emmett_s

Phil P - Yep! That's the concept. An incident meter reads the light arriving on the subject. That way the subjects shade(snow? coal?) won't fool the meter into thinking that the subject is 18% grey.

Lynn Jones for President! I could not agree more. I really really like the simplicity of Ethol UFG and I love the results.

Xtol shmectol ....we don't need no stinking Xtol!

Digtal shooting wore me out, (computer, computer, computer)also my work looked blah...my 'tweaking' skills aren't what they needed to be. So back to MAMIYA 645 and glad of it.

To Daved Henderson - Amazing work thanks for the inspiration

IMHO looks superb!

Jon what developer did you push that image in?

Here's a thought buy the US stuff with all the $'s we save at Walmart buying all things Chinese

I'm in love with Digital Gem Airbrush Retouching from a Kodak owned company www.asf.com.

Jaimie - Do you mean FULLY manual, or AutoThyristor Manual?

What Tim Holte said....

I have used them and am very happy. Extremely good prints from film and digital, and very reasonable pricing.....have not done any albums with them yet..........

Despite all the knocks against this lens, I used it at a recent wedding. I have 11x14's at iso 400 f5.6 that look phenomenal! I was very pleasantly surprised....so now I'm wondering if an upgrade will really blow me away.

Before I book a Wedding (and it's in writing) the bride must tell me who is at the top of the heap, me or the video person, or the DJ with the digital point & shoot. Then we all live by the rules, sometimes I'm Number Two, but I can plan for that going in.

At one wedding a gal with a Handycam blocked me all during the ceremony. I walked up to the the Videographer with his huge rig atop a tripod and said"How did ya like the bridge troll in my way?"....only to learn later it was his wife...Ugh!

Photoshop is like the old colgne comment...if you think you're using you much, then you're using too much.

Does this work if I have the CA-1AF module(which is the EOS

dedicated module) with the New Canon 20D. If so can someone tell me

how? When I tried it the flash appeared to fire full blast, which

left me using an non TTL setting. Thanks

Yikes....I got a Canon 20d for Christmas, and have shot a maybe 200 images, and (...YAWN...) I want film! THe delicate part is going to be telling my bride thanks but no thanks......Any suggestions?

Like it? I love it ...And the Alternative Cake Shot with the woman holding the Digital camera is brilliant (IMO)

Just wonderful! How about sharing the technical side of things...camera? film? digital? etc. etc. Nice work!

If you'd "gone digital" you'd STILL be sitting at the computer playing with density, color, contrast, "curves", cropping, and all the other crap that my digitized friends feel they gotta do to their proofs - Al Kaplan For President!!!

Somebody help this fellow - because I am in the same boats. Been selling proofs and negatives and have had 3 couples come back this month asking me to do the whole album thing! Great for income but I too am a complete novice at this. I Have tried Candid2000 and one couple is happy but the enlargements are lacking. Other labs making enlargements from negatives(optical) have done a decidedly better job. Please help!(adn thank you)

Keh will be fine!! they are 100% honest. PS:I got burned badly buying a HAssy on eBay

Marc - do I detect your 'skin so soft...' treatment on this image?

Gratuity? You get a gratuity? Sheeze....I get someone clearing their throat when they write the check.

Receiving line pics and guests dancing pics are so monotonous....every so often I get a gem, but that phase of the wedding shoot is boring with a capital "B"

Note to Jon Witsell - could you be any ruder?

Hans knows what he's doing and had a failure...no need to be so critical.