nikos_k Posted June 15, 2015 Share Posted June 15, 2015 <p>I have a few rolls of macophoto u64c that have expired in 2004. At what EI should I expose it and what development time is suggested in D76?</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glen_h Posted June 15, 2015 Share Posted June 15, 2015 <p>I have used film 40 or 50 years old, or developed old exposed film, at the normal time and temperature. Well, usually diafine at its usual times and temperature. </p> <p>If it has been kept reasonably cool, cool basement or inner room, it should be fine.</p> <p>HC-110 is a favorite developer for old film, so you might look into that. But 2004 isn't all that old, as film goes, except for the very high speed films.</p> -- glen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nikos_k Posted June 16, 2015 Author Share Posted June 16, 2015 <p>Should I try it at box speed? I will definitely get HC-110. So far I have been mixing my own D76, but it seems not to be the best all around developer.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_waller Posted June 16, 2015 Share Posted June 16, 2015 <p>My rule of thumb is to give an additional stop of exposure per decade past the sell-by date. So halve the box speed and maybe give an extra 10 percent on development time to counter poss of contrast.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glen_h Posted June 17, 2015 Share Posted June 17, 2015 <p>I have had fine results with Panatomic-X in Diafine at close to the recommended speed. </p> <p>I don't know anyone who would want to try Panatomic-X at four or five stops below box speed. (I have used it 40 or 50 years old.)</p> <p>But half or one stop more exposure is often good for negative film. I usually round toward more exposure when I am deciding. </p> <p>For higher speed film, more exposure is probably good, but that removes much of the reason to use higher speed film.<br> Someday I will try some old TMZ at 200 or 400 and see what comes out.</p> -- glen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Gammill Posted June 19, 2015 Share Posted June 19, 2015 <p>I would try a roll and start with box speed, but make a couple more shots of each subject giving additional exposure and process in HC110. Just see what looks (and scans or prints best). Good chance of getting box speed since it is a slow film. I've always gotten box speed out of Panatomic-X (even a 1964 roll which was sold as ASA 40).</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fotohuis RoVo Posted June 24, 2015 Share Posted June 24, 2015 <p>Develop it according the Efke 50 specs.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now