markvmueller 0 Posted June 8, 2010 That is a lovely shot with strong but subdud colours, the wirl is not to strong to take over the image. Very well done indeed. Cheers, Mark. Link to comment
fernandosalas1 0 Posted June 8, 2010 Perfect shot, lovely tones, I just added to my favorites. 6/6. Regards. Link to comment
afernandez 0 Posted June 8, 2010 Oh my god, is really an awesome image !! Technic and composition are perfect.One of my favorites photos, no doubt.Great job. Regards from Spain. Link to comment
alfbailey 4 Posted June 8, 2010 Reall well balanced and composed image with great foreground detail and subtle colour in the sky and horizon.Excellent!Kind RegardsAlf Link to comment
brendan_trewartha 0 Posted June 9, 2010 Amazing photo Kah Kit, did you take any sunset shots in the same place? Link to comment
s_lung_chen 0 Posted June 9, 2010 Damn..Straightt....I like your photography, Kah Kit Yoong. Can i know what your nationality is ? Just asking but it's ok if u don't wanna answer it :D Link to comment
wedeko 0 Posted June 9, 2010 Great shot with magical colors.Really like the curl in the waterhole! Link to comment
Timo Hartikainen 556 Posted June 9, 2010 It's beautiful. I would like it more without that starfish at the bottom left corner...but that's only my opinion. Link to comment
patflynn 0 Posted June 10, 2010 Composition is solid and exposure seems optimal. It appears the Hoya CP caused vignetting? It's fine elsewhere but detracts from the bottom left. Some contrast boost in the dawn sky would also punch this up pleasingly. Nice effort, the subject does stand out for uniqueness. Link to comment
eduardocarrasco 0 Posted June 10, 2010 wonderful shoot, very good compotition and well done, congratulations Link to comment
jose orozco 0 Posted June 10, 2010 Genial composicion y magnifica atmosfera,enhorabuena es un regalo para los sentidos. Link to comment
johnrobinson 0 Posted June 13, 2010 Brilliant scattering of starfish Kah, love the movement in the water too. I have never seen such a wonderful display of these things before, awsome stuff! Link to comment
javier_camacho_gimeno 0 Posted July 21, 2010 Very beautifull shoot, the compositio is 10/10 Link to comment
pmj 6 Posted July 26, 2010 Please note the following: This image has been selected for discussion. It is not necessarily the "best" picture the Elves have seen this week, nor is it a contest. Discussion of photo.net policy, including the choice of Photograph of the Week should not take place here, but in the Help & Questions Forum. The About Photograph of the Week page tells you more about this feature of photo.net. Before writing a contribution to this thread, please consider our reason for having this forum: to help people learn about photography. Visitors have browsed the gallery, found a few striking images and want to know things like why is it a good picture, why does it work? Or, indeed, why doesn't it work, or how could it be improved? Try to answer such questions with your contribution. Link to comment
john_a5 0 Posted July 26, 2010 Honestly, I am not that excited about this photograph. I guess I am a bit tired of the near-far compositions, seascapes and long exposures with water--3 strikes! I really don't find the composition all that strong and actually, very pedantic. The ghostly swirl is likely the reason this image was selected here and possibly by the photographer as well. My problem with it is that I don't find it very attractive or mysterious, just a phenomenon--it makes me wonder if there could have been a more interesting version to be had with other exposure times. As it is, my first impression was that it might have been added in post by someone who wasn't very good at post work. Interesting phenomenon to me are only interesting when they are interesting, and this isn't IMO. If this swirl is supposed to be the focus, I think the image would've been much stronger without the top half of the image--maybe even if it isn't the focus. Here, we are first given a pretty predictable seascape and then discover this messy swirl. At least without the monoliths out in the sea, the image would have been a bit more focused on the subject and avoided the trite to some extent. It might have even made that phenomenon more interesting? Anyway, I really don't have any opinion about this……… Link to comment
Landrum Kelly 65 Posted July 27, 2010 As it is, my first impression was that it might have been added in post by someone who wasn't very good at post work.John, I wonder if the swirl was perchance a surprise that resulted from the delayed exposure. I am not sure that it was not shopped in, but it might have a natural cause, given the long exposure.I have no doubt that it is a pretty picture. It simply smacks me as a bit over-saturated. I could be wrong.You and I are certainly on the same page about time exposures of moving water, but some people love that effect. As for seascapes, the best views of seas are from sea kayaks and surf boards (or at least paddle boards), in my opinion, but who wants to let go of the paddle when the seas are running? As for boards, well. . . .So, shots of craggy shorelines are what we are typically left with--some of them the most dramatic shots in photography. This one strives not for drama, but for another kind of mystery, in my opinion.I rather like the crags in the distance, even though they might be in competition with the foreground for the viewer's attention.I see in the swirl and the starfish a creature emerging from the primordial slime, with hands that resemble starfish. This is one to dream by, but I can't get in the mood for a nightmare. On some level, I think that it succeeds. Unfortunately, I am not on that level.--Lannie Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now