Jump to content

best tripod head for macro photography


mariellen romer

Recommended Posts

Fellow photographers, I hope you can advise me.

 

I am looking for advice on the best tripod head for DSLR macro work. In a leap

of faith (I will accept the charge of hope triumphing over prudence until such

time as I have made some really good pics from this!!) I have just bought a

Canon dslr and for sure I will need a tripod for the next steps. The research

I have done so far would point to me needing a macro rack of some kind, i see

manfrotto do one for about 55 GBP. (the 405?)

 

Any suggestions other than this? Do I need a fluid head or does this rack do

most of the heavy lifting on the macro requirements? Do ball joints work ok,

or are they to be avoided? Any alternative suggestions as to make or models?

 

I already have manfrotto classic tripod legs.

 

Any inputs, thoughts and particularly gotchas, very gratefully recieved!

 

Thank you, Mariellen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are a number of tools that make various aspects of macro photography easier.

 

A particularly useful item is a focusing rail (http://www.reallyrightstuff.com/specialty/index.html). You will notice that the focusing ring on your lens is less effective the closer you are to the subject, and tends to change the magnification significantly. With a focusing rail, you set the magnification ratio and achieve focus by moving the camera back and forth with the rail.

 

Putting the camera where you want it for composition is another issue. Tripods with tilting columns can help. The ultimate tripod is arguably a Benbo, in which the legs and column can be set to any angle. You hold the camera where you want it, kick the legs into place one one foot and tighten the clamp down. Many tripods, including Gitzo and Bogen, have legs with adjustable angles. This is handy in the field, and they can open to put the camera nearly on the groung (using a stub column).

 

You can use a three-way head, including a geared head (good for table-top work), but a ball head is generally more useful. The RRS focusing rail fits into an Arca-type clamp on a ball head.

 

A right-angle viewfinder is handy for working close to the ground or when copying documents. There are a number of devices that attach to the eyepiece for this purpose.

 

For my own use, I have a Gitzo G-1227 tripod with a stub column and an Arca Swiss B1 ball head. I use a 6 inch, beveled RRS plate with a clamp instead of a geared or screw-drive focusing rail ($$$), which doubles to adjust the pivot point for stitched panoramas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2nd the Manfrotto Geared Head for macro, tabletop and architectural shooting.

 

It can basically used for any kind of photography which does not require

rapid camera (re)orientation. It is provides high precision in camera placement

and is suitable for "reflective" as opposed to "reactive" shooting.

 

I have heavy 35mm gear and a light 6X6 camera. I loan this head to a friend

from time to time for his Linhof 4X5 and it seems to suit him as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been shopping for a focusing rack/rail for some time (budget tight these days). The ReallyRightStuff item is probably very good, but it is also pretty expensive. Adorama lists a Novoflex back-and-forth rack for less money, and they have their store name on a back-and-forth, side-to-side (4-way)rack/rail.

 

In the meantime, I'm using a Benbo Trekker with the kit ball head, and making teeny little adjustments at the head and legs. I also adjust the focus, although this is anathema to purists.

 

There's a book by Lester Lefkowitz, Manual of Close-up Photography, pub 1979, that is available on the used market for reasonable prices. He covers "macro" photography as well as anyone else I've read.

 

You'll find a number of threads on macro work on these forums. My last suggestion is that you use a true macro 1:1 lens, and count on doing the focusing manually -- NO autofocus. That should bring the price of the lens down, especially on the used market.

 

You'll find a lot of discussion as to whether a 50mm or 100mm macro lens is best. Which ever you get, remember that you've got a focal length factor on a DSLR. This is compensated for by the ability to crank up the ISO rating (unless you make large prints). The main objection to the 50mm lens seems to be that it requires moving really close to the subject, and may impede light. That is ameliorated somewhat by the DSLR focal length factor, and for me personally because I prefer to shoot in the shade or on cloudy days.

 

The macro work at 1:1 can be done handheld.<div>00JQq8-34326984.jpg.27ab6c313b429591b6a9544f9333fb5c.jpg</div>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 405 ,combined with an Arca-Swisstype QR clamp makesafine combination for amcr

owork. One tool I have recently foundveryvaluable isthe Really Right Stuff MPR-CL II Nodal

Slide. I bought this initially for doing panoramic work but since then have put into into

service for precise camera positioning for macro work and a few other applications.

 

Ball heads can work fine but you'll need a hoigh quality one like the Arca-Swiss

B1Monoball, the Reallyy Right Stuff BH-55, Foba, or Linhof Profi II or III. I haven't found

others Ilike. Avoidany ballhead that uses lubricant as the lubricant will dry out, not be

precise enough,and attract dust & grit.

 

Really Right Stuff has posted a fine tripod and head tutorial at http://

www.reallyrightstuff.com/tutorials/tripods/index.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I own both an Arca Swiss Ball head and a three way pan head from Bogen. For Macro work I only use the three way head and on top of that I use a focusing rail I bought off eBay for $99 - that combination works very, very well. I hated the ball head for Macro, even though I use it for everything else. The three way head is much easier to position and allows for much finer adjustments. Look for GoShot camera on eBay - they sell the same focusing rail as the Adorama branded one, but for half the price.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

look at the RRS 192 rail system which is cheaper than the macro rail $180 vs $295...Juergen's advice is solid also although I prefer a ballhead...if you decide to go with a ballhead make sure you get a large one which will hold the camera/lens steadier when tilted...for example get the RRS BH-55 rather than the BH-40 or 25 or the Kirk BH-1 rather than the BH-3 based on my personal experience.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...