jim_peterson2 Posted November 17, 2010 Share Posted November 17, 2010 <p>I've been learning my way around WordPress and decided to put together a little site about my film cameras. If you have any interest please check it out at <a href="http://chemicalcameras.wordpress.com/">http://chemicalcameras.wordpress.com/</a><br> All comments, critiques or other thoughts are welcome!</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
d_f11 Posted November 17, 2010 Share Posted November 17, 2010 <p>The word "chemical" to indicate film cameras/usage does a DISservice to film usage/users. 'Sounds highly toxic, like a headline for a "green" article. Kindly change the name. Thank you.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim_peterson2 Posted November 18, 2010 Author Share Posted November 18, 2010 <p>Ah... hadn't really thought of that. In my mind it has more to do with chemistry or alchemy than anything toxic. But if enough people have the same reaction I would certainly consider changing it. So far I've had lots of feedback on a couple other forums and no one but you has said anything negative about the title; although I know some folks simply choose to remain silent when they have negative opinions about something... Anyway, if I did change it I'm not sure what I would change it to. "Film Cameras" is very plain and boring. "Analog Cameras" is way over used... </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
d_f11 Posted November 21, 2010 Share Posted November 21, 2010 <p>If I can come up with a good name, I'll let you know...</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbcooper Posted December 6, 2010 Share Posted December 6, 2010 <blockquote> <p>The word "chemical" to indicate <a href="../website-creation-forum/00XhF3" target="_blank">film</a> cameras/usage does a DISservice to film usage/users. 'Sounds highly toxic, like a headline for a "green" article. Kindly change the name. Thank you.</p> </blockquote> <p>Opinions vary. Most folks know 'toxic' and 'chemical' don't necessarily go together. I like the name, and think it's apt and quite descriptive...much better and more accurate than "analog cameras". I grew up elbow deep in developer, fixer, and hypo. There are no smells quite like glacial acetic acid or sepia and brown (sulfide) toners.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim_peterson2 Posted December 6, 2010 Author Share Posted December 6, 2010 <p>Thanks! I kind of like it too and don't have any immediate plans to change it. :)</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jennifer_spencer Posted December 7, 2010 Share Posted December 7, 2010 <p>I like the name, and I shoot film. It's intriguing. </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now