knut_schwinzer
-
Posts
902 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by knut_schwinzer
-
-
-
<p>Barry, I hope I do not offend anybody with this manipulation of your shot, please forgive me!<br>
It was just too tempting to emphasize your OP!<br>
Maybe great for her dog stylist, too;)</p>
-
<p>Charlie, of course! And if you continue like that, one day you will emulate the whole Holy Bible in just one picture. By that time people will say: One pic tells more than a thousand prophets;)</p>
<p>Hi Barry, please give her a hint how to complete her outfit...</p>
-
-
<p>Ray, really dusty pic, you really hit the colors!<br /> Eddie, your patient woman as beautiful as always, but please post the Iphone pic to see your camera better;) <br /> Very wiggly Kois out there!<br /> Robin, nice lateral light & tonality. Looks almost scientific IR.</p>
-
<p>Now...</p>
-
<p>...and wild life:</p>
-
-
<p>Hi Benjamin, I want to apologize for the rudeness in my last message here. <br /> And, your entries look a bit too ingenious - with a little research on Google or in the archives here you could have figured it out in one hour - and what surprises me is that there is no noticeable appreciation from your side to people who dedicate forty-plus lines to your vastly complex inquiries. <br /> It felt to me like you are stumbling into a candy store to ask the owner about his odontological philosophy, then walking out of the door not even saying goodbye.<br /> Anyways, welcome to us mostly old RFarts which are happy to have anything to respond to!<br>
Come back, enjoy and get a hang on this tools or not.<br>
Otherwise, there's always a horseback riding forum which would happily help you to understand why they sometimes don't use cars.</p>
-
<p>+1 Mukul. If you would start out your RF experience with a FED and lens cheap from the bay, with a little bad luck you might get FED up and toss the RF towel anyway. </p>
-
<p>Domke FX-5 and the other camera ready to shoot across the body.</p>
-
<p>Gleat lefelence Gleg!!!<br>
"A guy told me (...), too expansive, meaningless, not well known anymore, poor optical quality, and etc."<br>
A guy! Not well known anymore! Pool quality! Mean ingless!<br>
I think the troll is gorged.</p>
-
-
-
<p>Interesting thread, and so is the avalanche of elaborated posts!<br /> Sandy, neg diagonal of 24x36 is 43mm or thereabouts, so a 50 feels a little longish, for many. To tell the truth, most old nominal 50mm Summicrons are even a wee bit tighter, at 51.9mm (Read 52mm).</p>
<p>So, basically, a 35mm lens gives you a perfectly natural view with a little bit of crop margin to put lines straight...</p>
<p>Industrial standards of a "standard" lens were much more accurate in most other formats than 135, like 75mm in square MF. A 40mm in 24x36 might be the perfect all-around-one-lens option, if there is such.<br /> Hope that helped! Cheers, Knut</p>
-
-
-
<p>John, at the contrary, you just made a new friend! I absolutely agree. And - as far as recommendations went, please note that Jean's request is cost limited!</p>
-
<p>Mukul, that was frank. End of bla bla. I share your opinion. </p>
-
-
-
<p>Barry, your last entry reminds me of Jim Trahan lost to large format long ago; and of course of Ralph's Lustrum Press.</p>
-
-
<p>Wendell, yes.</p>
Why people still using Leica digital M?
in Leica and Rangefinders
Posted
<p>Hang on...this thread is still alive & kickin'!!!<br>
Forgot my "wild life" entry re-do, gateway was lost lately...</p><div></div>