Jump to content

brambor

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    3,444

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Posts posted by brambor

    Best method for photographing ice hockey

    in Canon EOS Mount

    Posted

    Glen,

     

    Monopod = good, 2.8@250 or 320 set to manual, shoot raw and fix your wb then if necessary, you can also recover 2 stops from corners or situations where your manual setting underexposes. Separating focus from shutter = good. AI servo = good, continuous = good.

     

    Every rink is different. After a few shoots at a certain rink you will be able to adjust your manual settings.

     

    200mm lens = good

    {W/NW}: New stuff 10

    in Leica and Rangefinders

    Posted

    <p>

    I shot one more batch of this old Pontiac:

    <p>

    <a href=" title="Photo Sharing"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/82/250066305_843b5c8c8b_m.jpg" width="240" height="160" alt="Old Car" /></a>

    <a href=" title="Photo Sharing"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/80/250066280_34320dfbea_m.jpg" width="240" height="160" alt="Old Car" /></a>

    <a href=" title="Photo Sharing"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/93/250066263_c6fa2c3946_m.jpg" width="240" height="160" alt="Old Car" /></a>

    <a href=" title="Photo Sharing"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/88/250066172_107d2cffe2_m.jpg" width="240" height="160" alt="Old Car" /></a>

    <a href=" title="Photo Sharing"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/87/250066155_28415b6153_m.jpg" width="240" height="160" alt="Old Car" /></a>

    <a href=" title="Photo Sharing"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/94/250066780_7a242b6fdc_m.jpg" width="240" height="160" alt="Old Car" /></a>

    How frequently do you photograph?

    in Leica and Rangefinders

    Posted

    On average twice per week. I don't shoot a lot of frames though. Usually about 10 frames per shooting. I'm low volume shooter unless I'm on 'assignment'. I'm still using 512mb cards and that is enough. 2 rolls per month are a norm for me.

    <p>

    When I go on a dedicated shooting then I shoot a lot(for my style), easily about 100 frames per shooting.

    {W/NW}: New stuff 9

    in Leica and Rangefinders

    Posted

    <a href=" src="http://static.flickr.com/59/242507741_e76879f5be_m.jpg" width="160" height="240" alt="smw32" /></a>

     

    <a href=" src="http://static.flickr.com/62/242507444_6fd9db5c51_m.jpg" width="240" height="160" alt="smw25" /></a>

     

    <a href=" src="http://static.flickr.com/98/241503826_b74e42b6c8_m.jpg" width="161" height="240" alt="~" /></a>

     

    <a href=" src="http://static.flickr.com/83/242507219_b686c57ae2_m.jpg" width="240" height="160" alt="smw19" /></a>

     

    <a href=" src="http://static.flickr.com/81/242507204_3a0776ad00_m.jpg" width="240" height="160" alt="smw18" /></a>

     

    <a href=" src="http://static.flickr.com/91/241026588_82634c453f_m.jpg" width="160" height="240" alt="~" /></a>

     

    <a href=" src="http://static.flickr.com/94/242507523_792fb1ce70_m.jpg" width="160" height="240" alt="smw27" /></a>

     

    <a href=" src="http://static.flickr.com/85/242508063_80a237ce47_m.jpg" width="240" height="160" alt="smw7" /></a>

    <a href=" title="Photo Sharing"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/94/242507598_6a026d4687_m.jpg" width="240" height="160" alt="smw3" /></a>

     

    <a href=" src="http://static.flickr.com/91/242002410_3e9f0ec2e5_m.jpg" width="240" height="160" alt="smImage502" /></a>

     

    <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/79726136@N00/242002517/"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/95/242002517_32761726e5_m.jpg" width="240" height="160" alt="smImage601" /></a>

     

    <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/79726136@N00/242507967/"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/87/242507967_d69c50707c_m.jpg" width="240" height="160" alt="smw42" /></a>

    {W/NW}: New stuff 9

    in Leica and Rangefinders

    Posted

    <a href=" title="Photo Sharing"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/97/244195813_8d4d663176_o.jpg" width="800" height="533" alt="Old Car" /></a>

    <p>

    <a href=" title="Photo Sharing"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/84/244195762_34bb851878_o.jpg" width="800" height="533" alt="Old Car" /></a>

    <p>

    <a href=" title="Photo Sharing"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/82/244195636_ae6d59e621_o.jpg" width="800" height="533" alt="Old Car" /></a>

    <p>

    <a href=" title="Photo Sharing"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/88/244195687_8059ec6b7d_m.jpg" width="240" height="160" alt="Old Car" /></a>

     

    <a href=" title="Photo Sharing"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/96/244195798_00e6d0ab0f_m.jpg" width="240" height="160" alt="Old Car" /></a>

    Erwin's M8 Review

    in Leica and Rangefinders

    Posted

    I don't put much on Erwin's conclusions but...

     

    If Erwin's conclusion was that the image is superior to the Canon then I would have thought that testing a prime lens vs a Canon zoom isn't fair but...

     

    Getting spanked by Canon zoom isn't groovy either.

     

    P.S. I still believe that the M8 is a great camera capable of great images in the right hands.

    Nicer to see a response than an automated deletion

    in PhotoNet Site Help

    Posted

    <i>

    If a thread is not thought worth saving or covers ground that has been gone over time and time again in past threads, it will be deleted.</i>

    <p>

    If a thread covers a topic that has been covered before I would say that a NEWER thread should be considered for keeps and the older thread to be deleted. It would at least make the readers who google the thread think that the site is active with current information.

    <p>

    Also if I wanted to contact some of the members who answered the question it is far more likely that the members in the NEWER thread are still active for response as opposed to contacting someone from a 3 year old thread who might not be available anymore.

    Street Photography

    in Leica and Rangefinders

    Posted

    hmm. not bad. I expected worse from reading previous post on S&D. I liked what he had to say. Too bad that the music and the editing with quick changes added a hectic overtone to what he was saying. There was the excitement of the street with talking about how to blend in (in supposedly non-hectic way). We Americans like to talk in superlatives so being invisible doesn't really match what he was actually doing but in a way it was a good way to more around and shoot. I liked a few of the shots, especially the one of the couple and the two cars just meeting in front of them. The whole whing was frozen by the movie camera but I would have looked like a super shot.
×
×
  • Create New...