Jump to content

Fuji Finepix F100fd Here is the dreaded pink banding on my sample


dan_k6

Recommended Posts

If anybody cares,

 

Here is a brief review of this camera.

 

I bought it from B&H after being on the waiting list. The camera is NOT made in

Japan as some other are stating. It is made in China....and it feels it.

 

Exterior is supposedly metal but it feels like plastic and it looks like its

painted plastic.

 

Camera is slow and the control wheel is way too sensitive.

 

The battery/SD card compartment has a thin strip of metal that separates the two

slots. You can permanently deform this piece and render the camera useless. My

2 year old Canon SD630 has molded compartments!

 

Picture quality at ISO 100 is actually pretty good. ISO 400 with DR at 400%

looks pretty good too (in good lighting of course)

 

Camera indeed suffers from pink banding at as low as ISO 400 which pretty much

renders this camera useless. Fuji needs to fix this. Actually I don't know how

Fuji let this camera make it to production.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frans, look extra close. There is a pink band along the left side.

 

Fred, Relax! I'm just letting whoever is looking at this camera know that I to have a bad sample.

 

If you know anything about this camera or read anything about the first samples, they have a pink banding issue at higher ISO's. I'm just sharing my experience.

 

Don't take things so literally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got interested in this camera after I thought my Canon SD800IS

had died. It turned out to be reduced capacity in its lithium

battery, less than a year old, cough.

 

This is the first serious Fujifilm F model with 28mm equivalent lens,

my most important requirement. It lacks optical viewfinder, a

highly touted feature of the SD800IS, although in practice it is

difficult to do accurate framing with a ~60% viewfinder. I mostly

take outdoor pictures. I'm not sure I can cope with an LCD only

viewfinder.

 

On the other hand, Fuji says the F100fd has wide dynamic range.

The SD800IS really destroys highlights, which seems true of all

Canon P&S models, and even their DSLRs without raw mode.

 

One consideration not addressed is the control layout. The F100fd

looks totally different from the F50fd. Reviewers have complained

about Fuji's fiddly user interface. Whereas the SD800IS, and

probably most Canon P&S models, have well designed user interfaces.

The SD800IS buttons move too easily from jostling in transit, but

when they are set correctly, they work according to expectation.

 

Regarding pink banding: it doesn't look too bad to me. There are

many more important issues in using a lowish-end digicam.<div>00PDnE-43016984.thumb.jpg.cfae84be8cf6f3f06cc3513c2f9d591d.jpg</div>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>If you know anything about this camera or read anything about the first samples, they have a pink banding issue at higher ISO's. ... Don't take things so literally.

 

Guess that's why you still bought the camera after knowing and reading such things about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have my SD800IS permanently set on -.3 EV, Frans.

Also an "ess" curve defined in GIMP and Photoshop.

What sickens me most is wasting time bucket-filling white sky

with blue selected from between tree branches.

It's almost as time consuming as-- horrors-- scanning film!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bill,

 

-.3EV is obviously not enough exposure reduction. If your camera has a histogram capability you should read up on Expose to the Right. You shouldn't have to make the corrections you are making. If the sky has details, but is too light to your liking then you should apply Shadows/Highlights or even better a density mask. An s-curve isn't going to do anything for overexposed areas; it makes matters only worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bill, that's an extremely contrasty scene. Use your histogram and dial in as much compensation as is needed. Also, you could try setting contrast and saturation to minus something to give you a bit more latitude. Don't expose for the shadows with a small sensor digital.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[[Print film could easily handle this scene.]]

 

And how would slide film handle the scene?

 

You aimed the camera at the dark rocks that were in shadow and then are surprised that the camera exposed for them? I don't understand the problem here Bill. Were you expecting the camera to function in some other way?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Perhaps you are expecting the camera to optimize every small area of the picture automatically! I don't think any camera can do that by itself. You would then need a matrix of algorithms working on fuzzy logic in each zone of the picture. Yes it is theoretically possible. But you need to build a Super Computer inside the camera! From the picture the green vegetal texture seems superb to me. It also graduates along the perspective beautifully. You could take a second look at that and try building up similar imaging in the rest of the picture.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did recompose. Why would I post my good picture in this thread?

We're talking about the Fuji F100fd.

 

I'm tired of being forced to account for camera shortcomings

by always recomposing to avoid wide dynamic range.

The F100fd might be the camera for me. Or the S5, if I could get a Sherpa

to carry it around for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...