5711

<p>missing a few green ones to get one but sooner or later it will happen. <br> seriously want to test one..havent been this excited about a camera in years :)</p>

<p><img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/17979471-md.jpg" alt="" width="680" height="453" /></p> <p>d3x. 55mm macro. sheet of paper as reflector and pk13</p>

<p><img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/18202113-md.jpg" alt="" width="680" height="452" /><br> d3 + 85mm @ 1.8</p> <p>hello guys :)</p>

<p>i just wanted to say bye to some of you who seem to be actual really cool human beings.<br /> however that might be, i am trying to figure out how to delte my account.<br /> i just cannot take the nonsense beeing posted here...some of it is just beyond belief and i simply do not need that much bs in my life.<br /> i have been on this site since around 2003 and i can remember that i got frustrated by what people talk about and how they see photography.<br /> at this point of my life it is one of the most important things in my life and i am not a good teacher..i just do not have the will or the nerves.</p> <p>to those of you, you know who you are, keep it up!<br /> you rule</p> <p>and shun, damnit....go to a real concert :D</p> <p>bye</p> <p>damn this doesnt work as i want it to...</p>

<p>pick up a camera like a d4s or a 1dx and test what you are talking about. <br> lv af lacks behind by 10000 lightyears,...at least.<br> you posted alot of misleading things that are not true.<br> learn to understand autofocus.<br> please...do yourself a favour and read posts regarding autofocus on the link i posted.<br> for once</p> <p>od damn</p>

<p>viewfinder af is called phase detection.<br> live view works by focusing over contrast.<br> read up on this.</p> <p>f8 with view finder af in low light...thats just wrong.</p> <p>to get you started, id recomment you read this blog:<br> http://www.wildlifeinpixels.net/blog/</p> <p> </p>

<p>viewfinder af is called phase detection.<br> live view works by focusing over contrast.<br> read up on this.</p> <p>f8 with view finder af in low light...thats just wrong.</p> <p>to get you started, id recomment you read this blog:<br> http://www.wildlifeinpixels.net/blog/</p> <p> </p>

<p>i had the same issue with my d3 and d3x. i noticed that they expose differently.<br> if you check the exifs you will see that iso 100 actually reads iso 105 or something.<br> the number is slightly different. the nikon support confirmed that different cameras work different in this terms and this is how it is supposed to be.<br> till then i have my d3 on -0.3ev consantly. always</p> <p>in addition to that you are comparing an 8 year old sensor to a new one.<br> one that is totally different.</p> <p>its supposed to be like that, i know in comparism it looks weird, but that can be fixed in post</p>

<p>no, my world of photography is not everyone elses<br> but i do not complain.</p> <p>i am also a graffiti artist and i carry 50 kilograms on my back just for fun...<br> my photobackpack weights about 10-15 kilos..depending on what i am going to do.<br> i bring equipment to places if i want that shot.</p> <p>so do all my friends who make a living with fine art b&w film photography<br> no one bitches about weight</p> <p>no one</p> <p>only on forums.</p> <p>the flicker in your eyes caused by exhaustion...<br> just to get away with a photo that did not exist when you started into your day should be the goal<br> this and nothing else</p> <p>i am sure the canon forums are full of complaints about the new 24-70 and how ridiculous the arrest switch for the<br> zoom that only works at 24 mm, is...<br> the filter size<br> the prize</p> <p>i got it on my 1dx.<br> i hated it when i first got it.<br> produces awesome photos</p> <p>case closed</p> <p>all the wishlists of whatever might have been awesome about something and where it should be<br> miss just one point</p> <p>seriously<br> what was the first camera you took a shot with you were proud of</p> <p>i am sure there was a lot of complaing going on back then..now was it.</p> <p>make the best of what you get<br> quit your bitching, go take photos</p> <p>..<br> or hunt for rainbows and ponies.</p> <p>i am srsly disgusted by what i read here..<br> its a disgrace to photography</p> <p>i help alot on these forums<br> like the dude that asked about the greyed out menu of the inteval shooting mode.<br> you didnt know it..the postings where shit<br> and here are all the experts and knowit alls.<br> dafuq</p> <p>it makes me wanna puke.</p> <p> </p>

<p>let me rephrase that</p> <p>can you afford an assistant?</p>

<p>i had my workout today<br /> shot 3 hours ago</p> <p>nikon d3, iso 6400, -0.7ev, sb 910 @ -3ev + 24-70 @24mm and f2.8<br /> the band is called bloodshed remains, hardcore punk band from austria<br /> <img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/18064796-md.jpg" alt="" width="680" height="452" /></p> <p>if i can use this setup in the moshpit and at alot more dangerous places you can use it too.<br /> quit your bitchin about a weight increase that is a nonissue.</p>

