joemoree Posted October 19, 2005 Share Posted October 19, 2005 Hello everyone,I am trying to scan some 3200 speed B&W prints and they keep coming out far more grainer than the prints?I have tried on several different DPI's 300,500,800 and it still has the same effect,any suggestions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
troyammons Posted October 19, 2005 Share Posted October 19, 2005 B+W is really tough to scan. A wet scan might help. What sort of scanner ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
titrisol Posted October 19, 2005 Share Posted October 19, 2005 yes scanning real BW film will produce a lot more "grain artifacts" than those that are really there Do not use grain correction,ICE, or similar scan as transparency and pray for the best Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joemoree Posted October 19, 2005 Author Share Posted October 19, 2005 lol...Unfortunatly all I have to scan on at the moment is a HP psc 1210....not a good or fair scanner by any means.I am saving for a better scanner for the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
conrad_hoffman Posted October 20, 2005 Share Posted October 20, 2005 I had an HP 4200 scanner, and it was pretty good except for b&w prints. The grain even on FP4+ prints would always come out exagerated and foul looking. Nothing I did with settings made much difference, and it didn't work properly when I switched to Win XP. Away it went, and I got an Epson 4490. The difference is amazing. Grain looks like grain and overall scan quality is excellent. The Epson software is also fantastic compared to the goofy and time wasting HP "intelligent scanning technology" nonsense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ivan_dzo Posted October 20, 2005 Share Posted October 20, 2005 Whatever scanner you have got, it will exaggerate the film grain. For high speed shots less grainy, you are probably better off with fuji 1600 colour print film. Generally the fine grained films like TMX scan the best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nikos peri Posted October 20, 2005 Share Posted October 20, 2005 Yep... One trick is to make sure the scanner software has any form of sharpening turned off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtk Posted October 20, 2005 Share Posted October 20, 2005 It's not true that desktop scanners always exaggerate grain. Nikon V doesn't exaggerate grain *at all* using Vuescan (and you can even reduce grain while keeping it sharp)... My old Epson 3200 didn't exaggerate grain *at all* with Epson's scanning application or with the bundled version of Silverfast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glen peterson Posted October 20, 2005 Share Posted October 20, 2005 Funny thing about my High rez b&w scans. When I view them on Paint Shop Pro. They look nasty grainy. In Photoshop they look TONS better. This also happens with color, but not to the same extent. The Prints always look good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulh Posted October 20, 2005 Share Posted October 20, 2005 I assume you're scanning the negative. Try turning off any sharpening or grain reduction or any other automagic thingies. Try scanning at the highest resolution (say around 2400 or above) and then scale the image down in your image editor. I've not had much problem scanning a variety of B+W film, from ISO25 to ISO1600. Paul Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lex_jenkins Posted October 24, 2005 Share Posted October 24, 2005 Interesting. Grain in my b&w negatives is always exaggerated by my film scanner, but I haven't noticed any particular problem with flatbed scans of my prints. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rdkirk Posted October 31, 2005 Share Posted October 31, 2005 Are you sure it's not "grain aliasing" that you're seeing? First, realize that the grain pattern you see is really grain clumping, not the actual silver halide grains. When a scanner is resolving significantly below being able to resolve the grain clumps, you may get a smooth, less "grainy" (and less sharp) image in which the scanner noise becomes the limiting factor. Sort of like using Microdol-X. If the scanner resolution is well above the grain clumping, it clearly resolves it for what it is. But when a scanner's resolution is right at the edge (or just below) of being able to resolve the grain clumps distinctly--kind of a resolution Twilight Zone--it produces an aliasing effect that exaggerates the grain appearance. It optically joins grain clumps to form larger clumps, not being able to resolve quite finely enough to distinguish them. The answer, then, is to either go to much higher scan resolution, or loser resolution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now