glenroy

November 14, 2003

Nice work and good symmetry. Pity there wasn't a 6th flower lower to the right to finish the row.

November 14, 2003

It is a little too bland for me, without any eye contact.

November 14, 2003

Lovely shot. Well thought out.

November 14, 2003

May be a stop overexposed, but cute all the same.

November 4, 2003

I guess that the diffuser filter may detract from the overall sharpness, and perhaps the eyes need the sharpness.

Thanks.

October 14, 2003

Thanks for your input guys.

I generally don't worry too much about what others think in the regard of popular or unpopular.

I am however, trying to look at 'other' angles of the nude so that it is a little tantalizing, but not your usual.

October 14, 2003

Funny how one letter makes all the difference. It should say KINDLY modeling for me.

October 7, 2003

Sorry, but it may be ART, but not to me.

October 7, 2003

Original at least. It just needs a little more sharpness for me.

September 25, 2003

Thanks Joe, I'll aim to enter more soon.

September 24, 2003

Although the wire is interesting, I find it a bit of a distraction. The blossom by themself are a good point.

September 17, 2003

It depends upon the effect you are trying to achieve, buy I would have used a polariser to reduce the glare from the water. otherwise, nice.

September 11, 2003

Well done..... That does it for me.

September 9, 2003

Pity about the lower section being cut off. It may have been good.

September 9, 2003

The darkness of the shaddow areas detract slightly from the overall shot.

September 9, 2003

I'm amazed how differently people look at this photo. The differences in the ratings makes me very aware that shots like this appeal to some and definatley not to others. That to me is a good learning experience.

Thanks

Glen

September 9, 2003

To me, it feels messy and there is not too much of a flow throught the picture. The top half is overexposed, and I feel that the ceiling is too obtrusive.

Thanks.