zarrir_junior Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 <p>What is the effect i should expect if i selenium tone a stained pyro negative? I have lots of selenium in stock and i´m thinking of doing that for archival purposes.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peterbcarter Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 <p>I use it all the time. I use Wd2D+ and it works well to give a +1 stop boost with a little control on the grain. Ymmv with other pyros.</p> <p>Before....</p> <p><img src="http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5122/5205622728_b72bd5fc5f_d.jpg" alt="" /></p> <p>After......</p> <p><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4127/5205026415_fa3fd847bc_d.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="319" /></p> <p>Scanned by vuescan into a jpg, optimized for the "before" scan. No touch ups. With the amount of dynamic range that pyros have, the selenium tone gives it a bit more depth.</p> <p>I use 1:3 for about 5 mins. I get about 30 rolls per liter. It is unforgiving of bad fixing and not enough<br> washing.</p> <p>The camera was an OM10 with a 50/1.8. Film was KB400. EI200</p> <p> </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zarrir_junior Posted November 26, 2010 Author Share Posted November 26, 2010 <p>Excellent, thanks for the samples!</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peterbcarter Posted November 26, 2010 Share Posted November 26, 2010 <p>The difference can be subtle, but I subjectively think it gives it better edges.</p> <p>I now add it as part of my normal neg development work flow. When I calibrate my development times (Grey card and densitometer) I include this as part of the process. You just have to make sure the film is properly fixed and washed else the leftover silver will create "spots" you can't get rid of. Like everything else, good work flow gives good results.</p> <p> </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wieslaw1 Posted November 27, 2010 Share Posted November 27, 2010 <p>Based on my experience Se does not improve contrast of negatives developed in pyros, at least not in the pyro I am using and Kodak Se. The stain constitutes a surface coating on the negative and blocks diffusion of Se solution so you do not see any difference caused by toning.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peterbcarter Posted November 28, 2010 Share Posted November 28, 2010 <p>My evidence concludes otherwise. It is exactly the same effect on non-pyro as with pyro. As for the stain, it is not a blanket. It is a stain inversely proportional to the silver; that's how staining developers work.</p> <p>"<a title="Selenium" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selenium">Selenium</a> toning is a popular archival toning process, converting metallic silver to <a title="Silver selenide" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silver_selenide">silver selenide</a>." (wikipedia) You would have to create an unbelievable chemical barrier for this not to work. It may be slower due to the pyro, but the 5 minutes I baste works fine for all developers I use.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now