Jump to content

dchatter

Members
  • Posts

    1,066
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Image Comments posted by dchatter

    away

          2

    I think you're too far away, the nice composition elements notwithstanding. Also, there appears to be quite a few blown out areas---perhaps the digital effect ;-)

     

    Best regards.

    city walk

          2

    I like the graphic composition quite a bit, but there's just too much contrast, almost hurts my eyes. If there's bright sunlight, I'ld like to see a crisp shadow, and in any case, such a shadow will only add to the scene.

     

    Best regards.

    Sun, sea, ecstasy

          3
    That is what I call a really nice capture of `life.' Canonical, and no exaggeration here; perfect exposure. I think you should concentrate on `street life' a little more; it comes naturally to you.
  1. Congratulations for the POW!!! Sublime indeed. I think the title and Philipp's first comment above should be read. The picture conveys his thoughts succinctly, traditional composition rules and blah-blah-blah can take a back seat.
  2. @John: No, I didn't write anything in jest at all. The geometry in the streets fascinates me a lot. For a while I've been shooting expressions, but I'm inclining more towards the raw geometry. An adequate synthesis of drama and geometry is, for me, the perfect recipe for a street photograph, and there's plenty of both here.

     

    However, I wish there a little more contrast in the middle grays---there's too much of it, spread over too large an area; I think my discomfort is primarily due to the grass and the comparable dresses of the trio. I hope you don't mind my criticism; I'ld like to see this `jump' out, for it's not a picture comparable to a beach-side scene in the evening.

     

    Best regards.

     

    @Matt: I had asked John a similar question, which he'd answered below one of his pictures; I don't remember which one though, I've got a terrible memory. It'll be a useful pointer to put here I believe.

    Faces of Chicago

          7

    Hi Kasturi, this film was developed in very traditional manner, no surprises here: TriX 400 rated at 1600 and pushed 2 stops in HC110 dil B. Temperature was maintained at 68F (roughly). Printed 8x10 with 40Magenta on variable contrast paper. Rest is just the lens :-)) Frankly speaking this print scan is pretty bad.

     

    I actually wanted to ask you how on earth do you get that level of grain in your pictures?

    Untitled

          4

    Location is certainly well-known, but the picture is pretty original :-) I just wish there was a little better separation of the person and particularly the umbrella.

     

    Best regards.

×
×
  • Create New...