peter_kim2 Posted December 21, 2003 Share Posted December 21, 2003 Ive been deveoping some Tri-x and the negatives look a little dark. However I have shot the film with a couple different cameras (Canon A-1 and Contax T3) so I dont think its a over-exposure problem but a developing one. My quetion is, what happens to the negative when one under develops and conversly, over develops? Do I get dark negatives when I overdevelop (ie develop the film for longer than one should?) Im shooting Tri-x at 400 with Xtol 1:1 68 degrees for about 8-9 minutes. agitate for the first 30 seconds then 5 seconds every 30 seconds after that (using a paterson tank, 2 full inversions). Thank You... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
._._z Posted December 21, 2003 Share Posted December 21, 2003 <i> what happens to the negative when one under develops and conversly, over develops? Do I get dark negatives when I overdevelop (ie develop the film for longer than one should? </i><p> http://www.libarts.ucok.edu/journalism/BasicProcess.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
al_kaplan1 Posted December 21, 2003 Share Posted December 21, 2003 The longer the development the darker the negative is the general rule. 1/2 minute can make a noticeable difference. "About 8-9 minutes" is sloppy! You should develop for EXACTLY whatever time gives you the proper results. Consistancy is important. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter_kim2 Posted December 21, 2003 Author Share Posted December 21, 2003 Al, actually I develop for exactly 8.75 minutes...I guess I should have been more exact when I said that. Hmm...so overdevelopment leads to darker (overexposed?) negatives and I assume slightly higher grain? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
d_poinsett Posted December 22, 2003 Share Posted December 22, 2003 In general, longer development not only makes the overall density greater but also increases the contrast and makes the grain larger as you mentioned. The same effects are produced by higher developing temperatures, higher developer concentration, and increased agitation. The converse is true for all of these things as well. There are a variety of ways to determine contrast of the negative. Search photo.net and the web for further details. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_waller Posted December 22, 2003 Share Posted December 22, 2003 Over-development wil give dense highlights but little if any extra density in the shadows, hence high contrast. Under-development gives low contrast. A good neg should print to give a full range of tones at grade 2-2.5. If your negs need a grade 1-1.5 to print a full range of tones then reduce film development time by about 15 percent. The difference between 8 and 9 minutes is about 12.5 percent and equivalent to almost a full grade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott_walton2 Posted December 26, 2003 Share Posted December 26, 2003 First off Peter, you might want to use 1 camera for testing... even your lens might very well have differences from 1 focal length to another. This being said, it has been stated that with an overdeveloped negative, your highlights and some upper mid tones are going to be denser than desired. If it is a sunny day, I tend to pull the negatives by 10-15% (all depending how bright the sun/shadows are) and a cloudy day I push (overdevelop) by up to 10% to add some sparkle to an otherwise dull scene. This was derived by me doing my own testing with a densitometer and testing each emulsion I use.When you develop your negative, the first thing that develops fully are your shadows (thinnest part of the negative) and as you keep developing, you develop the highlights more and more. If you go to far, your job in the darkroom will be almost impossible to get detail in the highlights when printing. If you stop early, or as it is called "pulling" your negative, your highlights won't be developed as much. The old saying goes, lacking a densitometer, you should be able to put a negative down on a newspaper and be able to read through the highlights... but films have changed too over the years but it seems to hold water just the same... Now if you over develop, your highlights will keep developing, like I said earlier, and if you don't stop it soon enough, your negatives will be know as being "bullet proof" which is a bad thing! There are a number of changes you can do to slow the process though. One being is to ease up on the agitation. This will help in lowering the contrast build up. A good test for you to do to see the exact results is to shoot a whole roll on one scene including sun and deep shadows. Now go into the darkroom and do what are called "clip tests". This is the process of taking a few frames from the roll and processing "normally" or manufacturer recommended times. Look at the clip and get ready to process another clip. This time doing it -10% off the time, the third clip do at -20%. Now for the final few clips, from the starting time you did clip #1 add 10% and the next one add 20%. Now get into the printing mode and print a frame from each. Take notes because this is the start of finding your perfect time for processing! Most of the time, you will find that -10%, -15% of the manufacturer's time is better/optimum. You will find, on a cloudy day though, with the info you have gained doing this clip testing, you will push your film to add the needed snap to your prints to make them sparkle more!Doing this, prepare yourself for several nights in the darkroom but the info you get on "your process" in invaluable! If you use different developers, it is wise to do the whole process over for each developer you use! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now