Your least prefered category

[Lou_Meluso]

<p>When shooting for myself I'm pretty democratic. I'll shoot anything, everything I think looks neat. That's the only requirement. I walk around with, what my father use to call, a clear head. I can always edit images out later. Why set limits on yourself? In a micro second that cliche can be heartfelt, meaningful image. All subjects have been "done" before, the difference is what <strong>you</strong> bring to the party.</p>

[bethe_fisher]

<p>People; portraits. Though I'd kinda like to learn how to do them well, portraits are not something I'd shoot when I have free time. Give me a trail through the woods by a nice stream any day.</p>

[dan_south]

<p>Jeff, I would call that sunset 'art'! The unexpected nature of it is delightful. I bet you could sell those in Seattle or Vancouver.</p>

[roberto_s.]

<blockquote>

<p>When you engage in the photographic activity for your own pleasure (not for hire) which is the one category you do not want to "shoot"?</p>

</blockquote>

<p>For me there's no difference, since I quite often came up with such a mess that you couldn't even tell what was in the viewfinder. Actually is a low tactic, but it improves my self-esteem by making me feel an artist. And, since I introduced Mrs Art, today conductor Claudio Abbado dies at 80. Great artist he was, and great person.</p>