habsphoto Posted June 14, 2007 Share Posted June 14, 2007 I have just uploaded some comparison shots of Efke IR 820c shot side by side Kodak HIE. HIE shot at my standard 200ASA Kodak speed and using a large bracket I came up with a TTL speed for the Efke at 25asa. 25Red filter does not do substantial infrared effects on the Efke. Freestyle Photo Supplies is considering having EFKE produce an AURA 820c with the glow effect of HIE. (no anti-halation backing).i will try this test again with a IR cutoff filter and see how it goes. see my portfolio on Photo.net for samples. http://www.photo.net/photodb/member-photos?user_id=1004854 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rich_ullsmith1 Posted June 14, 2007 Share Posted June 14, 2007 Thanks for those, Steve. Do you know, is this Efke essentially the Maco 820? My experience with the Maco has been ISO 3 with a 89b filter to get a good neg, while with the HIE a 29 red works fine. Do you think the main difference between your examples is the antihalation, or different sensitivity? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zach_abubeker Posted June 14, 2007 Share Posted June 14, 2007 thanks very much steve. did you notice a major difference between Tmax-rs and xtol, that is if you have ever used xtol for this film. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
habsphoto Posted June 14, 2007 Author Share Posted June 14, 2007 I have understand that EFKE is the same factory that made the MACO and it is the same film.So I imagine the AURA would be the same as well. The main difference is the infrared sensitivity I think, there is ample room for push processing. I shoot HIE with a 23-Red most of the time and still get a striking IR effect. I have never used XTOL, but I have been using the satndard Tmax RS automated processing for about 10 years with no problems. before that i processed HIE myself with D-76 and Crone-C additive, but i was more interested in contrast 10 years ago, now i like a little less contrast in case hand-coloring is needed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elia_freddi Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 Thank Steve for the nice comparison. <br /> It's clear that a simple 25 Filter is not enough to get any strong IR effect on the Efke, as expected. I guess a darker filter like Hoya R72 is needed to get any. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rustys pics Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 I shot a 35mm roll of the Efke infrared recently as well. It's nearly identical to the MACO stuff from a few years back. So far I've determined as you have, that a #25 red filter does nothing for it. I've had better luck with a wratten 92 deep red filter mounted behind the lens of my Olympus OM-1n. ISO appears to be about 12 in bright sunlight with this filter. I process in Clayton F-76+ for 14 minutes. Have a look here to see some examples from that roll: http://www.flickr.com/photos/arcanefuture/ Also note that the film is very sensitive to static electricity! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter_fitzsimons Posted June 18, 2007 Share Posted June 18, 2007 I have used the Efke (yes same as Maco) with a no. 29 dark red filter and the results are good, printed at a filter grade of 4. This film is great with an opaque filter for full IR effect. Peter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
habsphoto Posted January 8, 2008 Author Share Posted January 8, 2008 New images up on the flickr site of EFKE 820c 120 size long exposures in wind. Let me know what you all think.<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now