mike_smith54 Posted July 24, 2007 Share Posted July 24, 2007 Looking to take some pictures at a fair with a 35mm slr camera and was wondering if there would be a difference with taking pictures at a larger aperature, faster shutter speed and smaller aperature, slower shutter speed? If so, what would the differences be? Also how well will ISO 100 film work at night? Would ISO 400 film be better? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike_smith54 Posted July 24, 2007 Author Share Posted July 24, 2007 ***In Immobile Objects*** Would there be a difference with taking pictures at a larger aperature, faster shutter speed and smaller aperature, slower shutter speed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darius.tulbure Posted July 24, 2007 Share Posted July 24, 2007 Well, yes... I think DOF is one of the differences. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charles_stobbs3 Posted July 24, 2007 Share Posted July 24, 2007 400 would be better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richard_hawkes Posted July 24, 2007 Share Posted July 24, 2007 Am I missing the point? Surely the answer is that you will get more camera blur, especially when capturing the fast moving rides. This may be the effect you're looking for however. I will look forward to seeing the shots on PN ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sam_thompson2 Posted July 24, 2007 Share Posted July 24, 2007 It depends on what you want to take pictures of. If you want to take pictures of the night using a tripod. Then you will want to shoot at smaller aperture to reduce depth of field and makes the lights more twinkly. http://www.popphoto.com/howto/3519/how-to-shoot-nightscapes.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
younes Posted July 24, 2007 Share Posted July 24, 2007 "Sam Song, Jul 24, 2007; 08:52 a.m. Then you will want to shoot at smaller aperture to reduce depth of field and makes the lights more twinkly. " smaller apertures (larger f-stop numbers) actually INCREASE depth of field (and give greater foreground to background sharpness). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sam_thompson2 Posted July 24, 2007 Share Posted July 24, 2007 Yeah, bigger F numbers, more depth of field, makes lights more pointy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Currie Posted July 24, 2007 Share Posted July 24, 2007 If I were going out at night, I'd use ISO 400 rather than 100. You can get away with 100 for many things, but you'll have more choices with 400. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lost america Posted July 25, 2007 Share Posted July 25, 2007 If you're shooting with a tripod use iso 100. Stop down as much as you can. If your exposures are longer, who cares, you're on a tripod. The image will have less grain. The more you stop down the longer the exposure so more time-related effects will happen ie: cars driving by, star-trails etc. Yes, lights will also have a more pronounced twinkle as well. Visit my technique page for more info: http://www.lostamerica.com/technique.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pmind Posted July 26, 2007 Share Posted July 26, 2007 May I suggest Fuji Provia 400 for slide film. Used this film for years at night with great results. Reciprocity failure is measured in minutes, plus it can be pushed/pulled all over the place. Paul Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now