<p>the thing i hate about photography the most and it seems not to change is that everyone knows everything but no one does.</p> <p>talk is cheap</p>

<p>photo.net wont allow me to post my response.<br> so much bs in this thread..</p> <p>why did i read it..<br> laters girls.<br> go buy a pony</p>

<p>i went to a concert again.<br /> this is madball's singer, freddy cricien.<br> madball is a new york based hardcore punk band formed in the late 1980s<br> <br /> shot for an online mag</p> <p>d3, f2.8, iso 6400, 1/250th, 24-70 2.8 @24<br /> added a bit of contrast and thats that.</p> <p><img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/18064560-md.jpg" alt="" width="680" height="452" /></p>

<p>i know its a weird concept. <br> to cope with weight i go work out.<br> try it</p> <p> </p>

<p>i want to add something to this discussion</p> <p>i want a 14-600 for 2000 euros with vr. f1.4 all the way and it should not be too heavy.<br /> lets be realistic and say...2 kilos sounds about right.<br /> i can then attach it to my sony camera<br /> yes, in my spare time i collect unicorns and ferraris </p> <p>then i woke up<br /> get over it girls</p>

<p>summer...hmm..i am not too fond of the temperature as i am quite heat sensitive.<br> this guy is not</p> <p><img src="https://scontent-vie1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpt1/t31.0-8/11707847_418454775020355_6150689773677103293_o.jpg" alt="" width="1600" height="1065" /></p> <p>nikon d3, 24-70<br> linked from my facebook page</p> <p>enjoy the heat</p>

<p>there is a lot of different possibilites to why interval shooting wont work.<br /> most likley it is because your time settings in the camera are way off.<br /> this happens if the internal memory gets f-ed up, no power for too long is a classic.<br /> sometimes it then shows some weird date, like 2004, 2007, 2010, something.<br /> in that case:</p> <p>go to the wrench thingy<br /> select time zone<br /> set time and zone correctly</p> <p>should work now.<br /> <br /> if it doesnt, reset the camera shooting menu, reset time zone.<br />reconfigure time zone<br /> reconfigure camera settings</p> <p>should work now</p> <p>if it doesn't, use it as a door nob :)<br /> or maybe check the battery first, might be too low on power<br /> if the error reoccurs in a short period of time, get a new battery for the internal memory.<br /> with big cameras like the d3 or d4 this battery is located inside the battery slot.<br /> should be similar with your model, i dont know for sure though.</p> <p>hope this helped</p>

<p>"what are you photographing"<br> "the concert"<br> "we would need a photo for our weddinginvitations, how about we go to the toilet and take a shot"<br> "alright, i insist on getting one of those"<br> "how much do you charge"<br> "a beer and a scotch"</p> <p>done and done.<br> they did actually use it</p> <p>nikon d3, 16-35<br> <img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/18057839-md.jpg" alt="" width="680" height="452" /></p>

<p>had a similar problem at a job once where i was assiting to the photographer.<br> turned out to be the red plastic that was just scratched in a way that the su4 mode<br> would only work in a certain position.<br> but that one was badly scratched.</p> <p>so i am guessing you maybe want to have this checked out and replaced.<br> worked for my collegue</p>

<p>there you go..seventy years old and not complaining about weight.<br> the next time someone complains about the higher weight of the bigger bodies i am going to <br> qoute you :)</p> <p> </p>

<p>600mm<br /> when i was 19 i got this owl photography workshop as a present, ever since i want one.<br /> dreams remain dreams, but it is good to have some.</p> <p>until then i watch them from afar whenever i get the chance. people in vienna are really unaware to their presence<br /> and sometimes i hear people guessing that the bird that just passed by in this ridicilous smooth sail must be some<br /> sort of huge pidgeon :)))</p>

<p>a d3 used in good shape should be about as much as a new d610.<br /> there is a lot of ppl out there wanting you to pay 2k euros for a d3 witth 170k shutter count...do not buy.</p> <p>unless there is no explicit reason why you would need a d3, i would suggest the d610.</p> <p>regarding this dynamic range.<br /><br /> i recently got invited to test a phaseone.<br /> i ofc chose the xf and a<br />how come dxo d7200 has a bigger dynamic range as a phase one sensor.<br> seriously...somone hack and take down this dxo mark site..it is a pain in the ass</p>

<p>it is not a matter of if it is just a matter of when i will be able to afford one.<br> and if i do..boy...i am so gonna buy one :D<br> until then..yeah..well..i wait </p>