ksporry Posted April 3, 2015 Share Posted April 3, 2015 Hi guys, So, I got myself a hasselblad H1 with a p30 back and standard 80mm lens. Now I'm looking at getting a second lens for portraits and headshots. The prime contenders are the 100/2.2, the 120/4 macro, and the 150/3.2. With 35mm/full frame cameras I just lived the 100 and 135 primes, which would suggest the 120/4 or 150/3.2. However, the wise aperture of the 100/2.2 quite appeals to me :) I haven't found many comparisons (but I only just started looking), so if people could help point me in the right direction or maybe provide their own experiences, that'd be grand! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDMvW Posted April 3, 2015 Share Posted April 3, 2015 <p>"Brokeh", as someone here felicitously miscalled it, from wider aperture is nice if the lens is pleasing wide open.<br> So that may be a factor.<br> 80mm (normal) is not bad, but I'd personally go, and did, with 120mm; but on that camera that is an f/2.8, ....<br> Lots of people like a longer tele for portraiture, especially if their subject has a large proboscis<em>.</em><br> <em> </em><br> The "traditional" portrait/headshot focal length is more in the 100-120mm range on 120 film, but huge numbers of portraits in the day were done on non-interchangeable 80mm TLRs and nobody complained.<em><br /></em></p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ksporry Posted April 3, 2015 Author Share Posted April 3, 2015 Are you saying some of these lenses have s not so nice bokeh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDMvW Posted April 4, 2015 Share Posted April 4, 2015 <p>Re: Bokeh<br> Lenses and lens designs can vary in the 'smoothness' of their out-of-focus highlights. Some have more nearly circular shape when stopped down, others hexagonal, or other blocky shape. Wide open, nearly all of them are circular, of course.<br> The only way to tell is to try them since some lenses that don't look likely can work just fine.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ksporry Posted April 6, 2015 Author Share Posted April 6, 2015 Yep, I know bokeh is very personal. Thought about it a lot and compared the options to what I normally shoot with on an SLR. Usually I shoot with a 135/2 which I just love to death! I also like the 100/2.8 macros on SLRs. Taking into consideration the crop for a 645 with a P30 back, the 150/3.2 comes closest. I heard the 120/4 is one of the best in sharpness and bokeh (latter again personal taste), that one would be my second choice, with the 150 being nr one for now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_narsuitus Posted April 12, 2015 Share Posted April 12, 2015 <blockquote> <p>"... I'm looking at getting a second lens for portraits and headshots."</p> <p>"... if people could help point me in the right direction or maybe provide their own experiences, that'd be grand!"</p> </blockquote> <p>I used my standard 80mm f/2.8 lens for full-length, 3/4 length, half-length, and environmental portraits.</p> <p>I used a 180mm f/4.5 lens for my head and shoulders, head, and face portraits.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now