jwcounts
-
Posts
39 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by jwcounts
-
-
So a few days ago I was in Utah and my Nikkor 50 mm 1.2 lens fell into a creek.
it was completely submerged and I guess it sat there for about a minute, and by
the time I realized what happened there were two or three drops of water on the
inside glass. over the next couple days the water condensed and made little
droplets all over the inside surface. Now I am back home and the condensation
is starting to clear up but the aperture blades don't seem to be working, i.e.
it is stuck wide open. So what do I do? I have never had this happen. Is it a
major problem or can it be easily cleaned/repaired? who should I send it to?
what should something like that cost to fix? btw the water was very clear and
free of sediment. any advice would be greatly appreciated.
-
-
Steve B I'll take that lens!
-
hmmm...I'd have to disagree with that last statement. Modern ideas are formed in response to previous ideas. It seems to me that an understanding of history can add greatly to one's understanding of modern thinking, in any subject
-
I think everyone is an artist. In order for something to be art, someone just needs to call it art. Any other definition seems arbitrary.
The difference lies in the quality of the art- obviously some artists are better than others. Anyone who takes a snapshot of their kid is an artist, just not a very good one. Most of the time, good art requires some thought put into it.
Fashion and advertising photography are definitely forms of art. But people don't always care about the "artistic" aspects of a shot (composition etc.) because they are simply trying to make an accurate recording of what something looks like.
-
-
I picked up an ARSAT 20mm for about $150. I've never tested the quality, but it works alright for me.
-
I've always wondered about this, and I've tried to test it but my
results seem conflicting. When I have it set on A (auto exposure),
the camera determines an exposure as I press the shutter based on
the amount of light coming through the lens. Is this a one-time-
only reading, or will the exposure change if lighting conditions
change? Lets say, for example, that I turn off all the lights in
room and fire the shutter. It doesn't detect a lot of light in the
room so it wants to do a really long exposure. But if I turn the
lights back on halfway through, will it continue to expose as though
the room were still dark (leading to overexposure), or will it
adjust the exposure to account for the brighter room?
Speaking of long exposures in the dark, I do this a lot, and I
usually stop down the lens to 8 or so and just use the auto function
(the first six or so photos in my portfolio were taken this way).
But, I've heard people say that this results in inaccurate
exposures. I've never had a problem with it, but my best results
come when I adjust it to +2. So sometimes the exposures last what
seems like several minutes, though I've never timed them with a
stopwatch. I guess my question is, is there an upper limit to how
long the shutter will stay open when used in this manner, and do
other people find this method to be inaccurate?
Another thing, in the camera manual it says that a small amount of
battery power is used even when the B setting is used. Why is
this? I thought it was completely mechanical at manual settings.
Thanks for any responses!
-
same here with the FE, they always came out very nice. I recently tried it with the FM3A and the results were equally good. Exposures were a couple minutes long. never tried an f3 or f5 though....
-
yeah, that would be nice.
-
Hi, I was wondering if anyone had advice on photographing
seashells. I have access to a large collection, and some of them
are very small and shiny. I would like to get some close ups and
abstract the patterns on the surface of the shells, but some have
interesting shapes I would like to photograph the entire object. So
if anyone can point me to any examples of seashells being
photographed in an artistic manner (most of the pictures I've found
so far are very scientific in nature) I would very much appreciate
it. Any advice on lighting (I've tried before but can't seem to get
rid of specular reflections) and backgrounds would also be useful,
or anything else I haven't thought about. FYI I'm using a Nikon
FM3A and 55mm f/3.5 AI macro lens. I don't have bellows or
extension tubes but am considering purchasing one.
Thanks,
-john
-
Does anyone know where to get either of these films? I know they are
out of production. Also, can the polaroid auto processor be used for
any other films, or did I waste 5 dollars?
-
War Eagle Rick!
-
wow...thanks for all the responses. There are more of us out there than I expected.
-
I'm just curious. Not really sure why I do it...maybe because it's
more of a challenge.
-
I have been using an Industar 55/2.8 for a while with good results.
-
-
Salvatore-
I generally agree with you, (see my previous post) but I think normalizing ratings might lead to some confusion.
-
I think photo.net should report not only the average of your
ratings, but also the median (the number in the middle) and the mode
(the most commonly occurring number). These would be less sensitive
to aberrant rating and provide a better measure of what most people
think about a picture. -john counts
-
I have only recently begun to rate & upload photos. It is already apparent that the people who I give low ratings to have a much higher tendency to come back and give me low ratings. This makes me only want to rate the best photos. I don't have a point - just making an observation.
-john counts
-
8.5 minutes at 20.5 degrees C in D-76 undiluted worked great. Thanks for the help. -john
-
Thanks for the suggestions...I'll try something tonite and let you know how it comes out. -john
-
Hi. I have a 35mm roll of Kodak HIE infrared that needs
developing. My problem is that I don't know how long to develop it
for. I can't just follow the recommended times on the package
because it was shot rated at ASA 200, metered through the lens, a
red 25 filter and a polarizer, and this is not how I was supposed to
rate it. Can anyone recommend a developing time/temp, preferably
using D-76? I would like to salvage these pictures if possible.
Most were outdoors, usually in bright sunlight, if that means
anything. Thanks for any help, -john.
help! I dropped my lens in a creek.
in Nikon
Posted