.5 MD
Not a huge collection, but one I enjoy.
If you want to judge me by my photos please look here: http://www.visualperceptions.org.uk/gallery/
I work as a software developer for a financial firm that specialised in voluntary arrangements, liquidations and bankruptcies. Before leaving university, my dissertation and degree was in computer science with a heavy bias towards digital imaging (my disseration was looking into new full frame autofocusing techniques). And I'll tell you now, the kit I worked with then is now considered obsolete, and that was only two years ago.
Oh, and a leaving gift for all the level headed people out there:
***** PLEASE DO NOT FEED THE TROLL *****
-
Don't do what one of my friends did and try the touch/taste test on the hotshoe trigger. Really, don't.
Apart from doing the cleaning drill, I found the contacts on my inner battery gauge went short after a while. This was easily rectified by simply extending the connectors with a pair of needle nosed pliers. Slip the battery pack back in and Bob's your uncle - we have power.
-
Is that the f2.5 or the f2.8 one?
-
I'm a young (22), manual focus Minolta shooter (currently using
X-700s), looking to obtain a used 90mm macro lens. The purpose of the
lens is for outdoor/indoor portraiture, macro work and some basic
indoor sports photography. I currently have the list down to three
lenses:
Tamron SP 90mm f2.5
Vivitar Series 1 90mm f2.5
Tokina-ATX 90mm f2.5
I've been told that these lenses are optically identical, is this correct?
The second question is one to do with mechanics. I've owned, with bad
experience a Tamron 70-210 f2.8, and it's handling swore me off
Tamron. I replaced it with a Vivitar Series 1 80-210 f3.5 which just
*glides*. I had problem mounting and unmounting the Adaptall that
came with it and the focusing action was diabolical to say the least.
But then a friend leant me a prime Tamron SP lens of his, and the
handling felt much more solid and reliable. Can anybody comment on
the mechanics of the Tamron lens, and are the problems I had typical
of these lenses? The 90mm SP appears much more regularly than any of
the other lenses and usually sells for a more agreeable price (<100
GBP) than the others.
Thanks again,
Kian
-
Am I right in saying that 800 pushed by two stops gives it an EI of 3200?
And am I also right in saying that 1600 pushed by an additional stop
also gives it an EI of 3200?
I'm asking since my Minolta X-700 only goes upto ASA 1600, and I
require to set it to ASA 3200. So I'm guessing the easiest way is to
add an additional stop from the 1600 position on the +/- scale.
-
Wotcha, I've been a wild fencer for many a years (and I've spent all
my money on whisky and beer)... and a few years ago I took up
photography. Now I'm attempting to put the two together and try to
photograph fencing bouts. However, it seems to be a right royal pain
in the ass to say the least. Last time I tried, I used 3200 Fuji
Superia film, and had Godsawful grain results that made me cry.
Fencing events are usually poorly lit, are almost always fast paced,
and need to be shot from between six feet and twenty feet away. I use
a Minolta X-700 with a Vivitar Series 1 70-210 f3.5 lens and the
compulsory autowinder, but I could really do with some advice for film
speed and manufacturer and recommended advice for shooting in low
light. No flash units are allowed.
Thanks,
Kian
-
Scott: Some of us do, whoops - that's the day job.
-
I've been looking around for a lens in approximately the 80-90mm range
for portrait work. Obviously, first choice would be an F2 MD 85mm
lens, but after finding a price tag on one for ?289, I thought this
was a little steep. Does anyone have any suggetions for a lens in
this *classic* length that isn't likely to cost me a small fortune and
require me to cry over my credit card?
Tamron 90 2.8 macro - good portrait lens?
in Sony/Minolta
Posted
The Tamron SP 90mm F2.5 cycles around Ebay enough to keep it fresh. Keep your eyes open, there will be around in a week, two at the most. Caveat Emptor with anything from the world's biggest dustbin, and if the seller didn't advertise as "fresher than a fishmonger on a Sunday" then I wouldn't touch it with a twelve foot tube of custard.
It *is* a good lens, but it's not the only lens in it's class. The Tokina AT-X 90mm f2.5 and the Vivitar Series 1 90mm f2.5 are also excellent glass and mechanics.
Personally, I've had Tamrom mechanics and I wouldn't touch it with a barge pole again. The Adaptall may seem convenient, but I've had enough aperture and mount jams to never want to grace it's presence again. I own the Series 1, with the matched 1:1 adapter (both lenses I mention have a matched adapter), and it's an absolutely fantastic lens. It makes a goregeous portrait lens (just watch the flare) and an absolutely superb macro lens.
Try to be flexible and you'll find yourself with a good piece of glass in no time.