smhickel

January 28, 2002

Your most powerful. B&W would be good, but this is a strong composition.

January 28, 2002

I agree with the Sky comment, but composition is impeccable.

January 28, 2002

I like this one. I believe it is one of your best. Keep up the good work.

January 27, 2002

I would like more sharpness detail in the skin.

January 27, 2002

Interesting.

January 27, 2002

I like the image of girl in glass, the dog's tail motion. I don't like the spot behind girl's head and brightness of auto.

January 27, 2002

Too blue, but nice lighting affect.

January 27, 2002

Nice shot.

January 27, 2002

antennas (being a ham radio guy).

Good composition.

January 27, 2002

Especially if they were stand in the splash of light a bit closer in.

January 27, 2002

Person peering over being closer would have improved it. I like it.

January 27, 2002

The only thing different I would have done would have waited for one person walking up (if it was possible, until they were about 1/3 way up. Preferably a women (attractive) or old with colorfull garb.

January 27, 2002

This is a fantastic photo. You definetly need to get the latest generation scanner and unfortunatly a computer that has the memory and processor to handle it. I would bet you that this photo would get 8+ if it were done on a Nikon or other high end scanner. Food for thought.

January 27, 2002

Scan it once where it is cut off at the knees on the columns. Very effective. Scan in slightly smaller so no scrolling is necessary.

Steve

January 27, 2002

What's the deal with the satellite dish?

January 27, 2002

I think the 4000ED would fix this up quite nicely. Lots of tolerance for a "troubled" neg.

January 27, 2002

I really like this photo. I note the zone system is needing some repair here though. I think it is a scanner issue or software. No Blackest black or whitest white, or something missing in that score. See if you can rescan it with a 4000ED from Nikon.