![](http://content.invisioncic.com/l323473/set_resources_2/84c1e40ea0e759e3f1505eb1788ddf3c_pattern.png)
thomas_turk
-
Posts
1,199 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Image Comments posted by thomas_turk
-
-
I would..move to the right so that the tree tops are in the V of the mountains, for more balance.. tilt the camera down so that the right mountain top touches the top of the pix, for more foreground and more earthy feel... and wait till the sun comes out for more shadows, contrasts and drama..a little sleepy right now, and not misty enough for another mood.
-
Congratulations for using film for nature. Gets the digi-heads confused, they think it must gave been 'shopped. Capture, exposure, composition, perspective all superior.
-
Now, if the excellent foreground framing were a little out of focus, and the hilly island? lit up by the sun, ....
-
Superb, dynamic, contrasty mountain. Excellent exposure. Polarizer would have given a deeper blue sky for more drama. The tree seems to balance the mountain but at the same time detracts a little. I wonder how the compostion would have looked with tree out of focus, (f2.8?), to accentuate the subject mountain. Would be interesting to see one more shot for comparison, with the camera tilted down so that the top of the mountain touched the sky, much more shadow, for a more earthy feeling.
-
-
-
Excellent composition and black background. Digital lost the fine textures and natural colors that would have given 'life' to nature . F2.8 would have just given the main flower and immediate leaf focus, and thrown the rest of the pix much more out of focus, for added dimension. Bright side sun lighting would have added shadow for depth, and rear lighting would have been stunning. If it is sunlit, the digits didnt give us the contrasts.
-
Superb film colors. Fabulous lighting and exposure. Perspective and camera position excellent. I would just crop off the end different-colored/lit wall on the right of the pix, to make the composition much more strict and clear.
-
Composition strict and clear BUT..rear flowers detract from the subject, and should be out of focus... just a yellow white blur. If you dont have f2, they can be pushed or bent back. Background contrast excellent. Lighting could have been back, for a stunning result, or side, for more shadow for depth and dimension.
-
Intersting composition. If I blank (crop) off all the sky above the 2 black window 'diamonds', losing the uninteresting blue sky, it becomes more strict and clear.
-
Drab dead featureless digital clouds and dull green digital grass do not a nature shot make. Apart from that, the composition is neither strict nor clear. No direct, or behind sun, on the overcropped subject plant to bring it into prominence. Backlit would have been stunning, and that is where digital can get away with it. see photos4u.dk for ideas from a king of light and composition.
-
Well captured. Good exposure. Backgound very noisy, would have been stunning if right out of focus, f2.8?. To give more dynanmics to the pix, the wild ducky should be at the extreme right of the pix, and have a little space on the left to fly across, OR a slight panning to show a blurred background, ..OR a slower shutter speed, that would have resulted in blur of the flapping wings, all indicating movement...now our ducky is just frozen in space.
-
For bird shots you need a good tele with f2.8 at least. The compostion here is neither strict nor clear. What you saw, you didnt capture. That is the challenge of photography.
-
Lower features in the composition are interesting, stray petal top right detracts. Colors artificial digital. Nature's vibrancy calls out for film. Side lighting would have given shadow detail for contrast and dimension. Back lighting would have made it stuunning.
-
-
-
Natural unposed shot. Good background contrast/choice. Too much blank space on the left of the pix. Cropping off half of that, makes the composition more strict and clear. Sorely needs some side-sunlight to light up the faces to give depth, dimension and drama. See photos4u.dk, master of light and composí´©on.
-
The in-focus, excellent-framing, close, upper branch detracts from the said parrot. Maybe one more shot with that branch as out-of-focus as the background would have made for a much clearer and stricter composition. The lighting and exposure, the perspective and camera position are all excellent. Ndege maridadi!
-
Dunno, salvador, guess I may need to be in an altered state to figure this one out, like when reading the mayan calender.
-
Any larger and I'll be blinded, but... the exposure is excellent, sun is tele-bold, composition with much sky is ethereal, and final result is dramatic. lens flare is acceptable.
-
Underexposed hippo thinks..how do I get them tights off the too tightly cropped lady?
-
Superb exposure. Strict, clear composition. Wonderful camera position and perspective. Very dramatic shot.
-
Strict clear composition. Dynamic angles on the clouds match the dynamics of the worker. Beautiful cirrus clouds, (ice crystals at 30,000 feet, normally heralding an incoming weather front). Camera position excellent. Great exposure.
-
The Wedding Day
in Wedding
Posted