jim_c

February 25, 2003

I really like this shot. Frankly I like the aesthetics so much it rather blinds me to any possible flaws.

February 13, 2003

Very nice, good exposure and composition. Her expression works fine for me. But I'd like to see same setup with a smile as well as this one, I guess I could go either way.

October 31, 2002

Ya know jay, you've got a good point. It's been awhile since I've looked at this photo. I think I'd do well to rethink a number of things, especially cropping. I'll see if I can get around to seeing what I can do. Thanks for your comments.

October 31, 2002

Yeah, I forgot to edit the sutter time, it was 1/15 sec I rated the film at 40. Considering that I thought I was wasting my time with "landscape" film, lol. I'm really happy how things turned out.

I'll play around with your cropping recommendations, thanks.

October 31, 2002

Very well done, outstanding, I really like this.

October 31, 2002

Comment's welcome much much more than ratings please.

October 31, 2002

Developed and printed by Images photo in AZ. This scan is from a fuji frontier. While I like this photo, I liked the print more. The scan isn't as robust, especially with the flesh tones as the original print. Not sure how I feel about her body in the background,hmmm. I.m not after ratings, comments please

August 18, 2002

Very nice, everything works very will.

August 14, 2002

Wow, so sharp and so nice.

July 30, 2002

Michelle's comments pretty much sum's up my own thoughts.

July 18, 2002

Jay I'd love to know what developer was used for this. Great photo, btw.

July 13, 2002

Very nice, did you really shoot it with Ilford 3200? Their is nothing I can say wrong about this photo, nor car I think of ways to improve it. Lightings great, expression's great, and you've got wonderfull catchlights in his eyes. Well done sir!

June 17, 2002

Very nice, I like this, coloration is great.

June 15, 2002

Very nice jim, inocent.

June 7, 2002

But it doesn't look infa red at all. Tech details you list Kodak Kodak Professional T400CN. What film is it? The tonality just doesn't look like IR.

June 3, 2002

One of the only animal portraits I've ever seen where the EYE's totally make the photo. Nice work!

I would like her nose to be in the shot, but it's still nice.

May 27, 2002

Truely spectacular!

May 26, 2002

A lovely capture, very thought provoking. In nitpicking, I'd like the hair to be crisper.

May 12, 2002

I love this photo! I am torn about the branch, part of me says, it's tells a story about the location of this photo. Another part of me says it is a major distraction. Top notch comp and lighting. I am impressed with what you have created. And I love her expression, very thought provoking.

May 5, 2002

Nice photograph, I like her expression and the lighting look good. The picture is on the small side so I'll pass judgement on catchlight's in the eyes. Using a lower f-stop would make the wrinkles far less noticeable. Tech details says f2.8, but theirs no way you shot that photo at that f-stop. Looks for like f16+. Thanks for shairing.

May 1, 2002

To me what's amiss with the eye's is simply where the catchlight's are reflecting, on the pupil's. Other wise her eye's are very well exposed. I do feel if she was asked to relax her smile a little bit, it would improve this photo.