manojit_pusty1 Posted September 5, 2016 Share Posted September 5, 2016 <p>I used the following formula to make D76<br>Water 125F/52C 750ml<br>Metol 2g<br>Sodium Sulfite (anhydrous) 100g<br>Hydroquinone 5g<br>Borax (granular) 2g<br>Cold water to make 1000ml<br>Freshly prepared</p><p>Fixer: Sodium Hyposulphate Pentahydrate (20 g in 300 ml water)</p><p>Dev: stock solution 7 minutes 24 C <br>Ilford HP5 Plus</p><p><strong>The final result : THE FILM WAS ALMOST TRANSPARENT WITH VERY VERY FAINT IMAGES (CLOSE TO NONE) IN SOME NEGATIVES.</strong></p><p><strong>WHY DID THIS HAPPEN????</strong></p><p> </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTC Photography Posted September 5, 2016 Share Posted September 5, 2016 <p>Do you have some negative ok<br> What about the boarder, is the boarder black ?<br> Reason for thin negative, development time not long enough.<br> You should cut out a piece of film put in a cup with same developer, see how long it takes to get it<br> becomes black. </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_shriver Posted September 5, 2016 Share Posted September 5, 2016 <p>Are all of the chemicals you used photo grade? Impurities can be a very bad thing. Or maybe one of the ingredients went bad? Both hydroquinone and metol can go bad, they turn brown.<br> You can see if your D-23 and sodium sulfite are good by mixing 250ml of D-23.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James G. Dainis Posted September 5, 2016 Share Posted September 5, 2016 Did the numbers and lettering on the edges of the film come out faint also or are they black? James G. Dainis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glen_h Posted September 7, 2016 Share Posted September 7, 2016 <p>Photo grade is about the lowest grade for chemicals. (Technical might be the only one lower.) </p> <p>You can pay a lot more, and buy reagent grade for the same result.</p> -- glen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manojit_pusty1 Posted September 7, 2016 Author Share Posted September 7, 2016 <p>THERE ARE NO BORDERS.<br> THE NUMBERS AND LETTERS ARE GONE, TOTAL BLANK. BUT THE FILM IS NOT COMPLETELY TRANSPARENT.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zelph_young Posted September 7, 2016 Share Posted September 7, 2016 <p>Underdeveloped or underexposed. Did you remember to set the ISO of the film correctly?</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig_shearman1 Posted September 8, 2016 Share Posted September 8, 2016 From the time and temperature you used you should have gotten the film edge numbers even if the roll had never gone through a camera. Sounds like problem with having made the developer from scratch. I suppose there's some fun in doing that. But for my money just buying D-76 is much easier and less likely to have a problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James G. Dainis Posted September 8, 2016 Share Posted September 8, 2016 No edge letters or numbers? The film was never developed. Everything got washed off in the fixer. James G. Dainis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manojit_pusty1 Posted September 9, 2016 Author Share Posted September 9, 2016 <p>After I mixed the chemicals, some half and hours later I saw white flakes floating in the bottle. I used a teflon or something like that bottle.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manojit_pusty1 Posted September 12, 2016 Author Share Posted September 12, 2016 <p>Can I find if my developer is ok, using the that part of the film that extends out of the roll ?</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now