brooks_lester Posted February 15, 2008 Share Posted February 15, 2008 I just shot 5 rolls of 400VC2 in Hawaii and like the results, however, I was slightly disappointed with the amount of grain when I scanned the processed negatives. I'd love to be able to shoot at ISO400 on my next vacation, but I may use the 160 speed Portrasor 400NC3 if the new 400VC3 isn't a noticeable improvement over the 400VC2. (I'm not saying I didn't like the 400VC2, but after shooting some 400NC2 I noticed that the 400VC2 definitely has more grain...) TIA Here's an example of Portra 400NC2: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2291/2244575284_919210bc1e_b.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phule Posted February 15, 2008 Share Posted February 15, 2008 Brooks, FYI: You don't need to start a new thread for something like that (and especially not with a completely different subject). You can just submit a reply to your original post with the correct link. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now