Jump to content

Love of Leica, Lack of Funds


andrew_viny

Recommended Posts

Gentlemen (and Ladies),

 

I have an incurable disease. I love the Leica M. It was the first camera I ever wanted. I honestly can not think of a more beautiful

camera. For me it defines photography and passion. When I hold one it feels special. It really feels like magic for me to hold one. I

currently have a Canon 30D with a 24-70 f/2.8 and a 135 f/2. I have really enjoyed shooting portraits with my 135 f/2 in the recent history.

I think that I'd take any M model. I'd like a meter (one that would sit on top of the camera would be alright with me, though in camera would

be nice). I'd like to spend as little money as possible. I love to take portraits. I think a 50mm or 70mm lens would suit me alright but I'd

like the most versatile set up I can get with the lowest expense. I think I'd like a standard to medium telephoto with a wide aperture.

 

I don't know a huge amount about Leica and don't have a huge amount of experience with them. In addition to answering the questions

below I'd appreciate anything you can tell me that you think I should know.

 

So the questions are:

 

What body should I buy? What lens should I pair with it? What else do I need? and where is a good place to buy?

 

I think that I'd spend what is needed but anything over $1500 would be a lot for me. I know this doesn't get you very far in the wonderful

world of Leica but as I said money is a concern.

 

~Andrew

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you had the money for a 30D and the two lenses you have you could have bought a used M6 and 50mm Summicron for that amount. Be that as it may, There are good deals on used M cameras out there. I just picked up a new in the box M4-P for $800, and it is new in the box. It's a matter of priorities, you just need to figure what yours are. There are a lot of good deals on M cameras out there right now but it takes some searching. Buying digital cameras is a losing proposition i.e., you need to recognize there is little resale value in them. You buy them to use and should know they will be worth little in 18 months. Prices on Leica M cameras have dropped in the last few years but that will stabilize and they will hold a certain value, unlike any digital camera. The latter will simply continue to drop at an alarming rate. I have a beautiful Canon D30 (not 30D) that cost $3000 when new back in 2001. I'd be lucky to get $150 for it today, even though it is still capable of taking excellent photos if I do my part.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, $1500 is a bit of a problem. An M6 Classic in black with working meter base $1100 & up. Leica's a best with Leica glass. 50mm Summicron lens runs around $600. You could get an older elmar which are well made but not as good as the Summicron. Your other choice is to get a CV lens, in which case I'd go for the 35mm f1.7 Ultron, runs around $400. You could instead of the M6 go for the M5 & have the meter adjusted because there is an issue with the battery & meter which you would need to look into. Leica and Leica glass are not loosing their value with the influx of digital.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ken Hansen Photo, private Leica and Rollei dealer in New York. The best, cleanest Leicas at the the lowest prices. I have

been his satisfied costumer for almost 30 years. The most knowledgeable and honest dealer I have met. (212) 879 3263

email KHPNY19@aol.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Andrew,

I'm curious as to why you have an obsession with Leica, but you say you don't have a lot of experience with them. Are

you're sure you want to work with them? I have an M2 (have used M3s also), but in many ways it's an ergonomic

nightmare compared with modern cameras. Loading is ridiculous. It balances poorly with a telephoto lens, and there's no

good place to put your right fingers. Glasses? Forget about seeing anything. Even with contacts, it's difficult to see the

wide frames. The lenses are also ergonomical nightmares, especially if you're used to Japanese lenses. Meter on top? A

waste of time. You're much better off with a handheld incident meter. Low top speed. Slow flash sync. Tripod socket on the west coast.

 

However, if you've picked up a Leica and you can live with it (I'll never sell mine) and are on a budget, I think the last

place to look is the big dealers. I picked up my M2 from a local trader for $700, and it's in beautiful shape. He was selling

a collapsing Summicron for about $200. There are bargains, but like buying a car, you have to go private. There are also deals on Ebay if

your timing is right. I recently picked up a mint Elmar-M 50 for half of what KEH is selling, and half of what others were getting.

 

As far as the advice about the M5, you better be sure you want one. I got the chance to pick one up recently, and when

people say they're big, they mean BIG! The thing is a veritable Frankenstein camera.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

M models are superb, handling is fast and precise. M6 with its built-in meter is easiest and probably best value right now;

M2, 3, or 4 is also great if you don't mind using a handheld meter (not really that hard). The 50 Summicron, any generation,

is fantastic as an all-round lens, and great for informal portraits. Whatever you get, make sure it is fully serviced. I'd buy

from a dealer. Photovillage in NYC, Sherry Krauter at Golden Touch in US, Leicashop in Vienna, Ffordes or Robert White in

UK are worth browsing. But a warning -- Leicas are addictive!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Scott - I'd never get an M5. I think frankenstein camera is a perfect characterization of it. As far as Leica's being

nightmares I disagree. I think they are designed in a way that forces you to think and consider unlike modern cameras the

photographers feels more in control. For me it's honestly like a stick shift car versus an automatic. Automatic is more convenient and maybe even quicker, but there's a charm and joy in using the stick that you don't get with the automatic.

IDK I might be crazy. I'm an engineering student and I find such a beauty in these little German machines. Why is a

meter on top a waste of time?

 

~Andrew

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Andrew,

Start reading rangefinderforum.com and get an M3 (there are classifieds there) with the rigid or DR Summicron 50 plus a

small Seconic lightmeter. If you will have some money left afterwards, buy a Nikon CS 5000 and a developing tank. Start

with Tri-X and D-76. After 6 months you will understand what Leica photography is about, then you will progress from there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a <a href="http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost-

classifieds/showproduct.php/product/12377/cat/all">Leica M3 double stroke</a> on rangefinderforum classifieds (I

don't know the seller). I would stick to an M3 since you want the longer lenses. It's harder to focus longer lenses with

a .72 magnification. I find the honesty factor at rangefinderforum classifieds to be generally higher than that of eBay.

