aginbyte Posted March 21, 2008 Share Posted March 21, 2008 Why would it be Jorg Schmidt-Reitwein's? He wasn't the Director of Photography on that film, he did Nosferatu. It was Thomas Mauch who did Stroszeck. And credit for a film is almost always given to the director, no matter who photographs it. In many cases, there are two directors of photography, one for principal photography and the other for second unit or special photography. Am I missing something here, Spencer? Is there some hidden question that is not clear? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keith_leonin Posted March 23, 2008 Share Posted March 23, 2008 So, if I were suddenly struck blind and asked a friend to take a picture of Half Dome in a specific way from a specific spot, would I still be the photographer? Or would it be my friend? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hjoseph7 Posted March 24, 2008 Share Posted March 24, 2008 Sudio Photographers back in the 19th century hardly ever clicked the shutter. They were more like film producers setting up the props, backrounds, pose etc. The person who clicked the shutter was usually an assistant, but the Studio photographer got almost all the credit for taking the picture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david_henderson Posted March 24, 2008 Share Posted March 24, 2008 There seems to be at least one reported example of a well known photographer not firing the shutter himself, and thats Gregory Crewdson. I don't think that the authorship of his work is a doubt in his mind or those of the people and organisations that spend huge amounts on his work. And I have little doubt who the cheques get made out to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yeffe Posted March 24, 2008 Share Posted March 24, 2008 Robert Leverant wrote a slim volume years ago: Zen and the Art of Photography. The goal of the Zen photographer is a picture that 'it' shoots, not you. As in Zen archery where the target is 'hitting its self'. Zen archers need not even hit the physical target, and I suspect that Zen photographers need not make a technically or artistically wonderful picture. Maybe that's a relief. I wouldn't know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbs Posted March 26, 2008 Share Posted March 26, 2008 Spencer~ A film and a photograph are two different things, as I understand them. Your original question; "So, with photography, what if I were to give the camera to someone else and direct them what to shoot; would I still be the photographer?", has already given the answer. Your next question; "So, Jay, who's image would it be?", is dependent upon the agreement of the director and photographer. Photographers sell or give away their rights to copyright all the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now