carl_crosby3
-
Posts
252 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Image Comments posted by carl_crosby3
-
-
I don't like cats, as a rule, but this one... Well done.
-
I love the humor! Did you do that on purpse, or was it a "grab" shot? The photo is also technically excellent.
-
Unsharp, and the face is too shaded, hiding what might be an interesting person. The eyes need to be visible and in focus, or the impact and character are lost. If the gentleman is still available, try again, using softer light.
-
Cropping the left side of the picture severely would improve the image by eliminating non-essential and distracting elements. A little more exposure for the subject would also help.
-
The composition and exposure are o.k., but the photo is somewhat static. There is no single point of interest.
-
OOOH shades of my diddyboppin' days! The '49 with bullnose, frenched headlights, and the '51 grille shell. What's that , a 2 inch top chop? You did good! I still want one! No doubt with a Caddy OHV 8 for motive power. Oh, drool, suffer, whine!
-
Helesti: Good effort, and it would be improved if the animal were whole. Rule #2: Check the feet. If you don't, 77% of the time, they will be cut off. (Don't ask me how I know this!) A smidge more exposure would separate the leopard from the background.
-
Attention-getting photo!I hope you are recovering well. Will you be released to go home soon? Probably from the back seat of another car, right?
-
Cropping both sides will improve the photo, IMHO. Good effort.
-
A little more exposure to lighten the shadows would be nice, but an interesting image.
-
-
Nice Candid, and the exposure is good.
-
I bet she really likes this photo. Is anyone actually named Sally Ann nowadays? Pleasant, attractive subject, good exposure.
-
A great candid of attractive people interacting.
-
The eyes are sharp, and it looks as if it might be an interesting, maybe a great photo, if you could see what was behind those eyes. Photo=light, Graphos=writing Sooo, we write with Light! If there is no light there is no image. LIGHT, LIGHT, LIGHT! It's cheap, use more. Max. f/stop, 11-22 for depth of field, camera parallel to subject, and jusiciously used flash/daylight/reflector.Stop all motion. Now, go take some more pictures.
-
Good journalistic effort. It raises the question: What does that dude think he is going do, against the Gendarmerie? Is this the last great act of defiance? I bet the next few moments were very interesting.
-
Is it my monitor, or is the photo printed so dark there is no detail? But for that slight error, it might be a really interesting picture. Too bad we'll never know. Light is all we have to work with. It is cheap, use enough.
-
John: Why didn't you pick a dominant color, like YELLOW? Great use of color, a wallhanger for sure.
-
-
The pose seem s a bit awkward, it doesn't flow, or complement the form of the subject. Sort of reminiscent of Han Solo being trapped in the block of carbonite. (Star Wars)
-
-
A powerful image. Now go take some more pictures.
-
Nice backlighting effect.
-
Nice cumulus "street", but underexposed by about a stop.
Fall in my backyard
in Nature
Posted