<p>

I love my Voigtlander Nokton 50mm f/1.5, which can be bought used for $250-$300 (or new for $359). There's two

used at keh.com right now and cameraquest sells them new. You also can pick up a vintage Summarit 50 f/1.5 for

the same price range if you want to stick with Leica products. Adorama has two right now.

<p>

The Voigtlander VC Meter ($179 via cameraquest) is a good idea, especially for slide film. It's quite easy to use.

<p> Some posters here seem to poo-poo their Leicas so much I don't see why they still own one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Andrew,

I was using a Voigtlander meter on top of my Leica, but simply parking an uncoupled meter on top of a camera is, in my

opinion, not especially useful. For one thing, the VC meters have the reputation of being loose, and mine did keep falling

off. So you keep it in your pocket. Then lose it like I did (probably in the house somewhere...). If you use a tele lens, the

meter's view isn't accurate enough. I find an incident meter in the pocket is MUCH more useful and accurate. For the same

money as the VC, you can get a digital Sekonic. Also, many recommend the M3, which I had. That is, until I picked up an

M2 which had a .72 finder. It's much more useful and just as accurate--I have no trouble focusing a 90 f/2 wide-open.

Scott

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is Jim Kuehl still out there doing business? A prince of a guy and 100% honest. I bought a "mint" M5 chrome two lug from him years ago. It arrived more like "new in the original box"! Sherry Kräuter CLA'd it and said the meter was spot on when she got it. She added the third lug for me.

 

If Kuehl's around, he's your man. Good luck.

Jeffrey L. T. von Gluck
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wen, Ken Hansen does not have a website; he does sell through eBay. Ken, a straitght shooting old timer, hates digital.

Just call 212 879-3263, or email him KHPNY19@aol.com. Once again, he does have the cleanest Leica and Rollei's at the

lowest prices. Over the almost 30 years I have bought all kinds of equipment from him - first at his several Manhattan

stores and now privately - I have learned to admire his knowledge and expertise. More important, you can take Ken's word

to the bank.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would suggest buying five things that should be affordable within the budget you have described: a Leica M2 body in good condition,+/- $750; a clean, lubricate and adjust (CLA) service for the M2 from a reputable firm such as Kindermann in Canada, +/- $250; a Nikkor 85mm f/2 lens in Leica thread mount (LTM), +/- $300; an LTM-to-bayonet adapter to allow mounting the LTM lens on a Leica M body, +/- $50; and a used Gossen Digital Luna-Pro, Scout 3, or other handheld light meter in good working condition, +/- $75 . If you can stick to the estimated prices shown, this would provide you with an M-body, an older portrait lens with an excellent reputation for optical quality, and exposure control, for a total of $1,425 plus tax and shipping, which (depending on sales tax in your area) ought to be within your stated budget. The Nikkor 85mm f/2 LTM lens was one of the lenses that, in the hands of photojournalists such as David Douglas Duncan, helped to build Nikon's reputation in the 1950s, and is still capable of taking excellent portraits. They show up from time to time in the hands of reputable online firms such as KEH Photo, and on popular auction sites. If you can't find a Nikkor 85mm f/2 LTM in good condition, I would suggest considering a Canon 85mm f/1.9 in LTM mount as a comparably-priced alternative. If and when you could come up with additional funds for other lenses, I would suggest considering the Canon 35mm f/2 in LTM as a wide-angle lens, +/- $300; and the Canon 50mm f/1.4 in LTM as a normal lens, +/- $200. There are other possible choices for any of these items, such as other Leica M bodies or Voightlander/Cosina (V/C) LTM lenses in comparable focal lengths. If you are able to afford more expensive lenses later on, you can upgrade to Leica M-mount lenses such as the 90mm f/2 Summicron or 90mm f/2.8 Elmarit, the 35mm f/2 Summicron, and the 50mm f/1.4 Summilux, all issued in multiple versions of increasing optical quality over the years, and all still in current production. While the superb performance of the Leica lenses is at the heart of Leica's reputation, the M2 and the Nikkor and Canon LTM lenses from the 1950s and 1960s offer an affordable path into owning and learning to use Leica rangefinders, and excellent performance for the money.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Andrew,

You should be able to get a nice M series with a lens and meter within your $1500 budget. I got a very nice M-3 on e-Bay from Henry's in Toronto for under $450. It was better than described ( a few nicks in the chrome on the base plate but otherwise very clean, bright finder and the shutter seems accurate with transparencies). I also picked up a 50mm Dual Range Summicron (without the goggles which allow it to focus closer than the normal 0.7m) on e-Bay for $445. It is absolutely pristine, and I am very pleased with the its rendering. Finally, I bought an MR meter from KEH for about $90. (Either it is still spot on or the M's shutter is equally off. I also bought a current generation 50 Chron which I use on my R-D1 on e-Bay for around $600. (I bought the DR because i wanted a vintage lens for the M-3 event though the current lens renders with a tiny bit more contrast.) I also previously owned the CV 50mm 1.5 which was part of a Bessa R kit I sold when i converted to digital some years ago. I agree strongly with Christopher; it is probably the best value in leica compatable lenses on the market.

 

This is my second M-3. I owned one years ago as a PJ student but had to sell it when the post graduation realities of rent, car payments and low wages forced a choice of selling the Leica or bank robbery. I agree with you that the Leica Ms (except for the M-5) are design perfection.

 

My advice: be patient, look at e-Bay and the reputable on-line stores.

 

Good luck

 

Bob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...